Challenge Radio(Podcast!)  PLP @plpchallenge @plpchallenge

    Type 2 or more characters for results.

    Select your language

    • Español
    • Français
    Join the Revolutionary Communist Progressive Labor Party
    Progressive Labor Party
    • Home
    • Our Fight
    • Challenge
    • Key Documents
    • LiteratureToggle dropdown
      • Books
      • Pamphlets & Leaflets
    • New MagazinesToggle dropdown
      • PL Magazines
      • The Communist
    • Join Us
    • Search
    • Donate
    Open slide pane
    1. You are here:  
    2. Home
    Information
    Print

    CHALLENGE, February 18, 2004

    Information
    18 February 2004 461 hits

    Elections 2004: Two Parties, One Warmaking-Racist Ruling Class

    NYPD Murders Black Youth:

    a href="#Law Of Capitalist Market: Half the Workers Can’t Meet Basic Needs">"aw Of Capitalist Market: Half the Workers Can’t Meet Basic Needs

    a href="#Brass Says GI Deaths ‘Cost of Doing Business’">Br"ss Says GI Deaths ‘Cost of Doing Business’

    a href="#Red Politics Influence Neighborhood Workers’ Struggles in Mexico">"ed Politics Influence Neighborhood Workers’ Struggles in Mexico

    Celebrate 40 Years Of Challenge

    a href="#‘One Party for one international working class . . .’">‘O"e Party for one international working class . . .’

    Soldiers Back From Iraq Attack General Strike In Dominican Republic

    Fight Racist Attacks On Black And Immigrant Respiratory Therapists

    a href="#Domino Sugar Workers’ Bitter Layoff Pill Sweetens Bosses’ Profits">Do"ino Sugar Workers’ Bitter Layoff Pill Sweetens Bosses’ Profits

    Internationalism Trumps Nationalism At MEChA Conference

    Fighting for the Party in a Mass Student Organization

    a href="#Schwarzenegger Terminates Workers’ Vital Services">"chwarzenegger Terminates Workers’ Vital Services

    Bosses Use Union Leaders to Scab on Grocery Strike

    Ford, DaimlerChrysler: Once A Nazi Always a Nazi

    UAW Helps Auto Bosses Gear Up to Axe Workers

    Rawlings Scores Big From Exploiting Baseball Workers

    a href="#1911 Triangle Fire Didn’t End Sweatshops">"911 Triangle Fire Didn’t End Sweatshops

    LETTERS

    Anti-War Activists Need Red Politics

    Red Army Liberated Auschwitz

    Teacher Salutes Anti-Fascist Stand

    a href="#Boycott, Picket Gibson’s ‘Passion’">Boyc"tt, Picket Gibson’s ‘Passion’

    a href="#‘Community Policing’ Used to Stifle Class Struggle">‘C"mmunity Policing’ Used to Stifle Class Struggle

    RED EYE ON THE NEWS


    Elections 2004: Two Parties, One Warmaking-Racist Ruling Class

    All Democratic . The nation’s biggest capitalists are searching for an effective wartime leader. Their dissatisfaction with George Bush is growing daily. Senator Jay Rockefeller called for a "full investigation" following weapons inspector David Kay’s charge that Bush had invaded Iraq under false pretenses. Rockefeller whined that Bush had "rushed into this war," that is, without first preparing public opinion to fight and die for U.S. rulers’ strategic oil interests. The imperialist wing of U.S. capital that Rockefeller represents needs a president who can win large numbers of people to militarism in the guise of "serving the nation."

    That’s the real significance of John Kerry’s leapfrogging in the Democrats’ race for the White House, whether or not he gains the nomination. Walter Russell Mead, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a top think-tank for U.S. imperialism, commended Kerry’s success in Iowa: "With more than 80% of Iowa caucus-goers endorsing candidates who voted at least to authorize the U.S. strike against Iraq, it is beginning to look as if the Democrats are ready to put the anti-war temptation behind them....That would be good news for the Democrats. No anti-war candidate can win a national contest in 2004. It would also be good news for the country and for the world" (Wall Street Journal, 1/21). Mead adds, "historically, the Democrats have been America’s war party."

    Of all the candidates, Kerry has the most fully-developed "national service" plan to build the military and enlist popular support for a police state. A major plank in Kerry’s platform is a program called "A New Army of Patriots." It demands a compulsory year of service for high schoolers. That service includes assisting local and federal law enforcement in homeland security. Kerry also promises college tuition in return for two years in the military, which he calls "the highest form of service." In addition to expanding the existing Police Corps program, Kerry would create a fascistic "Community Defense Service" with local captains functioning as the eyes and ears of the government.

    Despite his recent stumbling, Howard Dean is also proving useful to the rulers’ war efforts. While U.S. imperialists see a Dean presidency as less and less likely, they praise his skill in leading young people into the dead end of electoral politics.

    Michael O’Hanlon, who studies military affairs for the Brookings Institution, has written no fewer than six op-ed articles since December in various papers criticizing Dean’s lack of foreign policy experience. But the New York Times (2/1) editorializes: "If the product of the Dean movement is thousands of young people who are slightly hardened to the lure of a charismatic candidate, but determined to keep on fighting for a better world, it will have been a success no matter what happens to the former governor of Vermont." The Times quickly explains that "fighting for a better world" means working for the Democratic Party and, implicitly, for its war plans: "The real heroics come from you and your friends with the pamphlets, stolidly going door to door."

    War criminal Wesley Clark remains in the race. The Butcher of Kosovo could become a more viable candidate for the rulers if events, such as another attack like Sept. 11, were to dictate a more rapid militarization of society.

    The CFR’s Mead recites the old saying, "Vote for a Republican, and you get a Depression. Vote for a Democrat, and you get a war." But it’s wrong. Both parties serve capitalism. And it is the profit system itself that, continually and inevitably, brings economic misery, fascism and war.

    NYPD Murders Black Youth:

    Bloomberg’s Crocodile Tears Won’t End Racist Cop Terror

    On January 24, the New York City Police Department added to its long history of racist murders. Many workers may ask: "What else is new?" The cold-blooded killing of black teenagers, defenseless women and children are among the NYPD’s specialties. But the city’s liberal bosses and politicians are putting a particular spin on this crime, trying to lead us into a dangerous political trap.

    The facts of the atrocity are simple enough. Shortly before 1:00 A.M., cop Richard Neri shot 19 year-old Timothy Stansbury on a building roof in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn, while the unarmed youth was taking a short-cut to a party.

    A devoted family member, Mr. Stansbury held a night-shift job at McDonald’s. He was pursuing a GED diploma at Thomas Jefferson H.S. In short, he seemed to be a role model. Well, the cops have murdered many young black and Hispanic role models over the years, and the NYPD brass and mayor’s office have almost without exception taken the classic racist "blame-the-victim" approach to the deed.

    This case seems different. Immediately after Neri had executed Mr. Stansbury, NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelley described the shooting as "unjustified." NYC’s Mayor, billionaire media baron Michael Bloomberg, echoed Kelley and rushed to comfort the youth’s grieving family. On January 30, when Bloomberg attended the funeral, the Brooklyn D.A. asked a grand jury to indict Neri.

    One black city councilman, Albert Vann of Bedford-Stuyvesant, called the gestures by Bloomberg a "defining moment," and predicted a brighter future for relations between New York’s black working class and the NYPD.And that’s the trap we must avoid.

    The cops can never become less racist or lethal to the working class than they have always been. They provide the domestic front line of the profit system’s government, which communists call the state apparatus. They serve the big bosses and embody the bosses’ class dictatorship over us.

    The bosses love to pretend that the cops’ role is to "prevent crime." But it’s just the opposite. The cops exist to help the rulers commit the crimes against us that their maximum profits require. Bloomberg, for example, has carried out hundreds of millions of dollars worth of budget cuts, slashing health, education, day care, the parks, etc., to the bare bones. These cuts have undoubtedly led to more workers’ deaths than all the many police murders in the last decade. The cuts serve the profit interests of NYC’s major banks. The cops’ legalized terrorism gives the rulers firepower to use against working-class rebellions that eventually explode against racist oppression.

    The disgusting hypocrisy of Bloomberg, Kelley and Vann is an act designed to lure us into backing the bosses’ long-range plans for foreign wars and the police state that the profit system will need to carry out this scenario. Even before 9/11, the rulers were engaged in a sharp tactical fight over the best way to package the cops. One side, represented by the Manhattan Institute and its star pupil, racist Rudy Giuliani, NYC’s former mayor, didn’t believe too much in subtlety. Their tactic consisted of giving the cops the order to "shoot first and ask questions later." The cops happily complied. Giuliani’s administrations have a lot of innocent blood on their hands.

    The other side, represented by police "theoretician" George Kelling, by Al Sharpton, by former NYPD Commissioner Bratton (now "serving" LA), by Kelley, and now, apparently, by Bloomberg, wants to dress up the racist wolf in sheep’s clothing. These liberals call for "community policing," which would recruit workers to snitch on each other and police each other. "Community policing" is a scheme to water down and/or squash the class struggles that will inevitably erupt in the wake of U.S. rulers’ oil wars and economic vise-tightening against our class. Under "community policing," the cops will still carry guns and use them against us.

    A boss is a boss is a boss, and a cop is a cop is a cop. The main dangers for our class remain less in the policeman’s bullet than in the bullet disguised as balm for the wounds the bosses inflict on us.

    We must never rely on the rulers or their politicians. Police terror is, and will always remain, an indispensable ingredient of capitalist state power. Bloomberg’s crocodile tears and "community policing" won’t change the fundamental class forces in play here. That’s the main lesson of Bloomberg’s repulsive posturing around the latest racist cop murder in New York.

    a name="Law Of Capitalist Market: Half the Workers Can’t Meet Basic Needs">">"aw Of Capitalist Market: Half the Workers Can’t Meet Basic Needs

    Wage inequality is widening in the U.S., due to capitalism’s drive for maximum profits and increasing international competition, especially among the bosses of the imperialist countries. Corporations are cutting labor costs by laying off workers, pushing those remaining harder for longer hours and shifting production to cheaper labor areas overseas.

    As Karl Marx pointed out long ago, capitalists are driven to invest in technology and machinery — and now automation — that displace even more workers. All this plus shrinking unions, a stagnant minimum wage and the reduction in the manufacturing sector’s share of employment combines to uproot unskilled workers from higher-paying jobs.

    This has produced "far more job-seekers than jobs…a recipe for higher inequality." (Economic Policy Institute) The lowest 10% of the pay range has seen their wages fall while the highest 10% has experienced a rise in pay, not to mention the astronomical increase for the top 1% of the super-rich. The bulk of the Bush tax cuts — approved by both parties in Congress — goes to the wealthy.

    "More than 30 million Americans — one in four workers — are stuck in low-wage jobs that do not provide…a decent life….Thirty million…make less than $8.70 an hour, the official U.S. poverty level for a family of four. …It takes at least double this level for a family to provide for its basic needs. Their low-wage, no-benefit jobs translate into billions of dollars in profits, executive pay, [and] high stock prices…" (The Nation, 2/9)

    These figures cover only the 100 million who work full-time. It excludes part-timers and the unemployed. Sixty percent of the unemployed are ineligible for benefits and receive zero income. The other 40% who do receive unemployment benefits get no more than half their pay, and then only for 26 weeks. Now 375,000 jobless workers whose benefits expired in January were denied an extension by Congress, and another two million workers will also exhaust their 26 weeks in the first half of this year, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. So these nearly 2.4 million workers will also have zero income.

    The so-called average wage, or even the median level, does not include these 20 million unemployed — the majority of whom have no income at all — nor the millions of part-timers (who traditionally earn less per hour than full-timers). So the average income of the entire working class is far lower than the figures reported just for those working full-time.

    Capitalism is driven by the laws of the market to squeeze workers into lower wage levels to maximize profits. The laws of the market cannot be reformed. The international working class can only lead a decent life when we reap the full value of our labor, without the bosses stealing most of that value (see article on baseball-manufacturing workers in Costa Rica, page 8). The only solution is to destroy the profit system that thrives on this inequality and abolish wage slavery with communist revolution, the goal of PLP.

    GI Writes:

    a name="Brass Says GI Deaths ‘Cost of Doing Business’"></">Br"ss Says GI Deaths ‘Cost of Doing Business’

    Recently our unit took leave for a few days. Before releasing us, one officer briefed us on safety, stressing careful driving and preventing injuries by avoiding dangerous activities. After formation, one soldier cracked, "Stay safe and make sure you don’t injure yourself so we can send you to Iraq." What activity could be more dangerous than having the brass send us to war? The soldier’s joke struck at the nerve of the officer’s and NCO’s concern for us.

    The unit promotes recreation — drinking, playing pool, watching movies — and keeping each other in good spirits to maintain morale. Recently our first sergeant encouraged us to talk to our families and friends if we were down or depressed. "We want you to be able to focus on your work," he told us. Basically, they only care about our well-being as it affects our commitment to fight the war.

    When we arrived here, a general told us to "know your enemy." He mentioned the continuing attacks on U. S. soldiers and the number of U. S. fatalities since the war supposedly ended and then said, "The most dangerous enemy is the soldier sitting next to you." He noted that most of the some 9,000 casualties (both injuries and deaths) were from accidents, mishandled weapons and the heat.

    What a bastard! In Iraq the brass regularly order soldiers onto 12- and 24-hour shifts. One Gulf War veteran in our unit was a truck driver in Saudi Arabia. He said the brass made drivers repair, maintain, and operate vehicles for as long as 36 hours at a stretch. One driver was killed when he was run over by a 5-ton truck. He was sleeping under the truck after working two long missions. "Most of the driving accidents happened when we were working beyond exhaustion," our veteran friend told us.

    Our senior NCO’s and officers tell us repeatedly they’re gonna bring us back home safe, but their job is to take us to Iraq to fight this war; coming home safe is optional. Our commander said his first priority is the mission and that he would sacrifice some of us for it. Sensing the chill in the room he smartly added, "That’s the cost of doing business." Of course, he didn’t mention the Iraqis slaughtered for the greater glory of Haliburton’s profits.

    Red Soldier

    a name="Red Politics Influence Neighborhood Workers’ Struggles in Mexico">">"ed Politics Influence Neighborhood Workers’ Struggles in Mexico

    MEXICO CITY, Jan. 27 — A mass movement is growing in a working-class community here, demanding basic services like water, street pavements and drainage systems. Amid this struggle, many are reading, studying and distributing DESAFIO-CHALLENGE, gaining the understanding that the struggle is more than one for services, but mainly to end the oppression, misery and exploitation of capitalism.

    Communism is the only way out. We’re looking for an historical and necessary change. Although we know it will take a long time, it’s worth waging the battles needed to get there.

    A neighbor reading DESAFIO said, "I am hungry to know more about communism, to be able to destroy all the profiteers so that my children will no longer be cannon fodder to be exploited." In a recent PL study group, we read the article, "The Foolish Old Man that Moved Mountains." We agreed to challenge the ignorance and distortions many in the community have about communism.

    Some workers here work for a transportation company. Many have been fired in the last few years. Some have gone beyond the limits set by the bosses, exposing the exploitative origin of the company’s wealth. Meanwhile, workers are fighting the bosses’ firings, wage-cuts and abuses. Fearing the workers’ anger will grow, so far the bosses have not fired the leaders of the struggle. Instead, they were transferred to other departments. Recently new workers were hired, but at lower wages and benefits. They will try to spread this to all workers.

    We must build the Party and a mass communist movement to end this bloodsucking system. In another study group one worker asked, "What does communism have to do with firings?" Another responded, "If you have a better proposal, please put it forward." This kind of friendly but sharp exchange of ideas is crucial to building the Party.

    Some workers have called for "a bigger PLP. We need to win more workers to visit and talk to workers about our Party instead of wasting our time watching TV at night."

    We’ve taken some important steps, establishing a network of DESAFIO distributors with about 50 readers. We have also won a couple of dozen people into study groups, discussing the need to build the communist PLP. Even though some workers have been fired, we’re still in contact with them. The political potential is growing.

    Celebrate 40 Years Of Challenge

    BROOKLYN, NY, Jan. 24—About fifty teachers and other workers, students and friends of PLP celebrated the fortieth anniversary of the greatest working class paper around, CHALLENGE-DESAFIO in a hall decorated with working-class art and a collage of the paper’s headlines over the last four decades. we ate great food donated by comrades and friends.

    A group of high school students read Bertolt Brecht ‘s poem, "General, Your Tank is a Powerful Vehicle." describing how the technology of the bosses’ war machine must depend on humans to function. Earlier in the day a youth group had discussed the article on the key role of soldiers in stopping imperialist wars by using their training and knowledge to fight the generals and the ruling class which use them as cannon fodder . The ruling class’s biggest problem is that workers can think. Our Party and its paper continues to train workers to think and act as revolutionaries.

    The evening’s highlight was a speech by a comrade who described the impact CHALLENGE and the Party has had on an elementary school over a ten-year period. The consistency in spreading the paper and organizing discussions around it in this school sparked an important struggle against forcing children to recite the pledge of allegiance.

    The attack on anti-fascist fighter Inez Weiner was kept front and center with a speech that inspired us to keep pushing forward. CHALLENGE will be a central part of our campaign to bring supporters to the courtroom at her April trial.

    An older man attending the dinner revealed he had been a CHALLENGE reader 30 years ago in Ecuador. A teacher who came with him was impressed enough to take 100 papers to distribute in her classes.

    We must continue to fight for the paper that is a breath of fresh air to the millions who are searching for a way out of the hell of capitalism.

    a name="‘One Party for one international working class . . .’"></">‘O"e Party for one international working class . . .’

    NEW YORK CITY, January 31—It was very emotional to see over 200 people participate in CHALLENGE’s 40th anniversary celebration in Manhattan. Lenin said the revolutionary press has a key role in the Party’s development, each of which were outlined by the first three speakers, in noting CHALLENGE’s accomplishments over four decades in serving the international working class.

    The first speaker said our paper has struggled against the opportunist tendencies of the old communist movement. While learning from the giants in our history, we’ve also gone beyond that in organizing one Party for one international working class across all capitalist borders.

    A second comrade declared that CHALLENGE has played a significant role in most of our political development. He said the first time he read the paper, he was very skeptical. He still remembered the front-page headline which said that capitalism, with its "booms" and economic crises, will only end when workers bury it. He read it three times that night. The next morning he sat with a co-worker at his job to discuss communism, Stalin, the history of the Soviet Union, the Vietnam War, and so on. For the first time in his life, the ideas of communism and the class struggle made him very emotional. When he joined PLP he understood that he was now responsible to win others to fight for communism.

    A third speaker said that sometimes we feel like we’re isolated in a forest, not knowing what’s happening on in the world. "I bet all of us sometimes feel like we’re trapped in a hole. CHALLENGE can help us get out of that hole. It puts the entire world in front of us. Fight for communism!"

    People talked about fighting racism, against imperialist war in Iraq, the fascist Patriot Act and other horrors capitalism has in store for our class. We also enjoyed delicious food served by comrades, along with some revolutionary culture. We concluded by singing the revolutionary working-class anthem The Internationale in several languages.

    An Upper Manhattan Worker

    Soldiers Back From Iraq Attack General Strike In Dominican Republic

    SANTO DOMINGO, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, Jan. 29 — A 48-hour general strike shut down most of this Caribbean nation. Several demonstrators were killed and hundreds were arrested. The strike demanded an end to the government’s deal with the International Monetary Fund imposing more austerity measures on the masses, as well as a 100% wage hike for government and private workers, lower prices on basic foodstuff and an end to the constant blackouts. The country has been lurching from one economic crisis to another. In the last year, the peso’s value has dropped from 17 to the dollar to more than 50. Many Dominicans are risking their lives crossing the dangerous Mona Channel to go to Puerto Rico en route to the U.S.

