As the rivalry between the U.S. and Russia is seemingly moving closer to open conflict, Ukraine’s strategic importance is re-emerging. In mid-December, Russian President Vladimir Putin successfully pressured cash-strapped Ukraine into remaining in Russia’s orbit and canceling its planned alliances with the U.S.-leaning European Union (EU) and the U.S.-run International Monetary Fund (IMF). Putin bought off Ukraine by pledging a $15 billion loan and a 33 percent cut in gas prices. In return, Moscow gets control of Ukraine’s energy pipeline network. But the stakes here run beyond economics. They have everything to do with military preparations for future wars.
On December 17, Stratfor, an intelligence analysis outfit that advises Exxon and other major corporations, warned its capitalist readers:

Ukraine is as important to Russian national security as Scotland is to England or Texas is to the United States. In the hands of an enemy, these places would pose an existential threat to all three countries….Neither Scotland nor Texas is going anywhere. Nor is Ukraine, if Russia has anything to do with it….Ukraine is Russia’s soft underbelly….Under the influence or control of a Western power, Russia’s (and Belarus’) southern flank is wide open…running from the Polish border east almost to Volgograd [originally Stalingrad] then south to the Sea of Azov,… [over] 1,000 miles, more than 700 of which lie along Russia proper….

For Russia, Ukraine is a matter of fundamental national security. For a Western power, Ukraine is of value only if that power is planning to engage and defeat Russia, as the Germans tried to do in World War II.
Putin Stops NATO Expansion Dead
Putin didn’t merely frustrate the EU and the IMF; he stopped the expansion of Pentagon-led NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) in its tracks. Founded in 1949, four years after the end of World War II, NATO’s main mission was to prepare for a European war against the USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics). After the Soviet Union imploded, NATO expanded into a worldwide military operation across three continents. It invaded Eastern Europe (Kosovo), North Africa (Libya), Iraq and Afghanistan in order to maintain its dominance among imperialist rivals for strategic and economic goals.
In the 1990s, with the phony-communist Soviet empire a thing of the past, opportunistic U.S. rulers successfully enlisted 12 of Moscow’s ex-satellites into NATO. But Ukraine is a special case because it commands Russia’s warm-water Black Sea naval ports. These outlets do not freeze over in winter, a crucial advantage in wartime. Putin and the Russian capitalists he represents cannot permit Ukraine to join the military alliance led by the U.S., their bitter imperialist rival.
Putin’s Ukraine pushback signals a hardening Russian position that was anticipated by the more foresighted U.S. planners. In the late 1940s, diplomat George Kennan formulated the U.S. policy of “containment” of the USSR, the central Cold War strategy followed by U.S. presidents from Harry Truman to Ronald Reagan. Containment was the ideological basis for U.S. atrocities in Korea, Vietnam, Nicaragua and Afghanistan. At the same time, it allowed U.S. bosses to avoid a direct confrontation with the mighty Soviet forces that crushed the Nazis in World War II. Kennan warned that moving beyond containment and NATOizing the old Soviet bloc was a “tragic mistake.... the Russians will gradually react quite adversely” (New York Times, 5/2/98). He also pinpointed the critical failure of U.S. capitalists. While relying more and more on regional military actions, they have yet to mobilize the nation for global war. “We have signed up to protect a whole series of countries,” Kennan wrote, “even though we have neither the resources nor the intention to do so in any serious way.”
U.S. bosses by and large ignored Kennan. They thought they had Ukraine wrapped up after the Orange Revolution of 2004, one of the so-called “color revolutions” in former republics within the old USSR. Financed largely by various foundations controlled by liberal billionaire George Soros, the Orange Revolution brought pro-NATO Yulia Tymoshenko to power in a contested election.
Revolution = Working-Class Seizure of State Power
In reality, these “revolutions” had no revolutionary content. Revolution occurs only when the working class violently overthrows the ruling class, smashes the rulers’ state power, and establishes new class rule and its own state power. Neither capitalist-run elections nor an “Arab spring” can make a revolution. Only workers, led by a mass communist party, can accomplish that.
In 2008, Russian rulers dealt with the “Rose Revolution” in Georgia by invading its Black Sea neighbor. But Putin’s real target was Ukraine. On August 28, 2008, Agence France Press quoted the RAND Corporation’s F. Stephen Larrabee:

Georgia is a sideshow. What the Russians are really concerned about is Ukraine. Georgia’s entry into NATO wouldn’t have major strategic consequences for Russia. Ukraine, on the other hand, is a very different matter. If Ukraine joins NATO, Russia would not only be forced to remove its ships based in Crimea; it also would see dashed its hopes of founding a…union with Ukraine and Belarus. What’s more, Russian and Ukrainian defense industries are closely linked.

Tymoshenko is now serving a seven-year jail sentence on trumped-up charges of abuse of power and embezzlement. Her country, meanwhile, has become even more pivotal to ruling-class strategists with an eye to a potential Word War III. U.S. capitalists constitute the “Western power planning to defeat Russia” as Stratfor put it. Their top policy-shaping think tank is the Council on Foreign Relations, which is dominated by ExxonMobil and JPMorgan Chase. The Council’s current Foreign Policy web page highlights two Kennan essays from 1939 and 1942: “Preparing Civilian America for War” and “Policy and Strategy in the War in Russia.”
Ukraine’s Workers Suffer Miseries of Capitalism
What the rulers omit from the equation is the working class in Ukraine and in all the other places victimized by the imperialists. Ukraine’s workers are voicing intense dissatisfaction with the miseries of capitalism. The country’s death rate exceeds its birth rate; Ukraine’s population has dropped from a peak of 52.2 million in 1993 to 45.5 million today.
While official unemployment has recently fluctuated between 8 and 9.5 percent, the actual jobless figure is closer to 25 percent. (Ukrainian employers do not report laid-off workers.) Often workers go unpaid for several months before being laid off. Wages are so low that a high percentage of families need at least two wage-earners to survive. The lack of job opportunities has driven 4.5 million Ukrainians — 10 percent of the population — to work abroad.
These conditions have fueled the workers’ mass protests since November 21, when the regime of Moscow-backed President Victor Yanukovich suspended talks on an “Association Agreement” with the European Union. The exploitation of Ukrainian workers reflects the worldwide fight for profits among the major imperialist powers. In Ukraine it pits Russian billionaires (known as oligarchs) against their European counterparts. U.S. rulers are backing the European Union; Yanukovich represents the pro-Russian Ukrainian oligarchs. The western Ukraine in particular is a hotbed of anti-communism, and much media publicity was given to the tearing down of a statue of Vladimir Lenin in the capital, Kiev.
Rinat Akhmetov, the richest Ukrainian oligarch, owns a $250 million mansion in London and has taken much of his $15 billion fortune out of Ukraine. He’s a pro-Russian supporter of Yanukovich but appears to be hedging his bets. Recently he seemed to favor the protesters in Kiev’s Independence Square.
A Boss Is A Boss Is A Boss
An alliance with the EU is widely popular among Ukrainian workers, in part because Europe’s fake-democratic veneer seems more appealing than Putin’s more open fascism. The EU fosters a lot of talk about civil society, transparency and the rule of law. Much of this blabber comes from the same oligarchs who made their obscene fortunes by trampling over both society and the law. There is little or nothing in the Association Agreement that would benefit workers. In fact, both the EU and the IMF (following the Greek example) are demanding strict austerity measures in Ukraine, from tax increases to budget cuts.
All of Ukraine’s workers — east or west, Ukrainian- or Russian-speaking, industrial or agricultural — need communism. They don’t need more exploitation by the Putin-led capitalists or the anti-Putin gang. They need the Progressive Labor Party.
PLP Only Hope for World’s Workers
The struggle for communism is a long and hard one, but it’s the only solution. As inter-imperialist rivalry leads inevitably toward a broader and bloodier war, and the rulers attack wages and living conditions around the globe, the international growth of the Progressive Labor Party is the only hope for the workers of the world. We need to expand PLP to Ukraine so communist ideas can begin to take root there.
Most of all, we must rebuild the worldwide communist movement. In the past it was a beacon for the working class. It helped restrain capitalism’s murderous exploitation. It defeated fascism in World War II. With its retreat, the world’s capitalists have a freer hand to maim and murder for their profits. A rebuilt communist movement can take the next step and destroy capitalism forever. Spread communism and build PLP everywhere!