    The strike was called by some mass reformist organizations and supported by politicians opposed to President Hipólito Mejía’s scheme to get himself re-elected for a second term in the May balloting. The government blames the rotten economy on the world crisis of capitalism and the price of oil (imported from Venezuela). This is partially true, but the government’s corruption and ineptness has made conditions worse.

    Last year, the rich Bainter bank collapsed amid a Parmalat/Enron-style fraud. The government spent over $2 billion bailing out the big investors while working people lost their savings.

    Soldiers just returning from duty in Iraq patrolled the city during the strike (the D.R. being one of the few countries worldwide sending troops to help the U.S.-UK occupation). They even wore the desert camouflage uniforms used in Iraq, not the green olive ones used by the other thousands patrolling the cities. They used their Iraqi training to occupy working-class neighborhoods and attack strike protestors. A few days earlier, one Iraqi veteran killed a young man at a beer hall in San Francisco de Macoris.

    The strike itself is mainly an electoral maneuver to dump the President. Most people supported it because they hate his government. But more than a general strike (a similar strike took place on Nov. 11), or changing one crooked President for another, is needed to end the misery suffered by workers here and abroad. Two days after the strike, the President ignored the mass outpouring against his policies and got himself nominated by a faction inside the divided ruling Party. A similar crisis is enveloping neighboring Haiti, where the U.S.-supported "Democratic Convergence" is trying to topple the former Clinton lackey, President Aristide. Only a united struggle on both sides of the island, based on PLP’s revolutionary communist politics, can free workers and their allies from this capitalist hell.

    Fight Racist Attacks On Black And Immigrant Respiratory Therapists

    CHICAGO, IL, Jan. 29 — The racist Cook County bosses are doing their best to divide the black, Latino, East Indian, Filipino and Mid-Eastern workers who comprise the Respiratory Therapy Department at Stroger Hospital. Armed with an agreement from SEIU Local 73 HC, they’re threatening to fire nine black therapists and technicians if they do not pass a "certification" test by March 31. This is a racist attack on all health workers and patients.

    Racism is the cutting edge in the rulers’ push to fascism and war. Racist budget cuts in health, education, heating allowance and mass transit are financing the imperialist occupation of Iraqi oil fields and the Homeland Security police state. Stroger Hospital and County bosses are collaborating in this process, which arrests and deports Arab and Muslim immigrants, and imprisons more people — mainly young black and Latin men — than any other country in the world.

    The Improving Community Health Survey shows racist disparities in health care from one Chicago community to another, and the gaps are growing. David Ansell, chairman of the Department of Internal Medicine at Mt. Sinai Hospital said, "This is not a problem of individuals who have bad genes. I’ve been dealing with this for 25 years and it’s gotten worse, not better. Despite all these technological advances, the disparities have worsened between the haves and have-nots." (Chicago Tribune, 1/8)

    These licensed and experienced workers have helped our patients breathe for over 20 years. Several black therapists are certified, but most were promoted and licensed based on seniority and work performance. Most have been out of school for 20 years and are heads of households, which makes studying difficult. The exam, which is not required by the State, costs $190 each time one takes it.

    They are being sacrificed to settle the grievances of nine mostly East Indian therapists, who passed their certification but were never promoted. In February 2003, they filed a grievance, tired of doing the same work as the mostly black therapists for $4,000 less per year (Stroger Hospital already pays certified therapists the lowest wages in the city.) In May, Local 73 HC gave the bosses the racist solution they were looking for: give all non-certified (black) therapists six months to pass the exam or lose their jobs. All the new union leadership has done so far is to get a three-month extension.

    Rather than play by the bosses’ rules and be bound by their agreement with the union, we will fight to stop the racist firing of the black therapists, and fight to upgrade the immigrant therapists. In battling this racist attack, we can unite citizen and immigrant, black and white, and explain how racism is at the very core of the profit system.

    This an opportunity to unite the working class and build the revolutionary communist movement. On this 25th Anniversary of PLP defeating the Nazis and integrating Marquette Park, we can build a mass May Day aimed at defeating fascism with communist revolution.

    a name="Domino Sugar Workers’ Bitter Layoff Pill Sweetens Bosses’ Profits"></">Do"ino Sugar Workers’ Bitter Layoff Pill Sweetens Bosses’ Profits

    BROOKLYN, N.Y., Jan. 31 — At one time over 1,300 workers were employed at the Domino sugar refining and packing plant here in the borough’s Williamsburg neighborhood. Now the last 240 workers are being sacked, over 220 today and the rest later this year when the plant closes its doors for good.

    The American Sugar Refining company claims the firings are due to the "falling demand for cane sugar," compared to competing sweeteners. But the real cause is capitalism, where profits trump workers’ lives.

    In June 1958, Brooklyn had 222,000 manufacturing workers. By June of ’84, the number was down to 88,800; and by June of 2003 it had sunk to 33,967. The reason is that more profits can be made from real estate and "the gentrification rippling across" Brooklyn. (N.Y. Times, 1/31) Now the bosses want to use our taxes to build a new stadium for the "Brooklyn Nets," and build high-priced housing from which they can reap still more billions in profits.

    The bosses’ drive for maximum profits pushes them to invest in machinery to lower the cost of labor (see Wages article on page 2). Nine hundred Domino workers lost their jobs to automation by 1992, while the company was making huge profits. Now capitalism’s "free market" finds greener pastures for profits in other industries, sugar substitutes or cheaper labor overseas.

    In 1992-93, the 350 workers struck after rejecting a sellout proposal from the union leaders. No one attempted to scab or cross the picket lines. Yet this militancy and solidarity could not stop the bosses unstoppable drive for maximum profits.

    What was missing was the communist leadership needed to point out to thousands of workers that capitalism is the root of the workers’ problems. Out of such a political struggle, and building on the militancy of the workers to sharpen the class struggle and involving hundreds of thousands of other workers in the city — spreading workers’ consciousness as a class — a revolutionary Party could grow and eventually become strong enough to destroy capitalism altogether. Under communism, workers will never be thrown out like garbage because of a new product but will do other useful things for our class, working for the benefit of the international working class.

    Internationalism Trumps Nationalism At MEChA Conference

    SEATTLE, WA, Jan. 16 — Because of the planning and presence of PLP, working-class internationalism won out over nationalism and liberalism at the annual MEChA Regional Conference for the Pacific Northwest at my campus here. I am an officer and active member of MEChA, a Chicano student organization. Since the conference theme was "Empowering la Mujer" [Women], we had arranged for a young women worker to speak about conditions in her plant, a subcontractor that makes parts for Boeing airplanes (commercial and military), super-exploiting their mostly immigrant, female workforce. Since Boeing is still one of the state’s largest employers, this hit home with many of the students at the conference.

    The worker discussed the current world situation, how the ruling class is waging its wars by exploiting immigrant workers and using their children as cannon fodder. She concluded chanting, "Men, women, students, workers and soldiers united will never be defeated." All 300 students chanted along with her and gave her a standing ovation.

    This reaction in an organization known for its nationalist politics shows the potential to win many of these young people to a more internationalist, class-conscious ideology if we continue to struggle with them. This is really what MEChA members need to answer the problems they face every day.

    None of this happened by accident. Without a Party presence, the world situation either would not have been discussed at all or, if so, the solution presented would have been a very nationalist one. I have been trying to recruit members of this particular chapter for almost a year now, so my club knew the conference was an opportunity we couldn’t let pass by. It was important to do the work of the conference while also building the Party. My comrades’ help was invaluable, as always. After the conference our club decided it was imperative that more Party members get to know my friends in MEChA.

    To further the political development of people in the mass movement, we must be there and raise our politics at these big events as well as in the day-to-day struggles. Because we were organized and politically conscious during this conference, we won two new contacts.

    Our club now sees its main goal as furthering this internationalist, anti-imperialist line by struggling with our friends and the two new contacts to develop a class-conscious political ideology. My first step will be to ask my close friends to join PLP. Ultimately, the only thing that will help them is a strong Party to lead the fight against capitalism and towards communism.

    Fighting for the Party in a Mass Student Organization

    Recently I attended a student conference on worker-student solidarity, sponsored by a student organization in which the Party has been doing good work for a while. Before going, my Party club discussed the importance of revolutionary theory, how Lenin exposed the left fakers for failing to understand that a communist party takes revolutionary consciousness to the mass movement where it fights for these politics.

    In several workshops about trade unions, it became clear that the contradiction really was between reform and revolution. At one workshop, people were asked about their organizations. I said I was in the Progressive Labor Party, that we were a multi-racial, international party whose platform was to eliminate racism and the system of capitalism, and that we make revolutionary politics primary in order to create a communist society free from exploitation, racism and sexism. I received a warm response.

    The younger students asked if Cuba had communism. I said "no" and started to explain what communism was, but one of the facilitators said talking about communism would "take too long," that we weren’t there for that but rather for the presentation — advancing student-worker solidarity. So then we talked about that.

    After that workshop one of the facilitators, who was in a union, said she really liked what I said and gave me information to contact her. I then gave her a CHALLENGE and said one of my comrades would call her. When I asked the whole crowd to take the paper, I made the mistake of not asking individual people, so I didn’t get too many out.

    At another workshop, a United Farm Workers (UFW) representative described conditions for farm workers, warning there would be a major push by right-wing republicans to lower the minimum wage for these workers. He also criticized Bush’s immigration "reform" proposals and concluded that we must vote in the next elections. I then said relying on the unions and especially on voting to solve our problems was like a pet in a cage, trying to escape to freedom by running on the treadmill. Instead we need to place revolution at the forefront of our politics, to end exploitation by abolishing the wage system once and for all, meaning communism.

    Again the union official said we couldn’t talk about that now, but rather about immediate solutions. I felt my position was clearly stated, and that any further talk of revolution would probably lead to me being kicked out. Later, someone asked what Cesar Chavez would do. I said Chavez turned in the names of union members to the Immigration Service. Ultimately I corrected my previous mistake, and distributed CHALLENGE to every PERSON who was interested.

    In further meetings, we continued the struggle, crucial for developing some of our friends.

    Liberal led organizations won’t give up leadership without a fight. We’re a small party and must do the painstaking, detailed work to win people closest to our ideas to the Party. Putting communist politics primary is most important. I learned that the collective is the key to organizing. We must investigate the contradictions, and determine which are primary and which secondary. Had I taken on all the contradictions at once, I probably would have isolated myself. I made a contact who will help continue the struggle of the group’s rank and file. Our strength is the line of the Party. We’re on the long road to building a mass communist party to take state power.

    a name="Schwarzenegger Terminates Workers’ Vital Services">">"chwarzenegger Terminates Workers’ Vital Services

    On January 10, California’s Governor released a proposed budget for 2004 containing sweeping cuts in desperately needed healthcare, social services and education for the working class. These cuts are part of the larger attack on the entire working class as U.S. rulers spend workers’ tax monies on fighting war after war to maintain their profits and world domination.

    While state prisons received a hefty increase, Governor Swarzenegger proposed a $240-million cut from the State University budget. This will slash all higher education outreach and recruitment programs. The state’s largest outreach project is the Educational Opportunity Program (EOP) which recruits a clear majority of low-income students, especially black and Latino, into higher education. The budget also increases tuition by 10% for undergraduates and 40% for graduates. This is on top of ex-Governor Davis’s 40% increase last year.

    The reform leaders are focusing on saving EOP. They say we should ignore the openly racist nature of the cuts and appeal to the middle class — keep the message "simple." Their slogan is, "EOP equals social stability."

    But if college education produces social stability, then we should see an increasing rate of stability as more and more people get college degrees. In fact, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported that more people than ever graduated from college in 1996 and that rate has been continuing. It also reported substantial increases in graduation rates for all racial categories, but racism continues to mean lower numbers of black and Latino grads. According to the reformers’ logic, these increased rates should produce at least a small improvement in social stability. But, in fact, the 2000 census reported just the opposite. The gap between poor and rich doubled from 1979 to 2000 (N.Y. Times, 9/25). All major poverty indicators have worsened — unemployment, homelessness, children living in poverty, people without health insurance, etc.

    There can be no social stability under capitalism, which is inherently unstable. A system that cannot provide healthcare, education, and needed social services for workers should be destroyed. The ruling class does not support public education to liberate workers from exploitation. From kindergarten through college, education exists predominantly to justify the exploitative capitalist system. New workers are trained and indoctrinated to enter different levels of the class hierarchy based on the family’s income level. Meanwhile, vast numbers of working-class youth are excluded through a combination of high tuition, racist under-education and high-stakes testing. While all workers are exploited, those excluded from education are forced into the most super-exploited jobs and/or into the bosses’ military.

    PLP members and friends are participating in the fight against these racist budget cuts that are part of the bosses’ war budget and attacks on our class from Iraq to California. We can achieve a big victory and help to build a mass PLP by showing that this system needs inequality and uses racism and sexism to justify it. Capitalism will never provide the services the working class needs. PLP is fighting to organize students, workers, and soldiers to destroy the profit system and build a communist world based on creating a decent life for the working class. Join us!

    Bosses Use Union Leaders to Scab on Grocery Strike

    LOS ANGELES, Jan. 31 — Thousands of workers and students rallied and marched here, supporting the four-month-long grocery workers’ strike. The AFL-CIO, the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), religious and community groups sponsored it. PLP distributed thousands of leaflets calling for action to stop scabs, shut stores tight, march on May Day and fight for workers’ power — communist revolution — because "a system that can’t provide decent health care for workers should be smashed." Many strikers and supporters bought CHALLENGE, saying the union leaders have refused to organize a strike based on the workers’ power and unity.

    The demonstrators were angry at the attacks on the workers, whose health benefits have been cancelled, and whose strike benefits have been sliced in half. Some are also angry at the union leaders’ refusal to organize against the scabs and shut the stores. These union fakers also encouraged people to shop at a chain which has locked workers out and is using scabs. Except for one month, the UFCW and Teamster leadership allowed and urged teamsters to drive their trucks up to the picket lines, from where the store managers take the merchandise to the loading docks. The UFCW leadership has also pulled pickets from the distribution centers, allowing the teamsters to scab. Several teamsters said they wanted to honor the lines, but "without UFCW pickets, we were told we must do the work." Others encouraged them to reject this rotten leadership and back the strike.

    While many are boycotting the stores, they’re open and many others are shopping. Ringing the stores with strikers and other workers throughout southern California might not guarantee the workers’ health benefits but, with red leadership, it could certainly show workers their potential power to act as a class against the bosses’ profit system, with its exploitation and imperialist wars.

    Rick Icaza, head UFCW’s LA-based Local 770, with 30,000 members, was paid $273,000 in 2002. (LA Times, 1/26) His wages weren’t cut during the strike! He and the other AFL-CIO leaders are serving the liberal bosses, telling workers we’re powerless, that our only hope lies in voting for Democratic politicians whose health scheme would mean continued rationing based on the bosses’ war economy needs.

    One of the rally’s main speakers was California State Attorney-General Bill Locklear, hailed as a "hero" by the union leaders for pursuing an anti-trust action against the three grocery chains. The unions want workers to rely on the bosses’ laws, the same ones that make it legal to scab and illegal to stop them, that label workers’ violence against scabs "illegal" while the U.S. government’s mass violence against the workers of Iraq in the drive for oil profits is completely "legal."

    Many strikers and their supporters are open to an alternative to the bosses’ agents and their outlook. PLP is fighting to turn some of this potential into actual growth for the revolutionary communist movement.

    Ford, DaimlerChrysler:

    Once A Nazi Always a Nazi

    Several developments in the auto industry confirm the fact that capitalists defend their interests and profits by any means necessary, including fighting ferociously for markets, using death squads to torture and kill workers, and joining hands with Nazis.

    On the production front, Toyota has surpassed Ford as the world’s second leading automaker, a position it has held for 70 years. In 2003, GM sold 8.59 million units worldwide, followed by Toyota with 6.78 million and Ford with 6.72 million (not including Ford-controlled Mazda). Not only has Toyota passed Ford, but it is also set to displace DaimlerChrysler as the number three seller in the U.S. market. U.S. auto bosses are also trailing Toyota in the fast-growing Asian market, particularly China, where Toyota’s profits have outdone any one of the U.S. "Big 3."

    Also, Ford is being sued in an LA federal court for participating in "crimes against humanity" during the ruthless military dictatorship that ruled Argentina in the late 1970’s. Between 1976 and 1978, death squads kidnapped 25 union delegates at the General Pacheco Ford plant. Ford bosses fingered the militant workers. The death squads entered the plant, tied the workers’ hands with barbed wire, put hoods on their heads, and took them to a sports center (a clandestine jail) at the plant complex where they were tortured for five hours. Then they were taken in a company truck to a police station where they were held secretly for several months. They were then jailed in Villa Devoto and La Plata for over a year. Two never returned.

    On January 14, relatives and former workers filed a similar suit in a Northern California federal court, accusing DaimlerChrysler of conspiring to jail and murder 22 workers in an Argentine Mercedes-Benz plant during the military regime (Daimler owned Mercedes-Benz even before it took over Chrysler). An internal "investigation" recently "cleared" the company, but workers won’t retreat from exposing that the Mercedes plant bosses provided the military government with pictures of the more militant workers. Mercedes worker Esteban Reimer, labeled an "agitator" by the company, was kidnapped and murdered by the death squads. The plant’s chief of production, Juan Tasselkraut, worked for the Argentine intelligence services.

    Both Ford and Mercedes were Nazi supporters. Mercedes was a major part of the Nazi war machine and used slave labor in its factories. Ford’s German subsidiary built trucks and other war vehicles for the Nazis, even during the war. Ford, like Charles Lindbergh, Joseph Kennedy (the Kennedy clan’s daddy) and Bush’s granddaddy loved Hítler. Henry Ford wrote the anti-Semitic "International Jew," praising anti-Semitism. Its Argentine edition contained the Protocols of Zion, a forgery concocted by the Russian Tsar’s secret police, which became the basis for modern anti-Semitism. Ford distributed this forgery worldwide, and published the first English translation of Hitler’s Mein Kampf. Ford visited the Führer, who awarded him the "Iron Cross." For decades, Ford’s hometown of Dearborn, MI was off-limits to black workers, unless they were going to or from work in his factories, and was run by white supremacist Mayor Orville Hubbard.

    Lawsuits won’t end this era of endless wars, racism and police-state-Homeland Security, which are part and parcel of capitalism’s defense of its profits. Scratch any boss and you’ll find a Nazi. PLP is building an international revolutionary communist movement. That’s the best weapon to fight fascism! "Workers of the World, Unite!"

    UAW Helps Auto Bosses Gear Up to Axe Workers

    THREE RIVERS, MI. — "The new agreement makes doing business here…on par with Mexico. They don’t have to move the jobs to Mexico," squealed City Manager Joe Bippus about United Auto Workers (UAW) Local 2093 adopting a three-tier wage scale at the American Axle parts plant here. It’s not the first time the UAW has agreed to wage concessions for "job security," but this is the first three-tier wage scale in U.S. auto plants.

    Of the 1,000 UAW members who build axles and drive shafts, the 420 high-seniority top-tier workers earning about $26-an-hour will take a 64 cents-an-hour pay cut. The 580 second-tier employees earn $13.50 to $17 an hour. For new hires in the new, third tier, pay begins at $13.50 an hour, with no cost-of-living increases for at least two years and they will pay a bigger share of their health costs. About 100 third-tier workers will be hired later this year as part of the $28 million plant expansion.