Newark, NJ, December 18 — “You know, all this stuff going on with the schools is really making me think more about capitalism,” said one teacher involved in the class struggle here. He isn’t alone. Over the past few months, Progressive Labor Party (PLP) members have been more openly discussing capitalism and the need for communist revolution. These discussions are framed by the fightback against Superintendent Cami Anderson’s racist attacks on schools in predominantly black neighborhoods.
At a recent rally led by misleaders of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and a local Newark group, New Jersey Communities United, over 200 workers and students protested these attacks. The leadership focused the blame solely on Anderson and ignored the contradictions within capitalism that cause schools to fail the working class. But PLP was there to offer our communist analysis. We distributed CHALLENGE and had good discussions with teachers who were unfamiliar with the Party.
‘Becoming way too radical way too fast’
One teacher had never known a communist before joining this struggle. He said, “I can’t believe that I would ever read a communist newspaper and agree with what they are saying. I am becoming way too radical way too fast.” He wasn’t alone.  Many education workers and students responded to the Dec. 11 article about Anderson’s racist letter. They also found the editorial about the U.S. rulers’ drive to war helpful in understanding the world situation and how it affects public schools.
Through discussions and literature, PLP members have shown that the latest crop of education reforms, including the charter school movement, are designed to discipline the working class and consolidate U.S. rulers’ top-dog superpower status.  Charter schools give the ruling class more maneuverability; they are operated without even a facade of accountability to parents and students. The new Common Core State Standards Initiative, backed by President Barack Obama and the capitalists he serves, are being pushed in all schools, traditional and charter. The Common Core is essential to the bosses’ plan for centralized ideological control and heightened patriotism.
Closing Schools for Capitalism
A few days after the rally, Anderson announced the closings of 20 schools and a remodeling that may lay off hundreds of education workers.  An overwhelming majority of the schools to be shut down are from the mostly black South, West and Central Wards. The East Ward, which is mostly white and Latino, will remain untouched, still another way they’re dividing the working class. This is to persuade these students to think they are better off.
At a number of other schools, faculty will be forced to reapply for their jobs, regardless of tenure or seniority.  Once again, this anti-worker measure will be concentrated in all-black districts. One exception is the Hawkins Street School in the East Ward, which serves most of the students from public housing projects like Hyatt Court, Terrell Court, and Riverview Court.
Misleaders Ignore Racism
In typical form, none of the union leaders — from the AFT to the New Jersey Teachers’ Union (NTU) to the Newark Teachers Union — will criticize Anderson’s boss, Governor Chris Christie. Nor will they acknowledge the racist nature of these school attacks. After Anderson’s letter was released, the NTU’s main complaint was that reduced truancy would result in fewer arrests of Newark students!
PLP has a different point of view. We have always said that fighting racism is essential to the fight for communism — and to the schools struggle here as well. Our communist leadership has won both teachers union members and students to make anti-racism a key element in our fight.  In addition, we have recruited Newark parents and students to join our communist study group.
The Limits of Reform Struggles
A few days after the rally, our study group discussed “Reform and Revolution,” one of PLP’s core documents.  Although it is over 35 years old, and some aspects of our politics have changed since then, it remains relevant for anyone who wants to organize within the reform movement for a communist revolution.  
When we discussed the Dream Act, the immigration reform backed by the Democratic Party, one comrade emphasized the limits of any reform victories. The bosses simply reorganize, he said, and come back with a vengeance to take away temporary any gains. This is today’s reality for millions of workers who have been stripped of pensions, health benefits and decent working conditions.
The education struggle in Newark is no different. We may keep some schools from closing for a time. We may prevent some teachers from getting laid off, at least for now. But as long as the bosses have state power, schools will serve the profit-based system of capitalism. Until we win millions to fight for communism, the bosses will eventually win out every time.
In our study group we have friends who fear alienating students by talking about capitalism and communism. There are workers who hold back from the mass movement because they think workers are “out for themselves.”  Through friendly struggle, we’ve made progress in convincing some of these workers to get involved in the mass movement, raise communist ideas and expand PLP’s base.
Growing PLP
Over the past two weeks, the schools struggle has definitely sharpened. Our work within the reform movement gives PLP the potential to grow and provide communist leadership to the thousands of workers fighting back. It won’t be easy, because the union bosses and community groups are competing for the minds of the working class. But if the Party keeps fighting, building relationships, and getting CHALLENGE to those around us, we can realize that potential. We are on our way.