    Recently UAW President Gettelfinger assured an industry conference, "The perception of the UAW is that a relationship with our union can be a drag on your production process. The reality is far different." The "production process" reflects the growth of fascism in preparation for endless wars. "The reality" is that the nationalist, pro-capitalist union leaders are trying to stay in business by delivering workers to fascism and war.

    About 2.7 million factory jobs have disappeared since January, 2001. Michigan has lost 170,000 manufacturing jobs during this time, and GM, Ford and DaimlerChrysler are expected to slash up to 50,000 more jobs under the current UAW contract.

    The union is renegotiating a new master contract covering American Axle’s U.S. operations. The current one expires Feb. 24. They’re also in talks with auto parts giants Delphi Corp. and Visteon Corp., spun off from GM and Ford, to adopt permanent two-tier wages. Last year they signed a $10-an-hour wage cut "to save jobs" at a Chrysler parts plant that was sold to Metaldyne Corp.

    The union has spent the last 25 years, since the1979 Chrysler bailout, surrendering hundreds of thousands of jobs and billions in wage and benefit concessions, to make U.S. bosses "more competitive." This is how Gettlefinger and the whole generation of UAW leaders have developed. Now they stand at the brink of irrelevancy. UAW membership has dropped from 1.5 million in 1979 to 638,722 at the end of 2002. Of about 500,000 hourly jobs at U.S. auto parts suppliers, 80% are non-union, up from 50% in the 1970s. They’ve failed to organize a single European- or Asian-owned "transplant." And their choice for President, Gephardt, was the first Democratic hopeful to fall.

    We don’t have to follow them over the cliff. Today they sacrifice jobs and benefits. Tomorrow they will sacrifice workers’ lives and limbs as international "car wars" become imperialist shooting wars. Building a mass, international PLP, that knows no nations or borders, can turn these imperialist wars into class wars for communist revolution.

    Rawlings Scores Big From Exploiting Baseball Workers

    Karl Marx discovered the "secret" of capitalist exploitation, the fact that workers are paid far less than the value they add to the production of finished goods. The rather complicated computations he used to arrive at the source of capitalist profits can be understood by the men and women of Turrialba, Costa Rica who make the nearly 2,000,000 baseballs used annually by major league baseball, for which they are paid approximately $2,750 a year. This is a mere pittance compared to the profits of the Rawlings Sporting Goods company that manufactures the baseballs.

    Each worker handcrafts 4 baseballs an hour and is paid an average of 30¢ a ball. Rawlings sells the balls in the U.S. at $14.99 each.

    "After I make the first two or three balls…they have already paid my salary," says 37-year-old Overly Monge. "Imagine that."

    That’s surplus value in a nutshell. In the first hour, Monge makes his weekly wage. Rawlings grosses $60 (at $14.99 per ball) from those first four baseballs, more than Monge’s $55 weekly salary. For the next 54 hours he’s making profits for Rawlings. At 4 balls an hour, for a minimum 55 hours a week, he produces 220 baseballs. Rawlings profits from 216 of them, which brings them $3,237.84 PER WORKER EVERY WEEK! PLP fights for communist revolution to abolish this exploitive capitalist wage system altogether.

    Not all of that is pure profit. But Rawlings profits from the Costa Rican government’s "free trade zone": no taxes, no import duties for the materials needed to manufacture the balls, on a 54,000-square-foot area awarded free to Rawlings. No wonder U.S. bosses want that free-trade zone extended to ALL of Costa Rica in the prospective NAFTA-like accord now being negotiated.

    Brother Monge is earning the same $55 a week as when he started 13 years ago. And for that he suffocates in 95-degree heat sewing 108 perfect stitches along the seams in a process that can only be done by hand. "A machine can’t make them…but it demands the precision and speed of a machine." The worker becomes the machine.

    "It messes up your hands…hurts your shoulders" and "deforms your fingers and arms." After nine years at Rawlings, Soledad Castillo, 46, cannot make a fist or touch her right palm with her middle finger. From 1991-1997, one-third of the workers developed carpel tunnel syndrome and 90% experienced pain of some kind.

    Could there be any clearer reason to destroy capitalism and its wage system? A communist society in which workers reap the full benefit of the value they produce, will put the health of the working class first and foremost.

    (All information and quotes from the New York Times, 1/25/04)

    a name="1911 Triangle Fire Didn’t End Sweatshops">">"911 Triangle Fire Didn’t End Sweatshops

    Triangle: The Fire That Changed America by David Von Drehle.

    Atlantic Monthly Press, 340 pages, $25

    On March 25, 1911, a flash fire on two floors of the Asch Building, took the lives of 146 workers of the Triangle Shirtwaist Co. Nearly all were Jewish and Italian immigrants, mostly young women. It was the deadliest workplace disaster in New York history until the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center, 90 years later.

    The Asch Building still stands, at the corner of Washington Place and Greene Street in Greenwich Village, and billionaire Mayor Michael Bloomberg declared it an historic landmark this past year. It’s how the bosses and their politicians co-opt history. They’ve done the same thing with New York’s Tenement Museum and Ellis Island, and with the textile-mill museums in Lowell and Lawrence, Massachusetts. Some of the history is surprisingly candid about workers’ conditions, but it’s all presented as "ancient history." They’ll condemn the Triangle fire, and use it to show how the tragedy led to better working conditions, while ignoring the sweatshops that still exist, some within walking distance of the site of the Triangle fire. Yes, working conditions have changed, somewhat, through workers’ struggles against the bosses, but the essence of capitalism’s racist super-exploitation is a fact of life for most garment workers today, many of them immigrant women. And tens of thousands of workers still die every year in industrial "accidents." Only communist revolution can permanently improve workers’ lives and working conditions.

    Washington Post reporter David Von Drehle’s book is a compelling account of the disaster, with all the horrifying details — the scores of victims who jumped to their deaths from a 9th-floor window rather than be burned alive and the locked doors that prevented their escape down the stairs. It also provides vivid accounts of the 1909 blouse-makers’ strike that emboldened the growing trade-union movement, some of whose leaders died in the fire, leading to some reforms of labor and worker-safety laws.

    Von Drehle has compiled the first complete list of victims, and presents the only existing transcript of the subsequent manslaughter trial of the company’s owners, a document lost for decades. It includes heartbreaking testimony from survivors of the raging inferno. It also punctures the longstanding myth that defense lawyer Max Steuer won his clients’ acquittal by getting a key witness to repeat her testimony verbatim four times, showing it was rehearsed. Her testimony was not repetitive, except for some phrases that Steuer prompted her into repeating.

    The owners were freed because the judge’s instructions to the jury all but forced an acquittal. To convict, the jury would have had to conclude that the owners knew the doors were locked and that the victims would otherwise have survived. This same judge had been forced to resign as city tenement commissioner seven years earlier, being held responsible for a Lower East Side fire that killed 20 people.

    No one was held criminally responsible for the Triangle disaster. The company’s owners actually profited by collecting more insurance than their true losses, and successfully fought most of the civil lawsuits filed against them. Ultimately, 23 victims’ families and survivors settled for just $75 per claim!

    The struggle against sweatshop conditions in the NYC garment industry strengthened the ILGWU (the garment workers’ union, today’s UNITE). But its Social-Democratic leadership became rabidly anti-communist, opposed the old Communist Party (which fought and beat gangsters who worked for the bosses), and allowed sweatshop conditions to flourish. But even if the more militant reformers of the old CP had won, today there would still be few unionized workers in New York’s garment industry or nationally. Sweatshops abound among many subcontractors to major apparel companies. Most garment workers in the U.S. are immigrants from Latin America and Asia, adding racism to the equation, a source of capitalist super-exploitation.

    Ironically, N.Y. Times columnist Nicholas Kristoff just wrote (1/14) that the problem isn’t too many third-world sweatshops, "but too few." From China to NYC, from LA to the maquiladoras of Central America and the Caribbean, garment workers need communist revolution, not another century of meager, short-lived reforms. (Information drawn from the NY Post, 1/11/04.)

    LETTERS

    Anti-War Activists Need Red Politics

    Last month a work-buddy and neighbor of mine asked me to attend a neighborhood meeting of the Dean Campaign which showed the film "Uncovered…."

    A crowd of 60 to 70 people in their twenties and thirties and several of our vintage were told that similar showings were occurring across the country. Afterwards we’d be able to e-mail questions to the film’s producers and hear their answers over a speaker phone in the front of the room.

    When the film ended and we were waiting for the phone to ring, I rose and said, "I hope it’s O.K. to make some comments while we’re waiting. Was anyone else disturbed, as I was, by…the voices of ethics and righteousness [from] veteran CIA agents, top military officers and high-level government officials, many of whom must have been the architects or agents of murderous U.S. policies throughout the world over the past several decades. Some may have even trained Saddam Hussein back in the ’80s or planned the murder of Salvadore Allende of Chile and tens of thousands of Chilean leftists."

    One young woman replied, "That was to establish credibility for the film because there are a lot of people who don’t even know that the war was built on lies." I responded, "Yes, but it established credibility for more than just the film. By using these spokespeople, it makes it seem as though just the wrong people are in office, rather than that the whole system is criminal. And look at what the film omitted. Not a word about what the war was really about — control of Mid East oil. This glaring omission shows that the film’s real purpose is to build patriotism and hook all the disaffected anti-war people into the ‘anyone-but-Bush’ movement. The film makes it seem as though the U.S. government’s worst crime is lying. No! The worst crime is occupying a country — destroying and harming lives — to control its resources…."

    When I finished, several people were nodding in agreement. I got the names and phone numbers of two people, after telling them about PLP. Although I didn’t talk about communism, I did induce the audience to think about this film in a new way.

    Everyone should seek out these kinds of opportunities to bring communist politics into the anti-war movement. The people leading the meetings will never hand them to us. We must be bold and respectful, and build unity. I was nervous and my heart was beating hard, but I did it anyway. We communists have a responsibility to challenge the patriotic liberalism that is being promoted to build a base for U.S. imperialism and fascism. We must train ourselves to be bold!

    Boston Reader

    Red Army Liberated Auschwitz

    January 27 marked the 59th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, the largest and most infamous of the Nazi death camps. A group of Auschwitz survivors went to the site where many of Poland’s 2.6 million Jews were slaughtered by the Nazis and their Polish lackeys, to honor this day and call for world peace. A monument dedicated to the victims of Shoa (the Holocaust) will be completed near the Berlin Parliament by 2005.

    I read a brief report about these celebrations in the NY Daily News and in the Dwelles-World, a German news agency. Neither mentioned the Red Army’s role in liberating Auschwitz and many of the death camps. By Jan. 27, 1945, the end of the Third Reich was only a few months away. The Red Army was advancing swiftly through Poland, headed for Berlin.

    Many people still believe that the U.S.-led Allies won World War II. CHALLENGE has frequently exposed this fraud, but it’s worth repeating. Recently I talked with a young Israeli man living in NYC who considered himself "knowledgeable" in history. He repeated this fraud. He thought D-Day — the June 6, 1944 landing of U.S. and British troops in western France — was the turning point of the war. But by the time Churchill and Roosevelt decided to launch this Second Front, the Soviet Red Army had already decimated most of the Nazi war machine, defeating it at the Battle of Stalingrad in February 1943, at the huge battle between 6,000 Nazi and Soviet tanks at Kursk soon afterwards, and in other battles.

    These lies comprise the anti-communist rewriting of history by the world’s capitalists. Without the Soviet Red Army, history would have been quite different.

    An aspiring historian

    Teacher Salutes Anti-Fascist Stand

    Because I’ve been struggling in my school against the chaos created by the racist school system, the administration has harassed and punished me in many small ways. One was being sent to the New Teachers Workshops (NTW) which occupied me for three full Sundays.

    As part of this ongoing struggle, at the union’s Delegate Assembly two months ago I had championed the defense of activists. At my first Sunday NTW, one teacher told me she had heard me at the Delegate Assembly and we had a little discussion about the school chaos created by the racist capitalist system.

    At the next Delegate Assembly I challenged the resolution to stand silently to honor just the U.S. dead, saying we should also stand for the Iraqi dead, (Challenge, 2/4). At the next Sunday class, this same woman told me that she again had heard me at the Assembly and said, "I wanted to stand with you. It was wonderful what you did. But I was there with a friend and I’m not a delegate."

    By standing up against the forces of fascism we give other people heart. They may not be ready to stand yet, but we must believe that at some point they will.

    A working teacher

    a name="Boycott, Picket Gibson’s ‘Passion’"></a>"oycott, Picket Gibson’s ‘Passion’

    Hollywood actor/producer Mel Gibson is poised to bring out his anti-Semitic movie, "Passion of the Christ," a depiction of the final 12 hours of Jesus’ life. Gibson’s personal hate- and horror-filled version of Jesus’ trial/execution and his rejection of the "liberalized" Roman Catholic Church flood the film. Set to appear in over 2,000 theaters on February 25, the movie should be boycotted and picketed. The controversy already swirling around it should be used now and in the weeks to come to build working-class solidarity and explain how and why capitalism uses its mass media to build fascism.

    Philly Anti-fascist

    a name="‘Community Policing’ Used to Stifle Class Struggle"></">‘C"mmunity Policing’ Used to Stifle Class Struggle

    In CHALLENGE’s Red Eye on the News (2/4), the article, "It helps to act like Reds!" equates Harvard’s Dr. Earl’s theory about crime prevention (N.Y. Times, 1/6/04) with communist practice. I disagree. Can we imagine the American Society of Criminology, the National Institute of Justice, the McArthur Foundation and other government agencies funding $51 million to Dr. Earl to teach people how to act like reds?

    Dr. Earl’s Ten Point Coalition used a group of black ministers with plenty of time and resources to convince some people to act as Homeland Security-style spies and reporters against graffiti scrawlers and teenagers who hang out on the corners. His theory challenges the Giuliani-type fascist crackdown currently used by police here and worldwide which results only in overcrowding the prison systems and creating potentially rebellious soldiers. He proposes instead community meetings to get volunteers to clean up and police neighborhoods, asking kids to rat out crime ringleaders and to "coordinate their activities with policemen" (a possible model for Iraq, using Shi’ite holy men?).

    Dr. Earl says we can solve problems through neighborhood meetings, but most community groups say they need living-wage jobs, smaller class sizes, after-school programs, child care, medical care, affordable housing, places for the homeless, etc. Dr. Earl’s article or theories never mentions these issues or war spending that robs the funds to pay for them.

    From the Vietnam War to the war in Iraq, PLP communists have participated in many community groups, picketing welfare and unemployment offices, leading mass anti-war marches in many cities and pointing out how capitalism was responsible for their neglected neighborhoods.

    To equate Dr. Earl’s pro-cop, stoolie program with how red comrades have worked among the people is either a mistake or a gross error in judgment.

    Red Comrade

    The U.S. as the Fourth Reich

    Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, Republican congressman from Long Beach, California, has introduced legislation that would force emergency room doctors to report and fingerprint any undocumented immigrants they treat. "America has become the HMO to the whole world," he said. "We are taking care of any illegal immigrant who can get to our country and get to that emergency room."

    This means that ER personnel would ask people seeking emergency care, "Do you have your papers?" Most patients without papers would simply stay away — and die. Denying care is clearly the intent of this vicious racist bill. It also seeks to win workers and patients to blame immigrants for the horrors caused by the war budget.

    Every week we hear over the hospital P.A. system, "Code blue, radiology waiting room, 2nd floor." That means another patient has had a cardiac arrest waiting for a bed in our overcrowded, downsized hospital.

    Working in a hospital used by thousands of working-class patients from many countries, I see the next phase of intensifying fascism as particularly ugly for my co-workers and myself. We need to organize to resist and refuse these neo-Nazi proposals before they become law. As we raise resolutions in unions and professional organizations, we must educate those around us about the history of medicine in Nazi Germany. Our friends need to know how the Soviet Red Army eventually ended these atrocities militarily defeating the Nazi army. Must be time to start building a new Red Army.

    Red Doctor

    RED EYE ON THE NEWS

    BELOW ARE EXCERPTS FROM MAINSTREAM NEWSPAPERS THAT CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION:Abbreviations: NYT=New York Times, GW=Guardian Weekly (UK)

    Cop violence not impartial

    Far from being impartial enforcers of the law, New York police officers have historically taken sides against anyone threatening…particular ideas of order and authority — even when that meant clubbing workingmen demanding an eight-hour day or teenage girls striking outside sweatshops. (NYT, 1/25)

    Contracts show war plans

    A spokesman for Kellogg, Brown & Root, a subsidiary for Halliburton, claims that a contract for logistical services for troops in Iraq was awarded two years ago.... This contact…predates the invasion of Iraq by more than a year. How could a company get a contract for an event that had not yet taken place unless it surely knew that it would?

    ….Almost from the inauguration the Bush administration was involved in planning to invade Iraq. (Letter to NYT, 1/29)

     

    US sells out Afghan women

    U.S. support of fundamentalists in powerful positions throughout the country has left Afghanistan’s dreams of freedom dashed, and women far from liberated….

    The moujahedeen do not approve of women leading any part of their lives in public, and harshly intimidate those who think differently….

    The United Nations and international human rights groups recently released reports detailing widespread beatings, kidnappings and rape by these warlords and their militias. And several girls’ schools around the country have been set on fire. (LA Times)

     

    Profits come before health

    Sugars added to food….made up 11 percent of calories in American diets in the late 1970’s; they are now 16 percent overall and 20 percent for teenagers. By itself, that 20-ounce Coke or Pepsi in a school vending machine provides 15 teaspoons of sugars.

    Understandably, industry lobbyists are uneasy about calls to cut consumption of sugars….Threatened by such conclusions, food companies and their friends in government try to…delay action, just as the cigarette industry did for so many years. (NYT, 1/23)

     

    Iraq war long planned

    [Paul] O’Neill, the former treasury secretary fired in December 2002….portrays an administration bent on invading Iraq from day one. "It was all about,… "Go find me a way to do this…."

    When O’Neill goes to see Cheney in November 2002, to try to persuade him that another round of enormous tax cuts favoring the rich could cause deficits of a size that could cripple the country’s long-term economic future, the vice-president tells him….that we won the elections and we can do what we like for our backers….

    The White House response has been to belittle O’Neill…. (GW, 1/29)

    Arab youths losing hope

    Of the 90 million Arab youth today (between the ages of 15 and 24), 14 million are unemployed….There’s not enough jobs and not enough hope," Jordan’s King Abdullah told the Davos economic forum. (NYT, 1/25)

     

    Halliburton dodges taxes

    Halliburton…goes to great lengths — literally to the ends of the earth — to escape paying…taxes to the government that has been so good to it.

    Annual reports…showed Halliburton subsidiaries incorporated in such places as the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, Trinidad and Tobago, Panama, Liechtenstein and Vanuatu….as a corporate tax shelter. (NYT, 1/30)

     

    Women’s wages still super-low

    Equal Pay for Equal Work is the oldest demand in the feminist repertoire….

    In the mid-’60s, women were paid 69 cents for every dollar a man made. After 30 years of struggle and hard work, we now make 74 cents for every dollar a man makes….

    Except, of course, for black and Hispanic women, who are now making 63 cents and 54 cents respectively for every dollar men make. (Molly Ivens, Liberal Opinion Week, 1/12)

     

    Rob Palestinians of water

    More than 80% of water from the West Bank goes to Israel. The Palestinians are allotted just 18% of the water that is extracted from their own land. Palestinian villages and farmers are monitored by meters fitted to pumps and punished for overuse. Jewish settlers…use 10 times as much water per capita as each Palestinian. (GW, 1/28)

     

    US-Pakistan terror tactic

    Pakistan massed several thousand troops….Using a harsh century-old British method, officials handed local tribal elders a list and issued an ultimatum.

    If 72 men wanted for sheltering Al Qaeda were not produced, they said, the Pakistani Army would punish the tribe as a group, demolishing houses, withdrawing funds….

    Pakistani officials…conceded that they had been under intense American pressure to act in the tribal areas. They said they hoped the new approach would prove fruitful. (NYT, 1/31)

    Information
    Print

    CHALLENGE, February 4, 2004

    Information
    04 February 2004 473 hits

    Former Bushite Sharpens Fight Between U.S. Rulers
    LIBERALS SAY BUSH'S IRAQ POLICY ENDANGERS BIG OIL
    Imperialist Rivalry Reaches the Moon and Mars
    Teacher Stands Up For Iraqi Workers
    Using Bosses’ Statistics To Teach Anti-Racism
    ‘Bracero’ Plan A Presciption for Exploitation, Fascism
    Racist Immigration Scheme Reminds Farmworker of ‘Bad Old Days’
    Racist NYC Mayor Turning Schools into Police State
    Explodes Lies About School Violence
    Election Charade Means More Misery for Salvadoran Workers
    Aristide: From Liberal ‘Savior’ to Fascist Dictator
    That’s Capitalism: Execs Profit From Workers’ Health Cuts
    Talk About Robbing Workers: Bosses Steal Women’s Paychecks
    Iraq War Sharpens U.S.-Russian Rivalry Over Oil
    Feudalism or Capitalism? Both Hara-Kiri For Workers
    LETTERS
    Ezploitation Can’t Be ‘Voted Out’
    Racist Jokes Used to Divide Us
    When China Was Red Heroin Gangs Were Busted
    U.S. Bosses Split Over China
    Drug Barons Profit From Flu Epidemic
    Making Communists is Crucial
    Rule of Law Ties Us to the System
    RED EYE ON THE NEWS
    Cutting $ for kids’ health
    ‘Better under Communists’
    Cruel squeeze at Wal-Mart
    US OK’s terror vs. rebels
    America accepts child poverty
    Imperialist war: old story
    Filipino rebel army 10,000
    Another war for Iraq oil?
    US grabbed half of Mexico
    It helps to act like Reds!


    Former Bushite Sharpens
    Fight Between U.S. Rulers

    Former Treasury-Secretary and Aluminum Co. of America (Alcoa) chief Paul O’Neill’s new book, “The Price of Loyalty,” lambasts his ex-boss George Bush for ignoring the wartime needs of the nation’s biggest capitalists. O’Neill complains that Bush’s tax cuts were irresponsible and that his pre-emptive invasion of Iraq was not fully justified. O’Neill’s two purposes are to steer the Republican Party back from the right-wing imperialist neocons towards its liberal imperialist wing and to further the lie that liberal politicians opposed the Iraq war.
    Maintaining Exxon Mobil’s/JP Morgan’s/Alcoa’s worldwide dominance requires costly and ever-expanding military operations. The money must come from taxes. But Bush, seeking the support of other capitalists and investors, reduced their taxes and thereby weakened the war machine.
    The New York Times’ Paul Krugman said O’Neill’s book, “portrays an administration in which political considerations — satisfying ‘the base’ — trump policy analysis on every issue” (1/13/04). The Times later (1/18/04) linked Bush’s cuts to homeland fascism and foreign wars and worried that the shortfall might harm both: “Shortly after the tax cuts, the government’s seemingly inexhaustible surpluses evaporated....Then came the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, followed by huge increases in spending on domestic security and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Projections by Congress and the Bush administration of surpluses of $5.6 trillion over 10 years, the outlook in 2001, have turned into estimated deficits of...possibly as much as $5 trillion.”
    Military strategists are worried, too. The Industrial College of the Armed Forces (ICAF), which plans wartime mobilization, has focused on “Resourcing Grand Strategy” and “Resourcing Nation-Building” for 2004. “Resourcing” is Pentagon jargon for “paying for.” The ICAF makes clear that if Exxon Mobil is to pump Iraqi crude, the Feds will have to squeeze the taxpayer harder: “Grand strategy is really the idea of allocating resources to create in both the short and the long term various instruments of power, instruments with which the nation then provides for its defense and the furtherance of its aims in the world.” (ICAF course outline, 2004)
    For over half a century, the Republican Party has been split over fiscal policy. The liberal wing, once personified by Nelson Rockefeller, urges large government payouts, both for the military and for social programs, to keep the working class under control. Conservative GOP’ers, smaller capitalists who form a significant bloc of Bush’s electoral machine, favor low taxes. Many are right-wing Christians. The day after O’Neill’s “60 Minutes” bash, Christie Whitman, a self-proclaimed Rockefeller Republican, chided Bush for trying “to appeal not to a majority of the electorate but only to the most motivated voters — those with the most zealous, ideological beliefs.”
    Imperialist O’Neill’s “opposition” to the Iraq war — like the pack of Democratic presidential hopefuls — is pure fiction. In 1995, while running Alcoa, O’Neill was a director of the Rand Corporation, a military think-tank. He oversaw its study of the precise troop deployments needed to invade and occupy Iraq. O’Neill’s real beef with Bush about Iraq is shared by liberal leaders of both parties — including Howard Dean: Bush failed to win UN support for the war, which would have spread the costs and propelled an attack with greater, more lethal force. O’Neill and the Democrats also upbraid Bush for launching the war with too few troops.
    The liberal media display similar hypocrisy. Viacom owns both Simon & Schuster, O’Neill’s publisher, and CBS, whose “60 Minutes” broadcast the O’Neill interview. From publishing to broadcasting to movies, Viacom organizes public opinion to favor Washington’s military adventures. Viacom recently elected William S. Cohen, a liberal Republican, to its Board. As Clinton’s Defense Secretary, Cohen directed the 1999 terror bombing of Serbia(See page 8). Last February, he criticized “the administration’s failure, thus far, to convince the world community of the necessity to invade Iraq and use military force to disarm and change the regime.” (Wall Street Journal, 2/5/03)
    O’Neill speaks for capitalists who, for profit, blithely kill thousands of working-class soldiers and civilians. The only sensible critique of Bush is one that exposes the essential deadliness of the profit system and demands the seizure of state power and government by the working class.

    LIBERALS SAY BUSH'S IRAQ POLICY ENDANGERS BIG OIL

    "'Like many other aspects of Iraq, those making policy believed what they wanted to believe about oil, without reference to the facts,' [according to oil analyst James Placke, who took part in a Council on Foreign Relations study about rebuilding the Iraqi oil industry]...An industry expert who briefed [Bush aide] Faith said big oil companies had delivered a clear message that the U.S. could not expect them to plow money into Iraq until the occupying forces had resolved the issues of sovereignty and ownership rights." (Financial Times, 1/16)

    Imperialist Rivalry Reaches the Moon and Mars

    In “The Empire Strikes Back,” (The of the Star Wars movies) Darth Vader ordered the destruction of an entire planet from a space ship the size of a small planet. Well, science fiction might become a reality if capitalism has its way.
    Bush’s plans to return to the Moon is more than an election year stunt, just as there is more than collecting rocks from Mars in the recent landing of the Rover explorer. In February 2001, Geofffrey Briggs, director of NASA’s Ames Center for Mars Exploration, reported that “NASA has been working with Haliburton, Shell, Baker-Hughes and the Los Alamos National Laboratory to identify drilling technologies that might work on Mars.” (www.petroleumnews.com/pnarchpop/010228-49.html)
    NASA is not just a space agency; it’s part of the military-industrial war complex. The space shuttle program is controlled 90% by private military contractors, a process begun in 1996 under the Clinton administration when Boeing and Lockheed Martin received free reign to spend money without any oversight. They’ve been spending it on classified space warplanes like Aurora. The Bush gang sped up that process, appointing NASA directors from the military sector.
    War Secy. Rumsfeld is planning for “Full Spectrum Dominance,” a scheme to guarantee U.S. supremacy in space. It includes the Aurora plane, capable of destroying any “enemy” satellite. It also plans to claim ownership of near-earth space, barring access to any other countries. Bush’s lunar base will be mainly a military one. This implies breaking the 1967 space treaty.
    But other imperialists aren’t taking this sitting down. The Russians, despite all their problems, still have a very strong space program. The Russian Space Agency has just announced it’s ready to send a manned mission to Mars by 2014 (La Vanguardia, Barcelona, 1/15) The European Union is also accelerating its space program. It even landed The Beagle on Mars before NASA’s Rover, although the Beagle malfunctioned once it reached the surface. China just sent its first manned mission into space. It’s also planning a Moon landing for the near future.
    So, if “peace on earth” is now just a hollow saying, don’t expect “peace in the universe.” Capitalism and war go hand in hand.

    Teacher Stands Up For Iraqi Workers

    At the last NYC teachers union Delegate Assembly — at which 175 teachers bought CHALLENGE — the Veterans Committee made a motion to stand in a moment of silence in support of the U.S. dead in Iraq. It passed and the delegates stood. Right afterwards a comrade took the floor and changed the motion, asking the assembly to stand in support of the Iraqi dead.
    Union president Weingarten called for a vote and her “count” declared the membership “against” standing for the Iraqi dead, although delegates at the back of the hall said that at least half of those voting favored the new motion. The comrade, still at the mike, announced that even if nobody else would stand for the Iraqi dead, he would, which he proceeded to do, silently, for about a minute. While he stood, the Assembly and the union president remained quiet.
    Some delegates later said the show of hands looked pretty even and somebody should have asked for a count. Others told the comrade, “Some of us should have stood with you.”
    Many of the 175 delegates who bought the Jan. 21st CHALLENGE when entering the hall for the meeting were interested in the page 3 article about the struggle against the chaos Mayor Bloomberg’s new racist “security” rules have-created in the schools.
    During this period of growing fascism, it is essential to fight the fears that exist in all of us and stand up where we must, while we’re still able. At least two delegates, not part of our extended PL group of members and friends, thanked the comrade for standing.
    Dare to stand, dare to struggle, dare to win.
    A working teacher

    Using Bosses’ Statistics To Teach Anti-Racism

    In the last article (1/7/04) dealing with “Teaching Anti-Racism and Class Consciousness” we saw the power of a class analysis of “race.” But one lesson can’t attune students to this new way of looking at things. Understand it, maybe, but “feel it,” no. So the next class reviews example after example.
    U.S. capitalism produces these “race exclusive” statistics as naturally as breathing. Everywhere charts or tables place blacks and Latinos decisively at the bottom for reading, high school graduation, employment, infant mortality, health issues, poverty, housing and so on.
    Gradually, through examining these charts, confidence in a class analysis develops. The technique of isolating racism from the class society that produces it is exposed. Ironically, in discussing the rare occasion when the Government broke its own rules, our point is proven.
    In 1986, Government data showed death rates from heart disease for black males was 1.2 times higher than for white males; for black females it was 1.5 times higher than for white females. But even further — factory operators (blue collar workers) had a death rate 2.3 times higher than corporate lawyers. The class gap was deadlier than the black-white gap.
    The exception proves the rule. Soon more students begin to understand how a class analysis makes change both urgent and possible.
    At this point we must guard against a new error. Excited by this different way of seeing things, some students want to throw away all race-based statistics and charts. To counter this, and make the final point, I hand out class-based charts we’ve developed (or should have developed) at the beginning of the lesson.
    Students are asked some straightforward questions based on these charts. Who lives longer, a corporate lawyer or a factory operator? Who has health care? Who’s likely to be denied? Then I ask for comments on the society they see in these charts and the role racism plays. But racism plays no part whatsoever in these class based charts. Is that true? “Does racism play no part in our lives,” I ask? Of course, most students are well aware of racism in their daily lives.
    This leads to my final point. Looking at class-based statistics in isolation can distort reality as surely as looking at exclusively race-based statistics. We can argue that, in the last 30 years, U.S. workers have been attacked harder than those in any other advanced industrial country. We work harder, longer, are denied health care more often, meet violent deaths or are jailed at a greater rate and are paid less than our counter-parts in Germany, Japan, Australia or Canada. The cutting edge of each and every one of these attacks has been racism.
    There can be no improvement in the lives of the working class, let alone its liberation, unless we understand how “race” and class interact with each other. Nothing positive can happen without working-class unity. and there can be no unity without an active fight against racism. We need both sets of statistics to truly understand the mess we are in and how to map our way out.

    ‘Bracero’ Plan A Presciption for Exploitation, Fascism

    President Bush’s immigration reform proposal is a step towards war and fascism undertaken by the U.S. ruling class. It will not help any undocumented worker.
    The liberal criticism of the proposal in the bosses’ media says it’s Bush’s attempt to give the Republican Party a more “humanitarian” face and to court the Latino vote for the 2004 presidential elections. But this hides its real purpose.
    The proposal clearly states that one of its four main principles is “to serve the economic interest of the nation.” The bosses’ national economic interest is to provide masses of workers willing to work long hours for low wages with hardly any benefits. Having entered a permanent state of war since 9/11, U.S. bosses need to greatly expand their war production, requiring many such workers — which they hope to get by legalizing the 8 to 12 million undocumented workers.
    U.S. rulers need this state of permanent war to maintain their hold over the vast Mid-Eastern oil riches and their position as the world’s top imperialist. This requires military might. But, with their army bogged down in Afghanistan and Iraq, and maintaining over 700 bases in more than 130 countries, their military is already stretched thin. With more and larger wars looming, where will the extra “boots on the ground” come from?
    They’re offering $5,000 to $10,000 bonuses for soldiers to re-enlist for three years, with the catch that if you’re in a combat zone you can’t leave, even if you’re time is up. But half of the soldiers are not re-enlisting. Since the rulers aren’t yet inclined to reinstitute the draft, they see the large undocumented population and their millions of U.S.-born children as a crucial source of military recruitment.
    Bush’s proposal and other legalization schemes from the bosses, their Republican-Democratic politicians and their sellout union leaders will attempt to lay the political basis to win immigrant and all workers to unconditionally support the bosses’ wars. However, to win them, the bosses are aware they’ll need a better proposal. An LA Times editorial criticized the proposal for not going far enough, but said “the important thing is that Bush has opened a door for the discussion of this policy.”
    It’s a sinister fascist policy to inflict massive death and destruction. Their plans are long range, not conceived yesterday. The 1986 amnesty for undocumented workers aimed to socially assimilate millions of these workers and their children to serve the bosses’ needs.
    Between 1986 and 1998, the U.S. Border Patrol climbed from 2,000 to 12,000 officers; its budget rose from $200 million to $1.3 billion. The stricter border control did not — and wasn’t intended to — stop the flow of undocumented workers into the country. During those years their numbers doubled, from 4 to 8 million.
    The intended goal was to change the pre-1986 situation. Prior to that, 85% of Mexican undocumented workers who entered the U.S. traveled back and forth frequently, to the families left behind. Many eventually stayed home. After 1986, border-crossing difficulties increased, forcing undocumented workers to settle here and bring their families. They are being forced to assimilate in the hope that they will develop the patriotic fervor necessary to slave, fight and die for U.S. imperialism.
    In the last decade this border policy has forced immigrant workers to use more dangerous crossing places, killing over 2.500. How many more will die? Capitalism is a racist, criminal system. It treats us as beasts of burden or cannon fodder for its wars. While our labor enables capitalism to function and our youth comprise the bosses’ imperialist armies, a united working class can turn their imperialist wars into a revolutionary uprising to destroy them and their murderous system. Together we have the collective knowledge to build and run a world based on workers’ needs, not money and profits, a communist world without borders, racism, sexism, fascism and imperialist wars.

    Racist Immigration Scheme Reminds Farmworker of ‘Bad Old Days’

    Bush’s “new immigration” program smells like the bracero program of past decades. Even though under Bush’s proposal they’re called “guest workers,” there’s no clear plan for working conditions, wages, hours, housing, or how much will be stolen as “savings.”
    We’re being sold a pack of lies. The bosses always drive for greater exploitation through lower labor costs. These “guest workers” will fit that scheme perfectly.
    In 1961-62, I worked among the braceros in the lettuce fields of Arizona and California, even though I had a “green card” (permanent resident immigrant). I felt the sadness of being an exploited worker “without God or country.”
    In Glendale, Arizona, the growers played Mexican country music when the braceros were tired, to revive their spirits, but many fainted from exhaustion. They were driven away in a truck to some unknown place, deemed “unproductive.”
    In Central California, the braceros lived in camps without services, washing themselves and their clothes in dirty streams. The food was garbage — just poorly cooked beans and bread, “served” from a metal drum. They were forced to eat standing up, rushing to return to work. This was the original “fast food.” Since I was a contract laborer, I was able to bring my own food, better than the garbage in the drums. I left that company after a fight with a foreman.
    The growers kept a percentage of the braceros’ earnings, supposedly as “savings for the future.” But 40 years later not one has received a dime. How much will be stolen from the new “guest workers” as “savings”? Under capitalism, bosses always give workers the “choice” to “either work under my conditions or screw you.”
    I’m not surprised that many will be taken in by Bush’s new bracero swindle, believing the bosses’ false promises. A contractor used to tell me, “People like to work even if they’re not paid since goats always try to go to the mountain.” All bosses want all workers to be like braceros. If we don’t do something about it, they’ll get away with it again. I urge braceros to join PLP as I did several decades ago when I realized why the bosses exploit us.
    A veteran farmworker

    Racist NYC Mayor Turning Schools into Police State

    NEW YORK CITY, Jan. 20 — Mayor Bloomberg has brought his own “war on terror” into this city’s school system by declaring racist war on the students, as well as on teachers and parents. He told a recent press conference that his Project Impact will “have a cop for every student if need be.” His idea of “leave no child behind” appears to be “put every child behind bars if need be.”
    One Brooklyn student said, “My mother is against this. She says it’s racist and more young kids will get locked up for nothing.” Many teachers, parents and students were outraged about this new plan that will put many more cops into 12 NYC schools as a “pilot program.” IMPACT targets both failing middle schools and high schools in black and Latin neighborhoods and appears to be the tip of the iceberg. Many schools are on waiting lists for this program as conditions continue to deteriorate.
    The media has overplayed incidents of school violence (see page 5). Many schools have been extremely chaotic this semester. Last spring, five Brooklyn high schools were slated for closing, creating terrible overcrowding in many other schools. Students have been literally dumped into schools at the last minute. Teachers have been shuffled around from semester to semester in an indiscriminate manner.
    One of the IMPACT schools, Columbus in the Bronx, was said to have 3,640 students when in fact has 4,400.
    The media has ignored the overcrowding and lack of funding and resources and instead played up various violent incidents. A photo of a student being removed in handcuffs for arguing with security guards made the front page of last week’s New York Times. School Chancellor Klein’s IMPACT memo to the schools says teachers should “monitor the entrances and exits” — in essence, to function as cops.
    This blatant move to turn schools into jails in black and Latin communities is racist and must be opposed by all students, parents and teachers. If this pilot program is not fought, schools will be turned into armed camps where students are viewed as — and treated like — criminals.
    Bloomberg and Klein have blamed everyone, especially students and teachers, for the failure of the school system. They want us to believe that schools are the great equalizers and that our youth can make it if they try hard enough. Yet, clearly the schools are a tool for oppression and maintaining the racist inequities in this society. Scapegoating students will only make it worse.
    Meanwhile, the union leadership, playing its flunky role, welcomed the cops into the schools. The union paper celebrated this program and commended Bloomberg for initiating it. The phony misleader Weingarten gladly posed for a photo as she went through a metal detector at a Bronx high school. But teachers at the union’s Delegate Assembly questioned why the union would support turning schools into jails.
    Billionaire Bloomberg’s racist IMPACT fits right into a system based on profits for the bosses and poverty for the masses, that treats workers as commodities to be exploited to produce those profits. It therefore views working-class youth, especially black and Latin youth, as fair game for minimum-wage jobs, and then gives them the “choice” of unemployment or service as cannon fodder in the bosses’ imperialist wars for oil and world dominance.
    Students, teachers and parents must understand that capitalism has no interest in truly educating our youth but must still fight hard for the resources. Only in a communist society, free of bosses and profits, where no one is viewed as a commodity, will everyone gain a real education to expand the horizons of our class.
    PLP members and friends will advance resolutions against both the cops and the military in the schools and carry this anti-racist struggle into our communities and to the national union convention this summer.