I recently attended a mandatory meeting establishing (new) requirements for teachers regarding the reporting of suspected child abuse.  A key part of the presentation was the idea that “the authorities” would rather see over-reporting of non-child abuse cases as opposed to under-reporting of actual child abuse cases.  Now the ruling class certainly doesn’t care about child abuse.  Cutting food stamps,  intensifying racism,  denying disability benefits, and using drone strikes to kill children are legal and beyond reproach. 
It is now illegal for a teacher to not report suspected child abuse.  In other words, they can now claim that you were “negligent” in not bringing to your supervisor’s attention that you “suspect” something is amiss, even if you never witnessed the supposed suspicious behavior.
What, then, is going on?  There are several reasons for this more overt approach:
  1) Since teachers care about the welfare of the students, the ruling class needs teachers to convince students that “the authorities” (child welfare agencies, district attorneys’ offices, police departments) are “on their side” and are dedicated to helping people. 
2) The ruling class needs to convince teachers that poor student outcomes are, at the very least, the fault of the students and their parents.
3) The ruling class wants to use teachers in the same way the Nazis did: get them to encourage their students to rat on their parents’ (or anyone else’s) left-wing and communist politics.  Using child abuse as the opener is a way to suck teachers into this kind of mind set.
4) The new rules make it even easier for school boards to find that certain “rebellious” teachers should be fired while claiming that their removal has nothing to do with politics but only occurred because the teacher “condoned” child abuse activity.
The above applies to Pennsylvania. I don’t know what is happening in other states but it’s probably not all that different.  We need to be aware of these changes and to point out their very dangerous implications as well as to show how deceptive the ruling class is by hiding its methods behind “doing something to help children.”
Red Teacher

Port-au-Prince, November 21 — Ronel Désir is a third-year student at the Ecole Normale Supérieure (Teachers College) in the Haitian capital, site of demonstrations for the removal from office of the right-wing President Michel Martelly. Like hundreds of other students from the campuses of UEH [Université d’Etat d’Haïti, State University of Haiti], Ronel took part on November 18 in a mass protest mostly organized by Lavalas, the organization of former President Aristide and current politicians like the outspoken senator Jean-Charles Moïse.  Many students have no faith in Lavalas or bourgeois politicians like Moïse but took part anyway, with other left and liberal groups, because they have been fighting Martelly ever since the U.S. embassy helped him gain power.
When he came back to campus after the march that afternoon, Ronel was struck directly on the right hand by a vicious weapon, a stun grenade which not only deafens protesters with loud noise but showers them with toxic chemicals. It is supposed to be launched above the heads of a crowd, but the Haitian National Police shot Ronel point blank with it, essentially exploding his hand. His comrades got him to the hospital where his hand was amputated, but he was still fighting a dangerous infection in the arm.
Amputees in Haiti face a tough time in many areas, including employment. Students demonstrated immediately for “Justice for Ronel!” but without any response from the police or the government. This atrocity resembles the police killing with a tear gas canister fired into the head of a picketing teacher, Jean Louis Filbert, in October 2010. The policewoman who killed him merely served six months in jail.
The police, backed up by the UN army of occupation MINUSTAH, often target certain UEH campuses on days of mass demonstrations, attacking before the marches to prevent the students from joining, and after the marches to punish them. On November 18 there was a morning attack with tear gas and an afternoon attack with stun grenades.  Ronel lost his hand not because of a police mistake but because of systematic police intimidation and psychological warfare — in a word, fascism. One of the hallmarks of fascism everywhere is police terror tactics against youth they fear may become rebellious.
Readers can respond with email protests to the Prime Minister, Laurent Lamothe, who is in charge of the commission which oversees the National Police, at this link: primature.gouv.ht/?page_id=22.  Statements of support can go to the students at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..
As the UEH students’ “SOS” says, this is one struggle. A shout-out for Ronel, “Get well, Ronel!” started by a City University of New York (CUNY) union leader who had been informed of the assault, echoed among CUNY students rallying at Baruch College November 25, protesting the CUNY Board of Trustees’ policies of militarization, repression, and tuition hikes.
As capitalists everywhere prepare for war, students and workers internationally have to make our own preparations to defend ourselves.  Uniting across borders — one CUNY group is called Students Without Borders — is job number one.  “Get well, Ronel!”  One day communist students and workers will make the bosses pay for their crimes.