    Explodes Lies About School Violence

    A N. Y. Times op-ed article (1/19) by John Beam, executive director of the National Center for Schools and Communities at Fordham University, explodes the myths and lies being spread by New York City’s Mayor Bloomberg and the bosses’ media about violence in the city’s schools. That Center undertook a study of New York’s 1,100 public schools last year and revealed that:
    • The major crime rate in the schools last Fall were about the same as for the similar period the year before; “Back in December, when the uproar over school crime reached a climax...the origin of all the commotion was really a backlog in processing suspensions, not in any substantial increase in school crime.”
    • “Mayor Bloomberg and the Department of Education are pursuing solutions that fail to address the real problems: long-established...policies that inadequately distribute resources to the schools.... By focusing on individual [crimes], officials are able to ignore deeper problems within the system.”
    • “Schools with fully functioning libraries and modern computers average better attendance. Schools with higher percentages of inexperienced teachers...often tend to have more suspensions.”
    • “Students, regardless of ‘race’ or income, tend to do better in schools with adequate resources [but]....schools with higher enrollments of black and Latino students and lower-income students tend to have fewer of those resources. The city’s policies for distributing essential educational tools have...a...negative impact on these children.”

    Election Charade Means More Misery for Salvadoran Workers

    San Salvador — “You don’t have to tell me about it. I live it every day...” an education worker told a co-worker. “OK, but let me give you some facts and numbers,” replied his friend. “A report from the PNUD [UN Project for Development], said El Salvador is in 104th place out of 174 countries in human development worldwide. It has the second highest level of poverty in Latin America, after Haiti.”
    Another teacher commented, “In Arcatao [Chalatenango, in the north] there are children dying of hunger. The same is true in Tacuba [Ahuachapan, in the west]. Yet in Antiguo Cuzcatlan, site of the U.S. embassy where the richest families live, the level of development resembles European nations.” Capitalism kills without remorse in order to gain maximum profits.
    In the 1980s, when the commanders of the FMLN (the former guerrilla group, now the second largest electoral party) agreed with the death-squad rulers (and their masters in the U.S. embassy) to end the civil war, they promised “peace and prosperity” to the masses. Today, there is no peace — the Maras (criminal gangs) roam freely and terrorize everyone — and no prosperity.
    Fifteen years of deepening capitalist crisis under the fascist ARENA Party has only deepened the poverty of Salvadoran workers. In the rural areas, 84.9% of the workers live in total poverty, less than a dollar a day per family. Since 1994, 40,000 workers have been laid off. In the last Social Security workers strike, three workers died. One committed suicide because she couldn’t repay her bank debts. Meanwhile, the wealthiest groups, especially the banks, reaped more than $6.4 billion through privatizations and the corrupt lending system.
    The current ARENA presidential candidate Tony Saca is a lackey for the local bosses and some U.S. imperialists. He served as president of the National Association of Private Businesses. This organization has systematically opposed even small social benefit concessions to workers and has championed privatization.
    The fmln is the liberal loyal opposition to the ARENA party. They want to sweeten exploitation and poverty with words and “projects.” Shafick, the fmln’s presidential candidate, and the fmln itself, don’t represent the working class. They are nationalists who try to make deals with any imperialist and local boss who will give them a bigger piece of the pie. This election is a fight to decide which section of the ruling class will take control to benefit the section of local and/or imperialist rulers they’re tied to.
    According to the bosses’ polls, “Only 2.4% of the people...believe that the results of the presidential elections will affect the economic situation.” So 97.6% don’t believe in the lies and the promises of the electoral parties.
    But it’s not enough just to be cynical about elections. Capitalism will not die by itself. Workers must be won to the long-term fight to destroy it and build a new communist society. Without revolution, no matter which party wins the election, the capitalist crisis will continue and deepen. Attacks on workers will increase. We must join all kinds of mass organizations to bring them communist ideas about the real solution to this capitalist hell.
    Both electoral parties fear the working class’s potential to end this criminal system of exploitation. Workers in El Salvador and worldwide must unite as one fist, with one flag and one party, the PLP.
    Tired of ‘Liberty’ of Capitalism
    A worker, a friend of PLP, asked, “Do you believe it’s possible that communism will be achieved one day here? I believe it would be a good system for us workers. I think all our needs would be met. We would work, but we wouldn’t have to suffer poverty.”
    “Certainly I believe there will be communism,” I replied. “That’s what we’re fighting for every day.”
    Another worker asked an fmln leader, “Why don’t we fight directly for communism?” “It’s not time yet,” she answered. “What are you waiting for?,” he asked. “For capitalism to kill more workers?”
    The reality is that these capitalists-in-training will never organize a revolutionary struggle. They’ll climb on the capitalist train, using the sacrifice of thousands of fighters who gave their lives for the working class. For years the fake leftists tried to hide their agenda — maintaining the capitalist system. These leaders, parliamentary deputies, ARENA or fmln, are paid $4,500 a month, 31 times the workers’ minimum wage of $144 a month!
    The ARENA and fmln actors in the current election, a farce put on exclusively by capitalism, are contributing to the maintainance of this rotten system which only offers the working class hunger and poverty. Workers are tired of living in the “liberty” of capitalism. In the name of “liberty,” the bosses have exploited, tortured and massacred the working class here and worldwide. That’s why we struggle to build a communist system where the working class enjoys all it produces.
    PLP believes all workers are potential leaders of our class. We must rely on them, not on any fascist or liberal capitalist politicians. The strengths and also the reversals of the Russian and Chinese revolutions have taught us great lessons. Lack of confidence that workers can be won to communism leads to failure. The working class is the motor of the fight for, and maintenance of, communism. We’re conscious of our huge responsibility as a vanguard party of the working class. We call on workers to join CHALLENGE readers’ groups and to join PLP.
    Salvador comrade

    Aristide: From Liberal ‘Savior’ to Fascist Dictator

    PORT AU PRINCE, HAITI, Jan. 20 — Thousands of anti-government protestors marching from the University of Haiti were attacked by the cops; many were injured. Since September, 47 people have died, mostly protesters, in clashes with the cops and paramilitary armed gangs. Haiti is the poorest country in Latin America and one of the poorest in the world. Basic services and jobs are virtually non-existent.
    In 1994, President Jean Bertrand Aristide, deposed a few years earlier by a military coup, was returned to power in a U.S. invasion ordered by his buddy President Clinton. Millions of Haitian workers and their allies believed Aristide was the new Toussaint L’Ouverture or Dessalines. (The former led the slave revolt 200 years ago against French colonialism; the latter defeated Napoleon’s army which tried to recapture France’s richest colony and restore slavery.) The exploited workers and their allies hoped Aristide would end the many years of oppression inflicted by the Duvalier regime and the TonTons Macoutes, as well as those who followed them into power after a mass rebellion in the 1980s forced Baby Doc Duvalier to flee.
    Mass demonstrations of Haitian immigrants in New York City, Miami and Boston demanded that the Clinton government return Aristide to power. CHALLENGE and PLP warned it was a deadly error to trust Clinton and U.S. imperialism or Aristide to “save” the masses. That idea was not popular in those demonstrations.
    The reality of capitalism proved this warning correct. Aristide is now considered even by some of his former supporters a dictator like Baby Doc. His main support comes from the cops and the “chamers” (the new TonTons Macoute goons). “Titid” (as the masses used to call Aristide) totally betrayed the masses. He didn’t fulfill any of the promises he and Clinton made.
    The Lavalas (the militant mass movement which brought Aristide to power) soon split into different factions fighting for their piece of the pie. Now, some of them, along with a section of the businessmen here, are fighting to oust him. Again, following these “anti-Aristide” forces is a big mistake. The workers, peasants and students fighting for a better world are setting themselves up for another betrayal in supporting these bosses and opportunists.
    To carry out the dreams of the slaves who defeated Napoleon’s colonial army and fought for real freedom, the wage slaves of today need to build a communist movement to organize a revolution that can smash all the chains that oppress them.

    That’s Capitalism:
    Execs Profit From Workers’ Health Cuts

    “Damn, look at this,” said an electrician who had been on strike for his medical plan six weeks ago. “Where do they get the money to pay those people?” He was pointing to a local newspaper article reporting that the number of MTA (Metropolitan Transit Authority) executives making $100,000-plus a year had doubled over the last two years.
    He was complaining because we all lost a month’s pay striking against the company’s attack on our medical plan. “They said over and over again they were broke. But they had the money to pay these leeches on the working class.”
    I showed him the letter from last month’s CHALLENGE about the MUNI CEO who received a big pay raise after cutting the bus drivers and raising the transit fares in San Francisco.
    “You’re right to be ticked off,” I said. “They did the same thing here — raised the bus fares on January 1 and cut our medical, how much we won’t know until the arbitration decision later this year.” While the U.S. government has “no money” for health care or education, they’re spending billions for the war in Iraq to control oil profits and supplies.
    We pasted the CHALLENGE letter alongside the local news article about MTA and made copies to pass around the shop. Some went to other divisions.
    These well-paid MTA bosses are the same ones who fought us during the strike. They bad-mouthed us to the press and on TV, increased scab bus service using other transit companies, and developed the plan to hire Prime Time vans as scabs, to carry bus passengers throughout the city. They made a deal with the Teamsters leadership to screw the First Transit workers, ending their two-week strike in order to increase bus service during the MTA strike.
    The bosses will use everything at their disposal to whip us into line, including lying, manipulating workers against each other and using high priced anti-working class, pro-capitalist labor leeches.
    Workers like us create all the wealth for the bosses. Potentially, we have the vast numbers and strength of the whole working class in our arsenal. Our Party has the responsibility to awaken and mobilize the working class to get rid of the leeches and run society for our class.
    Red Transit worker

    Talk About Robbing Workers:
    Bosses Steal Women’s Paychecks

    BROOKLYN, NY, Jan. 21 — Capitalists reap their profits from the labor of workers, paying them less than the value they produce. But some bosses go even further, stealing their workers’ wages outright. Some 40 workers, mostly immigrant Latin women, picketed the Crown Linen company at 43 Hall St. in the Bushwick area, trying to force the boss to give them the two weeks pay he owes them. These workers have been unemployed for two months without any compensation.
    “We’ve been after Charlie Sevenfold [the boss] for two months to pay us what he owes us,” said one worker. (El Diario-La Prensa, 1/18) “He used to change our checks and charge us $3,” said another. “We did it because his checks always bounced. But this time he gave us the checks, knowing he had no funds in the bank. He then said he will pay us in cash but we haven’t seen him all this time.”
    One woman with eight years at the shop said the boss was always moving work to other states, looking for cheaper labor. Most of these workers are single mothers making no more than $8 an hour. This isn’t enough to make ends meet in a costly city like New York. These women workers lived from check to check. Now they’ve joined the ranks of the unemployed in this “jobless recovery” economy.
    The Democrats’ Iowa Caucus and Bush’s State of the Union speech occurred a few days after this demonstration. The Democrats and Bushites have nothing to offer these women, nor millions of other workers, except a future of endless wars, low-paying jobs (if any), a racist immigration “bracero” program to enslave immigrant workers even more, and a police state. This is the “democracy” the bosses offer us. On May Day, PLP will march in Brooklyn for the only real choice workers have: to fight for a society without bosses, communism.

    Iraq War Sharpens U.S.-Russian Rivalry Over Oil

    The U.S. war in Iraq has sharpened inter-imperialist rivalry on several important fronts. Among them, and far from the least, is growing competition with Russia.
    Five years ago, NATO chief Wesley Clark, now a Democratic contender for president, murdered thousands of Serbian working-class civilians, on orders from Bill Clinton. Pretending to defend ethnic Albanians against the tyrant Milosevic, the Clinton-Clark “humanitarian” war machine bombed homes, schools, hospitals, workplaces, refugee convoys, trains and busses. The liberals’ real goal was to stifle Russian bosses’ growing influence in the Balkans, especially their ability to export Caspian and Russian oil through Balkan pipelines to Western Europe.
    Today, however, Clinton’s and Clark’s death campaign seems to have failed the U.S. oil majors that were supposed to profit from it. Exxon Mobil and its allies had long held Western Europe as a captive market. But on January 13, Russia’s Lukoil, closely tied to the rising anti-U.S. forces within the Putin regime, said it was buying Serbia’s Pancevo oil refinery, which Clark’s bombers had blasted no less than 10 times in the 1999 air war. These oil installations comprise a critical hub in a newly-planned pipeline system that will carry Kremlin-controlled oil from Russia and the Caspian region to the Mediterranean. The route will run from Constanta on Romania’s Black Sea coast through Pancevo to Trieste in Italy and will challenge two more southerly lines backed by U.S. and British oil firms.
    Lukoil’s move further sharpens the strategic rivalry between the U.S. and a tightening Russia-Europe alliance. This explains Putin’s open-ended jailing of Russian oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the deposed head of Yukos, Russia’s second-largest oil company. The pretext for Khodorkovsky’s arrest was tax evasion. The truth lies in Khodorkovsky’s plan to sell 40% of Yukos — a controlling share — to Exxon Mobil and thereby give Exxon Mobil a major foothold in the Russian oil industry.
    The competition between Russian and U.S. imperialists includes oil but extends far beyond it. A Lukoil publication praising the trans-Serbian project proclaimed, “...it will radically change the direction of Caspian oil supplies, with EU countries emerging as the main beneficiaries....Russian oil operations in the Balkan Peninsula help the strengthening of European integration.”

    Feudalism or Capitalism?
    Both Hara-Kiri For Workers

    The latest Tom Cruise movie, “The Last Samurai,” is a flashy and exciting movie that romanticizes the war-like Samurai culture and history of Japan while providing some interesting historical context of that country’s class society.
    The power struggle between the forces of feudal Japan and the new bourgeois merchants, who own the railroads and the capital, fuels this movie. One feudal lord has serfs and Samurai at his disposal. Despite being told that the U.S. general Custer was a genocidal egomaniac, he idolizes Custer as a great hero because he “fought to the last man.” This lord is reacting to the development of capitalism in Japan and to the death of the feudal order that has given him so much.
    The new bourgeoisie convinces a derelict U.S. Army Captain, Nathan Algren (Cruise), to come to Japan and fight the feudal forces “opposing progress.” Algren has participated in the genocidal murdering of Native American tribes and is experienced in crushing “native insurrections.” In the beginning of the movie Algren is seen raging against the Winchester Companys’ use of him as a side show at a fair to sell guns. He recognizes that he committed atrocities, but excuses this by claiming he was “just following orders.” He’s plagued by nightmares and becomes an alcoholic to numb his mind.
    Algren loses a battle with his force of poorly-armed and trained peasants fighting the elite warrior Samurai “Japos,” (his racist name for them). He understands it’s his job to crush uprisings. He says he would happily kill the “Japos” for the $500 a month offered him. When captured by the Samurai, he’s given a taste of the life afforded to the feudal nobility and Samurai, and grows to love it. The movie completely ignores the mistreatment and exploitation of the peasants. Algren respects, even worships the Samurai and their fanatical loyalty to their lord and to feudal ideology, relying on the traditional weaponry of that era.
    Ultimately, the superior firepower of the new Japanese army and its U.S. officer “advisors” help annihilate the feudal Samurai, ushering in Japanese capitalism.
    The final scene shows Algren accepting the Samurai ways and thus offering his life to the Emperor. Then the Emperor rejects U.S. trade in favor of Japanese nationalism. He seizes the capitalists’ wealth and resources and says he’ll “give them to the poor,” but we know the profit system better than that. Eventually, the Emperors representing the rising imperialist power of Japan, ally with Nazi Germany during World War 2. Millions of Chinese and other Asian workers and peasants were murdered by the fascist Japanese imperial army.
    Japanese feudalism was a horrible class society. Like many feudal orders, the Samurai system was incredibly sexist; for example, the Samurai leader’s sister is ordered to take in Algren after he kills her husband! Algren sides with this dying society because he feels that spiritually he can atone for killing Native Americans in the service of U.S. capitalism.
    “The Last Samurai,” “Cold Mountain” and “Master and Commander” not only represent Hollywood’s glorification of the endless wars U.S. imperialism is waging but also tells us that the current military superiority of U.S. imperialist enjoys over its rivals is unbeatable. If anyone wants to learn the truth about class struggles in the past, don’t expect it from Tom Cruise.

    LETTERS

    Ezploitation Can’t Be ‘Voted Out’

    The bosses’ press and TV are flooded with articles and newscasts about the coming presidential election, the alleged height of democracy. The Sunday New York Times (1/18) devoted virtually its entire editorial section to how to make this charade even “better,” avoid a repeat of the 2000 election farce with “improved technology,” and expand voter participation beyond the 50% who don’t even go to the polls.
    For the next ten months we’ll be submerged in TV commercials from a bunch of millionaire politicians, spending hundreds of millions of dollars, “explaining” how they’re the one who will “serve the people.” They will not mention that the people they serve are the billionaires who own, control and run capitalist society.
    But a sentence buried in a long article in that Sunday’s Times Magazine section exposes this “democracy.” It describes the uphill battle of one of the tens of millions of workers who live in poverty. A single mother in her fifties, “Caroline Payne works hard. She went to college. She owned a home. So how come she’s making only a dollar more per hour than she did nearly 30 years ago?” — the “grand” sum of $10,000 a year.
    The writer then, perhaps unwittingly, reveals the true nature of capitalist “democracy,” answering his question of why Caroline Payne has been exploited all her life in factories, convenience stores and Wal-Mart. Why she was forced to have all her teeth pulled so she could get Medicaid coverage for dentures (which never fit right), suffered long periods of unemployment, was forced to sell her home at a loss and was unable to get help for her handicapped teenage daughter. “Wages and hours are set by the marketplace, and you cannot expect magnanimity from the marketplace. It is the final arbiter from which there is no appeal.”
    Yes, you can vote Democrat or Republican or Green, or not at all, but you cannot “appeal” exploitation and poverty out of existence. The profit drive is “the final arbiter.” Organizing for communist revolution is the only way to free the Caroline Paynes of this world from the poverty stalking them all their waking hours.
    An old-time red

    Racist Jokes Used to Divide Us

    The French government has banned the wearing of head scarves by Moslem women in French schools. This resembles a similar ban in Turkey and reminds me of a co-teacher who was criticized for making racist jokes about black students. He said he wasn’t prejudiced, but he was advancing the bosses’ ideology. They’re happy when we make jokes about other workers. They use issues like head scarves to divide us. They promote discussions about our alleged “differences” instead of our real similarities.
    In discussing such issues with friends, we should point out their divisive nature in the working class. We should emphasize the need to destroy the capitalists who emphasize “differences” among workers while they promote unity with the bosses.
    Red Teacher

    When China Was Red Heroin Gangs Were Busted

    According to “Warriors of Crime: The New Mafia” by Gerald Posner (1988; McGraw-Hill), the Triads are highly organized Chinese Secret Societies who dominate the multi-billion dollar world heroin trade. There are 300,000 members of Triads in Hong Kong alone.
    Currently, no police or governments have stopped them. They’re bought off, and any cops who attempt to stand up to them have been threatened or killed.
    Posner says the only time the Triads were defeated was when China was communist. Then the whole State and Army attacked them. Under capitalism, that will never happen. There are always bosses willing to launder drug money and invest it in other enterprises, or a CIA ready to make a deal. The only solution, again, is communist revolution.
    Keep up the good work in CHALLENGE.
    West Coast comrade

    U.S. Bosses Split Over China

    “Preparing for Constant War: ‘Corporate Governance’ = Disciplining the Ruling Class” (CHALLENGE, 1/7) was an important article for understanding past and upcoming events. China is another example of disagreements within the ruling class. Managers of major U.S. companies view China as a place to maximize their profits through trade and investment. This includes producing in China to use its cheap labor; investing in China’s production in order to get the Chinese to buy U.S. products and services; and purchasing low-cost Chinese goods. But those U.S. capitalists with a more strategic view worry about China growing into an economic and military superpower. They want decisions made with that concern in mind —for example, about transferring technology.
    Last November, the Chinese government approved purchase of 30 Boeing 737s. Washington Governor Gary Locke helped make the deal, in which Boeing agreed to build the plane’s tail section in China. Boeing has a 30-year history of profiting from working with the Chinese aviation industry (www.BoeingChina.com). But ruling-class strategists are concerned that eventually China will use this technology to compete against U.S. capitalism economically and militarily. “China Takes Off” (Nov.-Dec. 2003 Foreign Affairs, published by the Council on Foreign Relations) notes that even though Germany traded heavily with other European countries, it did not prevent it from going to war with those trading partners in World War I. The article says China, though often compared to pre-WWI Germany, won’t resemble that, but worries that it might.
    Gephardt and other Democrats who push for “pro-labor” and “pro-environment” provisions in world trade agreements are trying to slow the growth of China and other emerging competitors to U.S. imperialism. Bush’s gang doesn’t want anything to interfere with the immediate profits of trade with China. And they especially don’t want China to reconsider its support of the U.S. dollar. The same Foreign Affairs article points out that, “In the last 18 months, China has purchased $100 billion of U.S. government securities....China is funding U.S. deficits for the first time.”
    Recently, in response to pro-independence moves by Taiwan’s governing party, China made it clear it would take advantage of the U.S. military’s pre-occupation with Iraq to invade Taiwan, if necessary. The Bush Administration panicked and persuaded their buddies in Taiwan to turn the volume down, at least for now. But the incident revealed how quickly apparently “peaceful” economic relations can turn into war.
    West Coast reader

    Drug Barons Profit From Flu Epidemic

    Dozens of children have died in the flu epidemic. The flu differs from a cold in that it includes fever, headache, general aches and pains, fatigue and exhaustion. A virus causes it; antibiotics don’t help much. Young children and elderly people are most vulnerable.
    At the peak of the epidemic, the flu vaccine manufacturers reported being out of vaccine. From September to November, pharmacies — both chain and independent — and medical centers mounted vaccine campaigns, costing patients up to $25 dollars a shot. Only those who could afford it got it. Even those with public aid had to pay. Some Medicare patients were covered. Free vaccines were hard to obtain. One had to be on a waiting list of the few city-run clinics.
    Vaccine manufacturers could rightly be accused of being greedy. We could demand more drastic laws, but the laws are drastic enough.
    The capitalists control the government and enforce the laws to their benefit. It’s their system. More than 40 million people lack medical insurance. Capitalists want workers just healthy enough to maintain production and to fight their wars.
    Even reformist countries made an attempt to provide medical care for all. The U.S. capitalists criticized the Chinese capitalists for the outbreak of SARS. Now a similar situation arose right here at home. Under capitalism the worker’s health is not a very high priority.
    Red Pharmacist

    Making Communists is Crucial

    In the letter Challenging CHALLENGE (1/21), “casual reader” says correctly that our communist ideas would be much more effective if explored and analyzed on a personal, interview-style level with workers. I feel that articles containing long Marxist-Leninist quotes could be more instructive if these ideas were related to specific struggles in which our Party is engaged. For example, in the same issue the “Building the Party” article (page 5) was much more enlightening about what is and what could be done than is the “What Is To Be Done” article (page 8). Also, the former article dealt with spontaneity and trade unionism more concretely than either the latter article or the D.C. Metro article (page 3).
    However, I disagree when “casual reader” says we should stop “the constant dispensing of the ills of capitalism in CD” and that we should “lighten up a bit” on the system’s failures. With all its ups and downs, CHALLENGE has been — in a capitalist/revisionist (phoney capitalist) world — a beacon of hope to the working class and myself over many years, It has shown the way to the eventual triumph of communist revolution. It’s true that “Facts alone will not inspire the working class to overthrow capitalism,” but facts combined with creative revolutionary communist practice and the Party’s leadership can and will.
    Long-time reader

    Rule of Law Ties Us to the System

    The bosses push the importance of the "rule of law," mainly to honor and enforce business deals.
    The capitalists' rule of law guarantees they will be free to make money by exploiting workers. A workers' government will not allow people to be exploited.
    Another example: The San Francisco Chronicle (11/2/03) printed an article from the Washington Post reporting that the U.S. government accused three Islamic charities of "supporting terrorism" and legally froze their bank accounts. The law lets these charities use the frozen money to defend themselves against law suits. This drains the money from these accounts, discouraging donations to the charity.
    After nearly two years of investigating, the government has yet to indict these groups. Meanwhile, the charities have wasted millions defending themselves.
    Bay Area comrade

    RED EYE ON THE NEWS

    BELOW ARE EXCERPTS FROM MAINSTREAM NEWSPAPERS THAT CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION:Abbreviations: NYT=New York Times, GW=Guardian Weekly (UK)

    Cutting $ for kids’ health

    While headlines continue to tell us how great the economy is doing....34 states have made potentially devastating cuts over the past two years in public health insurance programs, including Medicaid and the very successful children’s health insurance program known as CHIPS. More cuts are expected this year.
    “Almost half of those losing health coverage (490,000 to 650,000 people) are children....”
    Shoving low-income people, including children, off the health care rolls at a time when the economy is allegedly booming is a sure sign of some kind of sickness in the society. (NYT, 1/9)

    ‘Better under Communists’

    [In Kirovsk, Russia] machinists...complained that their circumstances had diminished under capitalism.
    “Life was better under Communism,” said Aleksandr, 49...The stores are full of things,” he recalled, “but they’re very expensive, and labor isn’t worth a thing.”
    Victor, on the other hand, said the main problem was the long-gone stability of an earlier era of affordable health care, free higher education and housing, and the promise of a comfortable retirement — things now beyond his reach. (NYT, 1/11)

    Cruel squeeze at Wal-Mart

    An internal audit now under court seal warned top executives at Wal-Mart stores three years ago that employee records at 128 stores pointed to extensive violations of child labor laws and state regulations requiring time for breaks and meals....
    Verette Richardson, a former Wal-Mart cashier in Kansas City, Mo., said it was sometimes so hard to get a break that some cashiers urinated on themselves. (NYT, 1/13)

    US OK’s terror vs. rebels

    When Acehnese villagers filed suit against ExxonMobil, accusing it of complicity in the Indonesian military’s atrocities in Aceh, [Washington] argued for dismissal of the suit on the ground that it might discourage Jakarta’s cooperation in combating terrorism. That sends an awful message: as long as the Indonesian government helps protect Americans from arbitrary violence, it is free to impose arbitrary violence on its own people. (NYT, letter, 1/9)

    America accepts child poverty

    The truth is that America tolerates, even accepts, persistent child poverty. Our education system reflects it, as so our tax policy, child care policy and child support policy.
    We say we will leave no child behind, but in fact we continue to drag millions of children behind each year. And they may never catch up and become fully participating members of society....
    Fully one-third of children of single mothers in the United States are not just poor but extremely poor. As the study data indicates, these mothers work....
    Decades of economic growth haven’t lifted the worst-off Americans to a higher standard of living. Ten percent of America’s children are so impoverished that their normal health and growth are seriously at risk. (Washington Post, 12/23)

    Imperialist war: old story

    Current problems mirror some of those faced by the United States during its occupation of the Philippines and Cuba after the Spanish-American War of 1898....
    “We went in the Philippines...and decided to stay, while surrounding that decision with a lot of the same kind of rhetoric that surrounded the Iraqi invasion,” said David Kennedy, a professor of history at Stanford. “We are going to lift them up and usher them into the family of nations. But as soon as we got there, it turned out the Filipinos had ideas of their own.”
    Instead of lifting the Philippines up, the Americans found themselves having to suppress an insurrection, at a cost of more than 4,000 lives. Subsequently, the United States convinced itself that it had to remain in the Philippines to protect its strategic interests. (NYT, 1/18)

    Filipino rebel army 10,000

    The Communist rebellion in the Philippines began 35 years ago. It foundered but had regained strength and, according to military estimates, now counts 10,000 fighters in its armed wing, the New People’s Army....
    In many remote parts of the country, the party functions as the government, providing services and a basic livelihood.
    Hardly a week goes by without two or three gun battles....
    Jim, a 27-year-old former seminarian who has been in the mountains since 1996, said, “The more I see the suffering of the people, the more I am convinced of the justness of this cause.”
    Jim’s wife, his mother, his four siblings and an uncle are also guerrillas. They joined the movement after Jim’s father, a union activist, was abducted by the military. (NYT, 1/5)

    Another war for Iraq oil?

    Kurds wish to retain not only their own armed forces, the pesh merga, but also control over taxing power and oil revenues in Kirkuk and Khanakin, two oil-producing centers that the American occupation does not view as part of the traditional Kurdish region....
    Bremer really lowered the boom on them,” an American official said.... “He told them they’re going to have to be flexible,...and to disband their militias.” (NYT, 1/8)

    US grabbed half of Mexico

    In the United States, almost no one remembers the war that Americans fought against Mexico more than 150 years ago. In Mexico, almost no one has forgotten....
    It took less than two years, and ended with the gringos seizing half of Mexico, taking the land that became America’s Wild West: California, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Utah and beyond.
    In Mexico, they call this “the Mutilation....”
    President James K. Polk did confide to his diary that....”There will be added to the United States an immense empire, the value of which 20 years hence it would be difficult to calculate.” Nine days later, prospectors struck gold in California. (NYT, 1/9)

    It helps to act like Reds!

    Dr. Earls and his colleagues argue that the most important influence on a neighborhood's crime rate is neighbors' willingness to act, when needed, for one another's benefit, and particularly for the benefit of one another's children. And they present compelling evidence to back up their argument....
    Such decisions, Dr. Earls has shown, exert a power over a neighborhood's crime rate strong enough to overcome the far better known influence of "race," income, family and individual temperament....
    Born to working-class parents...Dr. Earls said, "We're saying that community is important....If genetics plays a role, it's got to be a minor role, because the community effects are very robust...."
    Cooperative efforts in low-income neighborhoods...he said, may reap a harvest of not only kale and tomatoes, but safe neighborhoods and healthier children. (NYT, 1/6)
    Information
    Print

    CHALLENGE, January 21, 2004

    Information
    21 January 2004 433 hits

    "Anti-Terrorism" Alerts: Paving the Way for a Fascist Police State

    2003: Good Year for Halliburton, Wal-Mart Deadly for Workers

    a href="#‘Disappeared’ Muslim Immigrants Tip of Patriot Act Iceberg">‘D"sappeared’ Muslim Immigrants Tip of Patriot Act Iceberg

    D.C. Metro Union Election A School For Communism

    a href="#Defend PLP Teacher Who Attacks NYC Rulers’ Racist School Chaos">"efend PLP Teacher Who Attacks NYC Rulers’ Racist School Chaos

    Students, Teachers, Parents Fight Fascist Steel Gate

    a href="#‘Serve the Patients, Fight the Bosses’">‘S"rve the Patients, Fight the Bosses’

    MLA Condemns Fascist Patriot Act, Imperialist War in Iraq

    MLA Conventioneers Soak Up Red Ideas

    a href="#‘National Liberation’ Never Liberated Working Class">‘N"tional Liberation’ Never Liberated Working Class

    a href="#Garment Marchers Indict U.S. Bosses As ‘No.1 Terrorists’">Ga"ment Marchers Indict U.S. Bosses As ‘No.1 Terrorists’

    a href="#Class Conscious Soldiers Can Help Defeat Bosses’ Wars">"lass Conscious Soldiers Can Help Defeat Bosses’ Wars

    Building the Party in the Heart of the Working Class

    a href="#Lenin’s ‘What Is To Be Done’ Makes Revolutionary Politics Primary">Leni"’s ‘What Is To Be Done’ Makes Revolutionary Politics Primary

    Video Review: Robert Greenwald's "Uncovered: The Whole Truth about Iraq"

    LETTERS

    Scaling Hills to Deliver CHALLENGE

    Living In A Society Without Money

    Thanks-For-Fighting-Racism Feast

    Willie Nelson Song: Oil Causes War

    Archives Expose Anti-Stalin Lies

    Challenging Challenge

    a href="#Class Line Exposes ‘Red Scarf’ Lies">Cl"ss Line Exposes ‘Red Scarf’ Lies

    RED EYE ON THE NEWS

    • Saddam was ally vs. Iran
    • Draft Board: Help wanted
    • NY 9/11 detainees beaten
    • Call it Mother of Oil Wars?
    • Profit system = mad cow
    • Racist Thurmond raped ‘family slave’
    • Terrorists at US workplace

    "Anti-Terrorism" Alerts: Paving the Way for a Fascist Police State

    Did you get through the holidays without a major breakdown? Well, along with Mad Cows, the latest Michael Jackson and Britney Spears shenanigans, annoying Xmas commercials, excessive drinking, we had to deal with Code Orange and sky marshals on international flights.

    Most people realize that much of this is political hype by the Bush gang and the media. They are targetting as terrorists the very same crew that the CIA and its allies in the Mid-East and South Asia trained, armed and financed for several decades — including Osama Bin Laden. Tens of thousands of these "holy warriors" were sent by Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan to fight "communism" in Afghanistan. (The fundamentalists hated the Soviets for daring to educate women and grant some rights to poor peasants). After the Soviet Union’s collapse, these holy warriors began fighting each other, while the CIA and its friends in the Pakistani Army created the Taliban to rule Afghanistan.

    Bush Sr. and Clinton sent tens of thousands of these holy warriors to Bosnia to help break it away from the former Yugoslavia. Now Tom Ridge and his Homeland Security Department want to protect us from these same people.

    So on Dec. 23, he declared a "Code Orange" alert. The next level, a Code Red, means that the government is completely militarized and all civil liberties are suspended (a total police state).

    This is the fifth Orange alert since 9/11 (and we still don’t know exactly what happened that day). On Feb. 7, 2003, Code Orange was declared after Colin Powell showed "proof" at the UN that Saddam Hussein had WMDs (Bush recently admitted that WMDs were a non-issue). Powell’s presentation was ridiculed worldwide, but Ridge said, "there were signs Al Qaeda was going to attack." Nothing happened. Later it was shown, by the FBI no less, that it was all a CIA fabrication. Ridge admitted, "Despite the fabricated report, there are no plans to change the threat level." (ABC News, 2/11/03)

    Maybe we will get another Code Orange, or even Red, just before the November elections, and the Bush gang will declare martial law to keep itself in power. General Tommy Franks, former chief of Central Command, said a massive terrorist attack in the U.S. could lead to martial law.

    But the Bushites are not the only ones preparing for this. Clinton’s Hart-Rudman Commission warned that a major "Pearl Harbor-style" attack on the U.S. was probably needed to prepare the population for a police state. The rulers prefer bourgeois democracy, with heavy police-state repression when needed, to fool and rule the masses. Fascism is actually a sign of the system’s weakness, but all the bosses and politicians are prepared to play the fascist card.

    Workers and their allies should also be prepared to organize against the bosses and all their plans. We cannot rely on any of the Presidential candidates running against Bush, nor on their union-hack supporters. We must build our own forces to fight the fascist economic and political attacks we’re suffering. We in PLP have a huge task ahead, in trying to lead this titanic struggle for the future of the working class and all humanity.

    2003: Good Year for Halliburton, Wal-Mart Deadly for Workers

    At the start of 2004, is the economy improving? Most definitely — for Haliburton and Bechtel and Wal-Mart. But for the nearly 20 million jobless, 60% of whom are not even eligible for unemployment benefits? Most definitely not. Nor for the tens of millions trying to exist on poverty wages. The rich get richer and the working class gets poorer because the owners of production — the bosses — keep most of the value produced by the labor of the workers as their profit from this mass exploitation. The producers of that value receive less and less for their labor, if they’re lucky enough to have a job at all.

    This difference in wealth is skyrocketing. According to data confirmed by the Congressional Budget Office (The Nation, Jan. 5), between 1973 and 2000 the average real income of the bottom 90% FELL by 7%. But the income of the top 1% — the owners — ROSE 148%. Even worse, the income of the top one-tenth of 1% rose 343% and the income of the top one-hundredth of 1% leaped 599 percent! This is a class society in its extreme.

    In this "world’s richest nation," in 2003 over 30 million experienced joblessness at some time during the year, but the bosses’ Congress refused to extend benefits an extra 13 weeks for the long-term unemployed. While profits, stocks and productivity — fewer workers working harder — are rising, the jobless "recovery" marches on.

    Hunger and homelessness rose at double-digit rates; 14% of those seeking food were denied due to "short supply." In New York City last month, a record 36,638 people were "housed" in shelters in one night. Low-income households now pay an average of 46% of their income for housing.

    In Michigan, one million people live below the government’s already low poverty line. In Cleveland, welfare benefits have been reduced every month for three years due to the limits imposed under Clinton’s welfare "reform" law. And 90% of the cities surveyed in a December 18th U.S. Conference of Mayors report expect homelessness and hunger to increase in 2004.

    Globally one billon people suffer unemployment and half the world’s six billion population exists on an income of $2 a day.

    Meanwhile, U.S. military spending has reached half a trillion dollars annually. The victims? Tens of thousands of dead Iraqis and Afghanis — not to mention nearly 500 U.S. soldiers. U.S. imperialism is driven to war to guarantee its profits by controlling the world’s most vital resource — oil.

    But the horrors of capitalism/imperialism are meeting resistance. In the largest single-day worldwide demonstration in history, ten million people took to the streets simultaneously last February to protest U.S. rulers’ impending war against Iraq.

    Mass strikes have erupted in country after country — Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Argentina, Italy, China, Dominican Rep., Nigeria, among others. In the U.S., California grocery and transit workers struck over the bosses’ attempts to shift the burden of healthcare costs onto their backs. In Benton Harbor, Michigan, black workers and youth rebelled against racist police murder.

    While imperialist rivals are fighting each other over who gets to exploit the most workers at the lowest possible cost for the highest profit, they are all united on maintaining the system that permits them to ravage the world’s workers. Only one factor can fundamentally challenge the source of all these horrors: a united international working class led by a revolutionary communist party. On May Day 2004, PLP will march for that goal: a society without bosses — communism. Join Us!

    More Misery

    "A broader look at the levels of serious distress being faced by increasing numbers of Americans comes from the latest Index of Social Health, which is published annually….

    "The categories that worsened in the latest index were children in poverty, child abuse, average weekly earnings, affordable housing, health insurance coverage, food stamp coverage, the gap between rich and poor, and out-of-pocket health costs for those over 65." (New York Times, 12/19)

    a name="‘Disappeared’ Muslim Immigrants Tip of Patriot Act Iceberg"></">‘D"sappeared’ Muslim Immigrants Tip of Patriot Act Iceberg

    Imperialists worldwide, especially the U.S., have used 9/11 to make fascist attacks against the working class "the new normalcy" (Vice-President Cheney addressing Republican governors, 10/25/01). This will continue as their "solution" to their never-ending crises.

    Since 9/11, hundreds of Arabs (mostly Muslim immigrants and a few citizens) have disappeared in the U.S. On Sept. 20, 2001, the FBI arrested Mohammed Rafiq Butt of Pakistan on a neighbor’s "tip." He was never charged with a crime, but was ordered deported for a minor visa violation. Rafiq Butt died in a New Jersey jail five weeks later. Prisoners reported he had complained of chest pains but was refused treatment. His corpse was shipped back to Pakistan where an autopsy showed body marks consistent with extreme torture.

    Agents arrested Jose Padilla on May 8, 2002 at Chicago’s O’Hare Airport. He disappeared completely until Attorney-General John Ashcroft announced on June 10 that Padilla had "planned" to detonate a radioactive "dirty" bomb. The following day, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz admitted there had been no actual plot to detonate a bomb. Padilla is still being held without charges, as an "enemy combatant" in a military brig.

    In the fall of 2001, mainstream media, including the liberal New York Times, discussed the need for the U.S. government to use torture to get information.

    Hundreds, perhaps thousands, of workers have been disappeared over the last few years. The government refuses to release their names, their location, or even confirm they’re being held. The courts have ruled that this information "even concerning those found to have no connection to terrorism, was exempt from disclosure." (NYT, 11/3/03) The Supreme Court will consider the matter, but the ruling class manipulates its laws according to their priorities of the moment. If they need to disappear workers legally, they’ll do it. How many of the more than two million prisoners in U.S. jails are there because they were framed by racist cops and prosecutors or were victimized by the "war on drugs"? That "war" puts mostly black and Latin workers and youth behind bars for possession of a few ounces of marijuana or crack cocaine while the big banks make billions from laundering drug profits. We cannot rely on their laws for justice.

    During the Clinton era, the Hart-Rudman Commission laid the basis for the repressive Patriot Act and Homeland Security Department. The new standard operating procedure is: denial of habeas corpus; military tribunals; death penalty imposed by secret military judges; use of secret or no evidence to convict or detain indefinitely; government surveillance and infiltration of community groups and political organizations; organized spying by some workers on others; increased monitoring of e-mail, internet and telephone conversations; denial of legal representation; and stripping of legal and civil rights.

    The Patriot Act defines "Domestic terrorism" as "acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of criminal laws" if they "appear to be intended to influence the policy of a government." The U.S. ruling class is waging war on the same terrorists they trained and used during the past 30 years. The repressive apparatus is capable of inflicting great harm. But the same was true of the Nazis until a Red Army of workers fighting for a communist future defeated them.

    Presently, U.S. rulers are singling out Arabs for "disappearing." They may eventually return to their families — or may be buried alive in secret jail cells similar to our brothers and sisters in Latin America, Apartheid South Africa or Saddam’s dungeons.

    Bosses’ Fascism Can Be Taken

    But Muslim immigrants are not the only ones being victimized. They want us to quietly accept all this, quietly continue to produce profits for them, while we hope they won’t come for us or someone we know. History tells us only communist revolution can crush fascism. The Italians used to say Mussolini killed so many communists until there were two million of them. The red-led partisans defeated six Nazi Army divisions and liberated all of Northern Italy, captured and executed Il Duce, hanging him by his heels. The left-led French Resistance liberated Paris from the Nazis before the Allied Armies got there. Only assembling ourselves under these banners can we defeat and destroy the ruling class. Join the PLP!µ

    (If you have any information about disappeared workers, send it to CHALLENGE.)

    D.C. Metro Union Election A School For Communism

    WASHINGTON, D.C., Jan. 5 — "We activated more people and created the basis to recruit a lot of workers to PLP. If we do that, then it was successful." That’s how PLP member Mike Golash summed up his recent run for President of the 9,000-member ATU Local 689 in the Metro bus and rail system, amid imperialist war and the Homeland Security fascist build-up.

    Mike described how a group of about 35 drivers, station attendants, cleaners and mechanics, led by regular readers and distributors of CHALLENGE, circulated literature, organized meetings, and held discussions with approximately 2,000 workers. Out of that effort, about 1,200 voted for a revolutionary communist to lead the fight to maintain health insurance and pensions, fight racist pay differentials and resist management’s increased attacks. This may have been the most union votes for a real, OPEN communist in 50 years, in the capital of the imperialist world, in the shadow of the White House. "Our base is disappointed that we didn’t ‘win’ the office," said Mike, "but see more clearly the need for a mass political base."

    He said, "We’ve been unable to overcome the workers’ conservative ‘I’ve got a good job’ attitude." But the economic crisis and the political crises of racism, police terror, health care and war have been a process developing over years, and things may be changing. The budget crises of the cities, fueled by the Iraq war and huge tax cuts to billionaires, are leading to privatization of mass transit, which means "more cutbacks and attacks, lots of dark clouds."

    Now the battle shifts to this spring’s contract negotiations, which will take place as the Iraq war drags on and possibly spreads, fascist Homeland Security intensifies and racist terror touches all workers. "The last contract cost Metro $40-$50 million in increased labor costs," Mike said. "Increased pension contributions alone, over the next three years will be over $100 million. It will be impossible for the union to maintain the current contract without a major battle."

    Our job is to build a PLP club, use CHALLENGE to raise the consciousness of the workers, and provide a revolutionary, militant alternative to the sellout union leadership. Mike has carried out this fight for 28 years, as a bus operator and union activist. The response to his election campaign reflects mass confidence in communist leadership that has been earned over decades of struggle. Capitalism can never meet the needs of our class. And while every reform movement is ultimately doomed to failure, this struggle demonstrates that we can build a mass PLP out of the bosses’ mass movements.

    a name="Defend PLP Teacher Who Attacks NYC Rulers’ Racist School Chaos">">"efend PLP Teacher Who Attacks NYC Rulers’ Racist School Chaos

    New York City’s billionaire mayor Bloomberg is instituting more intensive fascist rule in the public school system, marking the overwhelmingly black and Latin student population for his racist attack and then blaming them for the spreading chaos. Education under capitalism is geared to defend the system, both with what the rulers want taught in the classroom and with the "choice" they give students: low-wage jobs that guarantee maximum profits for the bosses, or a military "career" to fight and die in wars to secure world domination for U.S. imperialism.

    Since September this chaos has enveloped hundreds of schools: overcrowded classes, management disorganization, City Council calls for more "student accountability," the bosses’ racist media blaming violence on "out-of-control" students, new teachers struggling to get their pay and health benefits, hundreds of laid-off aides and paraprofessionals awaiting re-hiring, expansion from five large districts to 10 regions accompanied by breakdowns within each region, and mass creation of small schools by dismantling old ones with no provision for the excess students. The rulers figure they can get away with this chaos precisely because racism helps them make the hundreds of thousands of black and Latin students expendable. And the union leadership, never taking up the fight against racism as the key to fighting the bosses, has — in effect — taken the bosses’ side in this struggle.

    The newly-created Department of Education was as poorly planned as the U.S. occupation of Iraq. Bloomberg aims to destroy the teachers union while making a mockery of public education. The ten newly-created regions have no organized format, have no communications between systems or districts and are incapable of handling many necessary functions.

    Last year at my school a program was introduced for ninth graders in which teachers were counselors as well as teachers and were able to give students more individual direction. Even though the class limit of 24 students grew to 34, and even though none of the promised computers and equipment arrived, teachers were involved in day-to-day discussion about — and support for — the students. The absentee rate plummeted and students felt more positive about school.

    This year the program was supposed to encompass the entire school. However, the funding was pulled, forcing the school back to its original format.

    Then we were told the school would close soon and re-open as two or three smaller ones (format to be determined). The students quickly realized that last year’s promises had been broken. They were understandably upset.

    When teachers tried to respond to this chaotic environment by making their classrooms bright and interesting, they faced a disrupted school staff with many new teachers and a new principal and assistant principals. There was no continuity. Within a few weeks children began acting up, accusing each other of "hitting my friend," etc. While there are a number of gangs present, problems escalated because of the broken promises.

    All this was aggravated by Bloomberg’s new detention system. Now a student would be "disciplined" by reporting to an in-house suspension detention room within the school building. With no "cooling-off "period, the fights continued the next day. Some 60 students have been arrested up to five times and returned to the school the following day.

    A few fights led to a buzz throughout the school of how this one fought and who "won," etc. Because of the way they were arrested and then returned to the school, many students feel they were fighting back against the system. The growing anger towards the school led to more fights. Students did not want to enter classrooms. Clearly they felt it was all a joke. The in-house detention room only made it worse. This promotion of pandemonium helps the administration to further blame students and individual teachers. And all many teachers can see are "students in chaos."

    I am a PLP member and teach global history in this vocational school of 1,200 students. I’m an outspoken union delegate with a reputation for blaming capitalism for workers’ problems. Although I have over 17 years of classroom experience with a clean record and satisfactory evaluations, because of technicalities in state rules I am still considered a "new teacher." This denies me tenure, enabling the school bosses to more easily attack me.

    Because I have explained the causes of this boss-created chaos and because when children ran into my classroom I would not give them up to security or anybody — not rat them out — in mid-October the administration began an unrelenting campaign of harassment. In barely a month, seven letters were placed in my file (all being grieved), as well as a complaint — since dismissed — of verbal abuse against a child and an unsatisfactory evaluation. As a "new teacher" three "unsatisfactories" within one semester can cancel my teacher’s license. I would seem like "easy meat," but teachers and students stunned these arrogant bosses.

    At least 15 petitions are being circulated supporting me, three by teachers and 12 by students. One has 200 signatures and another has 150, so far. The students have already submitted three to the principal. The teachers held a rally/party at a local tavern amid a strong expression of unity. Although many teachers don’t agree with me politically, the majority support me, knowing of my devotion to the students, the majority of whom also support me. When the issue was raised at the Delegate Assembly as an attack on activists, it drew the support of the teachers there.

    CHALLENGE sales at the school are still low but we are working to increase them. A number of friends have drawn closer to the Party. The struggle continues as management seems determined to remove me from the school. Our goal must be to turn the growing teacher/student anger into a fight against the racist capitalist system, the cause of this chaos.

    A working teacher

    Students, Teachers, Parents Fight Fascist Steel Gate

    "It stands 10 feet tall, has curved-down spikes, and is made of steel. It’s the new gate in the science building," our school paper reported on its front page about the latest fascist attack on our students. A steel gate INSIDE THE SCHOOL BULDING erected during Thanksgiving weekend has sparked controversy and struggle by students and teachers. This, in turn, has provoked both more fascist attacks on those fighting back, and an attempt at compromise.

    At this writing, the administration has offered to replace the steel gate with a wall and an ordinary door, a prettier fascism. But students will still be treated like prisoners — the administration refuses to allow open exit from the campus. They’re incapable of treating the students with dignity, the purpose of the school is to train these young people to be capitalism’s wage slaves and, increasingly, cannon fodder in imperialist wars. Only in a communist society will schools be run by the working class for our own benefit, as places where young and old can learn how to build a world where work will be for the good of all, not for the profits of a few.

    When the gate was put up, students and teachers alike were shocked. Dozens of teachers and hundreds of students signed petitions opposing the gate because it makes the school look like a jail and is a hazard in case of fire or earthquake. These petitions and student activism forced the administration to call an open meeting where all concerned could comment on the gate. PL students and friends circulated a leaflet calling on students and teachers to "fight the fascist gate." We explained how it was part of the move towards a racist, fascist police state. It gets students used to being treated as criminals, and to the discipline of a factory or the army, and it also prevents class struggle such as past walkouts students have organized against racism and imperialist war. It’s one of a series of fascist attacks in our own school: drug-sniffing dogs in the classrooms and the city attorney coming to the leadership class asking students to become snitches for the cops, helping to add to the over two million already in prison, mostly black and Latin workers and youth.

    At the meeting, the administration said the gate was built to keep outsiders off campus and to prevent student walkouts. Students eloquently argued that they should be treated with dignity as students, not as criminals. They said the gate was an insult and an attack. Parents were divided. Some supported the students, saying the gate should be removed. Other parents backed the gate — or a door if possible — to ensure no outsider could enter the campus. Teachers spoke on both sides, although a majority who came said the gate was not conducive to an educational environment and should either be taken down or replaced by a door.

    Some staff members defended the gate and attacked the student activists and PLP. Before the meeting, they were heard reading the PL leaflet in a mocking tone. They’re nervous about being called fascists and about the issue of fascism being raised at all. Then, during the meeting, a member of the security staff accused the students present of being criminals and ditchers (cutting class). These students, frustrated at being attacked and then prevented from responding, walked out.

    As we go to press, the administration, realizing it both created more controversy than it wants, and that the fascist nature of the educational system was exposed, has offered to replace the gate with a door — a prison without bars. The struggle to remove the gate will continue, but the real victory is not merely changing the way the prison looks, but in students, parents and teachers understanding that capitalist schools will always be jails — both physically and in imprisoning the mind with bosses’ ideology — and joining PLP to fight for a communist future.

    a name="‘Serve the Patients, Fight the Bosses’"></">‘S"rve the Patients, Fight the Bosses’

    As healthcare workers in this large eastern city take hit after hit, PLP members and friends are organizing campaigns that go beyond narrow trade unionism, not only concerned with our wages, benefits, and working conditions, but address the general attacks on patient care. One union member described it as, "Serve the patients, Fight the bosses." Such discussions always lead to exposing capitalism, in a period of war and fascism, as the source of these attacks. From Iraq to the USA, the profit system is making life worse for the working class.

    This city’s eighth largest hospital is slated to close in March, scrapping 1,000 jobs, including 600 union workers. The closure was announced shortly after more than 200 nurses ended their strike against mandatory overtime, okaying a tentative agreement. The bosses claim that caring for uninsured and under-insured patients is too costly. The mostly black workers from the surrounding working-class area will have to seek care elsewhere.

    Black workers suffer worse health problems due to racism. Our mostly black local union membership will now have to pay co-pays for prescriptions, making racism even more deadly. The ordering procedure is so complicated that many union members will need assistance or risk doing without their medicine.

    While the rulers will have spent $150 billion of workers’ money to control Iraqi oil, our pension benefits — the only thing keeping many of our members from an old age mired in poverty — will be cut in stages. The older workers are worried about how they’ll survive. The younger ones are certain they’ll have no pensions at all.

    At one hospital, rank-and-file workers and union delegates are going beyond narrow trade unionism by organizing a blood drive "to show our commitment to patient care." Other members are organizing a fashion show to strengthen union solidarity, especially among younger members. The planning meetings have introduced some of the older union activists to the younger generation. The former have benefited from many useful fashion tips while learning of the younger members’ surprisingly strong distrust of the union leaders. Some of the show’s organizers are also trying to integrate it more to reflect the multi-ethnic membership.

    Last summer and fall, there were several racist and sexist conflicts between black women workers and the mainly white nurses and doctors. In one case, union members leafleted and organized a march, causing the offending nurse and her supervisor to "leave" the hospital. This campaign led two doctors to "voluntarily" apologize to the union members they’d mistreated. Workers followed up with a proposal for orientations to all incoming staff, to "put a face on the jobs we do," and challenge the racism, sexism and elitism dividing union members from nurses and doctors.

    These anti-racist campaigns sparked discussions with several black doctors who’ve experienced racism and tried to combat it. They believe the hospital’s lack of black doctors and nurses discourages black students from attending the hospital’s medical school. A union committee will meet with an administrator about these issues.

    Out of these varied activities we have formed several discussion groups, involving workers at various political levels. All of them are activists with ties to other workers. Most importantly, all these groups generate the introduction of anti-capitalist, pro-communist ideas, already stimulating a modest increase in CHALLENGE sales. More of such events will follow.

    MLA Condemns Fascist Patriot Act, Imperialist War in Iraq

    SAN DIEGO, Dec. 30 — Delegates to the 2003 Modern Language Association (MLA) convention overwhelmingly and enthusiastically approved initiatives advanced by the MLA Radical Caucus. These motions and resolutions follow proposals by the Radical Caucus and others for the MLA to aggressively advocate for academic labor justice and against racism, fascism, and imperialist war.

    By huge majorities, the Delegate Assembly passed resolutions endorsing cooperation with other academic organizations to reverse the systemic exploitation of part-time, "contingent" labor; opposing the U.S. government’s pro-imperialist war rhetoric; demanding repeal of the fascist Patriot Act; attacking federal funding of the imperialist war in Iraq and calling for withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, noting that such funds should be spent on education and other human services.

    An "emergency" resolution condemning Title VI of the Higher Education Act (HR 3077) was approved 72 to 3. HR 3077 seeks to establish an International Education Advisory Board and thereby censure both teaching and scholarship in foreign languages and in areas such as Middle East Studies. This would both stifle research by approving only those projects friendly to U.S. imperialism; and guarantee the steady flow of cadre into the Foreign Office of the U.S. State Department and the C.I.A.

    PLP members and friends should be gratified with these results. During the convention, over 150 CHALLENGES were sold to MLA members (see adjoining box), many to anxious graduate students desperate for employment in a system which seeks to decrease the number of tenured, full-time professors.

    A new organization of radical caucuses and left-wing formations across different academic disciplines has recently met to serve as a clearing house for movements opposing academic sexism, racism, fascism and cooperation with imperialist war efforts. Only our own timidity and fear can hold back such a movement. It opens the door to PLP’ers winning academics to communist politics and to ally with the working class in organizing for a revolution which eliminates exploitation and where education serves working people.

    MLA Conventioneers Soak Up Red Ideas

    A group of PLP members and friends drove to San Diego during the holidays to sell CHALLENGE at the Modern Language Association’s (MLA) national convention. We hadn’t done this before and didn’t know what to expect, but we found the English professors and graduate students very interested in — and some seem to be in search of — revolutionary ideas. We distributed over 700 leaflets and distributed 150 papers for which we received over $50 in donations.

    Many conventioneers were impressed that a group of young people like us had such focused answers. A lot of young MLA participants took leaflets and CHALLENGES. We discovered many of the young participants were looking for jobs that only 30% may get.

    Many professors were happy to discuss the war in Iraq and the Democrats. Often one would declare opposition to the war and to Bush, leading to a discussion about whether the Democrats or revolutionary communism was the answer.

    We found that some conventioneers who didn’t slow down for a leaflet would stop dead in their tracks to buy CHALLENGE when offered a communist paper. These people didn’t lack political openness, just knowledge of PLP and its ideas. This is CHALLENGE’s role. There is vast openness for the paper and for communist ideas. We hope we helped expand a presence for the paper and the Party in the MLA, as we are trying to do in our mass organizations on local campuses.

    a name="‘National Liberation’ Never Liberated Working Class"></">‘N"tional Liberation’ Never Liberated Working Class

    The old communist movement waged titanic struggles to achieve a society without capitalist exploitation. Unfortunately, its right-wing errors destroyed that movement and gave U.S. imperialism a clear path to commit murder and mayhem worldwide. These primarily "right opportunist"errors have many forms, but all reflect the deadly delusion that workers need a political "half-way house" short of communism to prepare them for "the real thing."

    Historically, "communism light" had two overlapping versions. One was socialism, which, despite its many remarkable accomplishments, committed the fatal flaw of preserving capitalist social relations in the form of wages. Socialism was somehow supposed to transform society into communism. The other version was "left" nationalism, or "national liberation." According to this theory, communists would lead the fight against the "main" oppressor, usually a colonial or imperialist power. All forces in society who had a gripe against the "main" enemy were enlisted in this fight, including the so-called "national" bourgeoisie of local bosses who wanted a bigger share of the pie than the colonialists or imperialists were willing to give.

    In the 20th century, national liberation movements led by communists inspired hundreds of millions of workers to fight heroically for the wrong goal. Tens of millions died in epic battles against fascism and imperialism. Spearheaded by the Red Army, the Soviet working class ground Hitler’s Nazi hordes into dust. Led by their own Red Army, millions of Chinese peasants and workers drove out the Japanese imperialists and the U.S.-backed Chiang Kai-shek fascists. The Vietnamese people first fought and defeated the Japanese, then drove out the French colonialists, and finally paralyzed the supposedly invincible U.S. military. Similar developments took place in Algeria against French colonialism, in a number of sub-Saharan African countries against colonialism and U.S. imperialism, in South Africa against apartheid, and elsewhere.

    Yet after all this heroism and sacrifice, the international working class still labors under the horrors of the profit system. The former Soviet republics are all capitalist nations. Russian bosses are scrambling around to rebuild a modern version of the old Czarist empire. Chinese rulers have embarked on a long-range plan to replace the U.S. as the world’s chief imperialist power. In Vietnam, nationalist politics have today given Ford, Nike and other U.S. investors the opening that all the fire-power in the world couldn’t create 35 years ago.

    The old communist movement’s capitulation to nationalism also unintentionally opened the door to a deadly new phenomenon: Islamic fundamentalism. Initially, it was used as an anti-communist tool, serving U.S. imperialism but now it is a weapon serving capitalists opposed to U.S. bosses. Iran’s holy rollers were the first to seize this opportunity. Now others have entered the fray, most notably bin Laden & Co., who represent a wing of capitalist Saudi malcontents anxious to change the present alliance between the Saudi royal family and Exxon Mobil. There are others. We can’t identify the forces conducting the guerrilla war in Iraq against the present U.S. occupation, but they clearly reflect nationalist ambitions to control Iraqi oil riches.

    Many people around the world correctly despise U.S. imperialism and Bush. This is good. The class hatred exhibited internationally by tens of millions of demonstrators when Bush & Co. launched their Iraq adventure in February/March 2003 was an encouraging sign. But class hatred against the so-called "main enemy," no matter how justifiable and sincere, leads into a fatal trap unless it’s accompanied by uncompromising opposition to ALL bosses, big and small. Bush is bad, but bin Laden & Co. are no better just because they’re in competition with him. Sharon’s a murderer, but Arafat and his successors have a similar agenda for maximum profit. The apartheid gang were ruthless killers, but now that "black capitalism" rules in South Africa, the masses continue to groan under the yoke of horrible oppression. The current gang of Chinese bosses has developed an expertise in slave labor that the Japanese imperialists and Chiang would have envied.

    It’s the same story wherever the old communist movement conceded to nationalism. The movement’s collapse has left billions of workers vulnerable to the lie that a "lesser evil" can exist among bosses. Communists today face no more important task than the exposure and demolition of this concept. The job is difficult and complicated, but it can be done.

    Our own Party’s limited experiences prove that nationalism’s triumph isn’t eternal. As CHALLENGE reported (1/7), a PLP leader received 1,200 of 4,100 votes in the Amalgamated Transportation Workers Union (ATU) Local 689’s recent presidential election. The PLP’er is white. Black workers comprise 80% of the Local’s membership. These workers have been as greatly subjected to nationalist culture and ideology as anyone else in the U.S. Yet approximately 1,000 black workers voted for a white communist presidential candidate. CHALLENGE will offer a detailed analysis of this campaign in other articles. The point here is that an uncompromising communist position can overcome many obstacles, including nationalist illusions.

    The PLP’er has befriended and led these workers and fought shoulder to shoulder with them for 28 years. They know that he and the Party are on their side. He has regularly sold them CHALLENGE. He has patiently and persistently explained the PLP’s position on revolution, imperialism, fascism, racism, nationalism and the role of the working class in society. The vote doesn’t necessarily mean these workers are ready to join our Party in large numbers. Some should join soon; more may join later. We are still in a period where hard work yields modest results at best. But this vote is nonetheless a resounding victory for the idea that workers will respond positively to the basic truth about capitalism and communism and that they are prepared to follow the lead of communists who stand behind a principled revolutionary position.

    Nationalism wins when communists cave in to it. The working class has already paid too high a price for this surrender. The ATU Local 689 election campaign should inspire us all to begin 2004 and the May Day organizing period with renewed confidence in the working class and in our Party’s line that nothing less than communism will do. With this line, billions of workers will one day change the world.

    a name="Garment Marchers Indict U.S. Bosses As ‘No.1 Terrorists’"></">Ga"ment Marchers Indict U.S. Bosses As ‘No.1 Terrorists’

    It was evident here in Los Angeles that there is a great potential to organize for the real interests of the international working class inside the mass movement. The majority of the 200 workers in my garment factory didn’t go to work. Although only ten of us went to a march organized by a group of garment workers, those who did go were elated with the action that defied the bosses. Several days later PLP distributed a leaflet at the factory exposing the boycott as a bosses’ trick, led by the liberals to give immigrant workers the dangerous idea of trusting the Democratic Party politicians and their capitalist system. PLP’s alternative was the fight for communism. The leaflet sparked many good discussions among the workers.

    The march had several positive effects on myself and my friends. First was the workers’ militancy. Second was a speech at city hall, attacking the bosses’ profits as the source of racism and exploitation and calling for unity with workers in China and Central America to fight the imperialists.

    Afterwards we continued marching to the Placita Olvera (Central Plaza for Immigrant Workers) where hundreds of boycotters were gathered listening to music on a live radio program in Spanish. We moved through the middle of these hundreds of workers who applauded and chanted our slogans. The radio announcers raised the volume of the music to try to drown out the demonstrators, but the workers continued chanting the slogans, forcing the radio announcers to "offer" two of the demonstrators the chance to give "short speeches."

    One said, "To see sweatshops we don’t have to go as far as Honduras or China. Here, two blocks away, the center of LA is full of sweatshops." And "To see terrorists, we don’t have to go to the other side of the world. Here the U.S. government is the number one terrorist. U.S. bosses during the last decade killed hundreds of thousands of workers in Central America and today are killing thousands all over the world. Our goal is to unite to fight against racism, fascism and exploitation."

    The hundreds of workers applauded, chanting slogans like, "Workers struggles have no borders," and, "The workers, united, will never be defeated!" Such bold actions provide fertile ground for communist ideas.

    Rebellious Garment Worker

    a name="Class Conscious Soldiers Can Help Defeat Bosses’ Wars">">"lass Conscious Soldiers Can Help Defeat Bosses’ Wars

    Soldiers have played a major role in wartime to change the course of history. In the Russian Revolution communist soldiers organized fraternization between Russian and German troops, fought against the abuse of soldiers and sailors and ultimately led the working class in open armed revolt against Russia’s rulers.

    In pre-revolutionary China, communist-led soldiers supported worker/peasant rebellions. Years of communist organizing inside the military combined with the objective conditions of imperialist war and sharpened class struggle, led to these revolutionary developments.

    In 1941 hundreds of thousands of men and women were inspired by the fight against fascism to join the U.S. Army. When World War II ended, tens of thousands of soldiers refused to stay in the Philippines to fight against the Filipino communist-led movement and demanded to be sent home. In one demonstration, 30,000 soldiers marched against the military brass.

    The Vietnam war witnessed the triumph of political commitment over technology. Politics was decisive on both sides. The Vietnamese, lightly armed ,with no air support, but with great political commitment to anti-imperialism and socialism, took on helicopter gunships, tanks, heavy weapons, napalm and horrific bombing attacks, and endured tremendous hardships necessary to wage a successful guerilla war.

    Meanwhile, U.S. soldiers, alienated from their imperialist mission, up against a resolute opposing force and politically influenced by the mass anti-war movement in the U.S., undercut U.S. rulers’ efforts to seize Vietnam.

    However, soldiers can also do much harm to the working class. The Nazis fielded an army committed to their fascist masters and murdered millions. The U.S. Army in Vietnam, before imploding, killed millions.

    Soldiers can shape history. Developments during major wars are rarely pre-ordained. Imperialism’s horrors World War I — poison gas, tanks and airplanes used as killing machines — were eventually rejected by thousands of soldiers from different countries. The Russian soldiers turned that nightmare into the most significant event of the 20th century.

    In the current period of prolonged imperialist war, especially over control of Mid-East oil, the soldiers’ role will be crucial. So far they have — for the most part — followed orders to kill other workers in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere. But there have also been encouraging signs of resistance.

    In Israel hundreds of soldiers have refused orders to kill Palestinian workers in the occupied territories, while pilots have refused to carry out assassinations. While possibly reflecting a moralistic rather than a class outlook, it’s positive that soldiers are deciding what’s right and wrong, and refusing racist orders.

    In Iraq, some U.S. soldiers have told the press they want to go home and it’s been reported that many have gone AWOL. A commander of a small reserve unit is being prosecuted for refusing to sign a waiver allowing the military to send his unit to Iraq less than a year after they’d returned from Afghanistan. He wouldn’t make the four enlisted men in his unit go who didn’t want to. Several dozen Bulgarian soldiers have just refused orders to serve in Iraq.

    But these small developments won’t mean to much without the political leadership of a communist movement that gives class consciousness to these spontaneous actions. Only communist ideas will give soldiers the ability to liberate themselves and the working class from the rulers’ imperialist wars. CHALLENGE can play an important role in giving this leadership. In the past, communist ideas have inspired soldiers to refuse orders to kill for imperialism but instead to side with the working class. This can happen again.

    Building the Party in the Heart of the Working Class

    "Listen; someone from our area proposed I run for shop steward" said a transit worker to a comrade. "I like the idea, but I need to know what you think." The comrade answered that he’d think about it and discuss it with other workers who are CHALLENGE readers.

    The next day we asked the closest workers, CHALLENGE readers and members, to come to a meeting to discuss this worker’s candidacy. At lunchtime in the brake shop, the workers came — more than we expected. An open discussion developed, with workers at different political levels, but under our leadership.

    Everyone agreed we need new union leadership. Some made suggestions and jokes about the candidate, but in essence everyone thought he was a good choice.

    However, we made it clear that it was important for a new leadership to be different, that the only way to get the kind of leadership workers need is by understanding revolutionary communist politics. Then we proposed to let this particular election pass and prepare for the next elections. The candidate agreed with the majority who thought this was the best path.

    Collectively we decided that to train him we need a study group every two weeks at lunch time; that he participate in political activities and class struggle inside and outside the union; that he visit workers in other areas of the company; and that he read and write for CHALLENGE. Since then, we’ve had three study groups and now have a larger network of CHALLENGE readers.

    In one study group, inside a bus, some workers said, "It all sounds good, but how can we guarantee that this time the same thing that happened in Russia and China doesn’t happen again?" A comrade answered that the only thing guaranteeing that communism succeeds and is maintained is precisely the massive participation of millions of workers, not as obedient followers but as leaders capable of making decisions and able to distinguish a good line from a bad one. They must recognize when the party takes a wrong turn.

    Someone else explained that socialism in Russia and China didn’t fail only because of the leadership, but also because they had the wrong political line. Socialism left intact many of the bases of capitalism — money, wages, wage differentials, and even worse, production for the market, which means exploitation. Our idea is that after workers seize power with the bases ready, we’ll install communist practices from the beginning. That’s why it’s so necessary today to study revolutionary history and theory.

    We emphasized the importance of becoming more committed to the Party, to ensure that CHALLENGE is read by more workers. Slowly but surely the distribution and readership of the paper has been increasing. The other two study groups dealt with "Reform and Revolution" and the "Economic Crisis of the Capitalist System."

    Some time ago I read a revolutionary novel describing a factory called Putilov in which the workers trained themselves politically inside the factory. To me this action seemed impossible. But today, based on our modest experiences, I think it’s possible, and that the workers are winnable to communism. Our victory only depends on whether we take seriously our great task of giving leadership to the workers, of leading them to take state power through a mass PLP.

    A comrade behind the wheel

    a name="Lenin’s ‘What Is To Be Done’ Makes Revolutionary Politics Primary"></a>"enin’s ‘What Is To Be Done’ Makes Revolutionary Politics Primary

    "…Party struggles lend a party strength and vitality; the greatest proof of a party’s weakness is its diffuseness and the blurring of clear demarcations…"

    (From What Is To Be Done title page)

    The struggle against reformism (revisionism) is a life-and-death question for the world’s workers. The international communist movement has been waging it since it began. A principal reason the old movement collapsed was its vacillation over putting revolutionary politics above reformism. We in PLP are trying to learn from the achievements and errors of past revolutionaries. V.I. Lenin, leader of the 1917 workers’ revolution in Russia, which freed 1/6 of the world’s surface from capitalism, sharpened the struggle against opportunism in his 1902 pamphlet "What Is To Be Done?." This work remains on the "must-read" list of all those interested in the political and organizational tasks necessary for communist revolution.

    Lenin had planned to deal with three questions: "the character and main content of political agitation, organizational tasks, and the plan for building, simultaneously and from various sides, a militant, all-Russia organization." A more active Russian working class and the stiffening resistance of reformist elements within the Party forced Lenin to expand on his original theme. "The exposition of our views on the character and substance of political agitation developed into an explanation of the difference between trade-unionist politics and Social-Democratic politics [the latter phrase denotes "communist politics" or "the Party’s line"] while the exposition of our views on organizational tasks developed into the difference between the amateurish methods which satisfy the Economists, and the organization of revolutionaries which we hold to be indispensable. Further, I advance the ‘plan’ for an all-Russian political newspaper…"

    Fight To Learn, Learn To Fight

    Lenin was essentially a nineteenth century writer. His sentences are long and complicated, requiring concentration. Further, understanding Lenin requires some knowledge of the events of his day. Nonetheless, generations of revolutionaries have drawn a great deal from this communist classic.

    "Talk about serious things in a serious manner…," said Lenin, concerning the training of "worker-revolutionaries." Our Party has fought for the working classes’ right to know everything from Shakespeare to mathematics. What can be more serious for a worker than the theory and practice of communist revolution? We have a collective duty to overcome any obstacles to understanding "What Is To Be Done?"

    Still Burning Questions Of Our Movement

    After exposing those in the Party who hid from principled struggle under the slogan "freedom of criticism," Lenin turned to combating spontaneity. Lenin’s distracters criticized him for "belittling the significance of the objective or spontaneous element of development." (All italics from here on are Lenin’s.)

    "There is much talk of spontaneity," Lenin answered. "But the spontaneous development of the working-class movement leads to its subordination to bourgeois ideology… for the spontaneous working-class movement is trade-unionism…and trade-unionism means the ideological enslavement of the workers by the bourgeoisie. Hence, our task…is to combat spontaneity, to divert the working class from this spontaneous, trade-unionist striving…and to bring it under the wing of revolutionary Social-Democracy."

    In the next chapter, Lenin predicted revolutionary Social-Democratic workers would confront those who worship spontaneity. "…We are not children to be fed on the thin gruel of ‘economic’ politics alone; we want to know everything that others know, we want to learn the details of all aspects of political life and to take part actively in every single political event," Lenin envisioned they would say. He then argued subservience to spontaneity was at the root of terrorism as well as trade-union Economism. He called for "comprehensive national political exposures" as an antidote.

    To bring such comprehensive political knowledge to the workers, communists "must go among all classes of the population; they must dispatch units of their army in all directions." (Here Lenin noted that the Social-Democrats should beef-up their military work.) Communist consciousness was brought to the workers "only from without…the economic struggle."

    From this, it follows a communist party must be organized differently than a trade union. A communist party must "raise the level of amateurs to the level of revolutionaries," which can function under any-and-all conditions.

    "The fact is that society produces very many persons fit for ‘the cause,’ but we are unable to make use of them all," Lenin concluded, protesting that Economist ideology hindered the training of political leaders and organizers. He asks how best to "serve" the mass movement. Building an organization that can produce communist political leaders to bring the Party’s line to the mass movement was his answer.

    Lenin devoted his final chapter to the plan for a national newspaper to serve as a communist organizing tool.

    This brief summary is no substitute for reading the original.

    PLP constantly struggles with the concept of making revolutionary politics primary , as against burying our ideas in reformist politics. The "Economists" Lenin fought believed that trade unionism would automatically lead to revolution. We immerse ourselves in all the struggles waged by workers and others, but see our primary role as "winning them to communist politics." Since capitalism is based on exploitation of workers, it cannot be reformed. It is now 102 years since "What Is to Be Done?" was written and capitalism is only capable of producing endless wars for profits, fascist/racist terror, mass starvation, jobless recoveries, etc. The old communist movement failed because of its own weaknesses, but it has demonstrated that a better world is possible. We have a long way to go, but communism is the only way out of this hell.

    Video Review: Robert Greenwald's "Uncovered: The Whole Truth about Iraq"

    "Uncovered" is insightful for what it presents and what it neglects. It wants to ensure that the anti war movement stays firmly wedded to electoral politics and the multi-lateralists in the Democratic Party and doesn't become anti-imperialist, embracing an anti capitalist critique of U.S. imperialism and revolutionary communist politics.

    The video consists almost entirely of interviews with retired officials from the CIA, Pentagon and State Department. It's sponsored and widely circulated by MoveOn.org, a pro-Clinton group formed during his impeachment period and now adopted by billionaires George Soros and Peter Lewis, who each donated $5 million to promote the video and build support for the Democratic nominee in the 2004 presidential election.

    The intelligence veterans are sharply critical of the reasons given by Bush & Co. for the U.S. invasion of Iraq. They are pro-imperialists who favor a multi-lateral approach. Most of their points were made before this by journalists and activists, including the Institute or Public Accuracy and the new book "The Five Biggest Lies Bush Told us About Iraq."

    A fifth of the video champions patriotism, saying it's "our patriotic duty" to criticize Bush & Co., its main point. Its greatest insights are what it doesn't say about the war. These veterans of U.S. intelligence agencies present a chilling portrait of exactly how the multi-lateralist branch of US imperialism, would run U.S. foreign policy. Meanwhile:

    • They never mention the words oil or oil profits, nor the U.S. drive for broad geo political control of the Middle East, nor its new bases in Iraq, nor the neo cons' aim to fortify Israel's hold on the West Bank and Gaza, nor why virtually the entire U.S. government and corporate media enthusiastically lined up behind the war.

    • They ignore the fact that the two countries with weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in the Middle East are Israel and the U.S. and that the latter not only reserved the right to use nuclear weapons against Iraq but had surrounded it with military bases and naval fleets while openly stating it was preparing to attack Iraq. Thus, the actual military threat was exactly the opposite the one Bush and Congress proclaimed.

    • They don't explain that the U.S. attack on Iraq had three phases - first, the 1991 Gulf War; second, the decade from 1992 to 2003 with its deadly sanctions, almost daily bombing runs and vast missile attacks prosecuted by the Clinton administration, all of which devastated Iraq and killed over 1,000,000 Iraqis, according to UN estimates; and thirdly, the current military invasion. (The video completely overlooks these crimes of the Clinton administration, especially since those interviewed not only supported the Clinton/Bush, Sr. administrations' policies, but were then government officials who designed and implemented these policies.)

    • The video never mentions the Carter Doctrine, a formal U.S. policy committed to military force to assure access to Persian Gulf oil, nor U.S. support of Saddam Hussein and his Baath Party with extensive weapons, food, and intelligence for Iraq during the during the '60s, '70s and '80s when the movie's interviewees were enthusiastically pursuing careers as U.S. intelligence agents and military officers in the Middle East.

    • It also omits the long history of U.S. support for other repressive regimes throughout the entire Middle East in order to control the region's energy resources.

    • Finally, it virtually ignores the anti war movement and the ten million who took to the streets worldwide.

    It's clear why George Soros so extensively supports MoveOn.org and promotes the wide distribution of this movie. He and kindred spirits realize that the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq has led to increased resistance. They want to channel this opposition back into the electoral system, especially to support the liberal Democrats.

    "The Whole Truth About Iraq" could have been more aptly entitled, "How to Hide the Whole Truth…."

    LETTERS

    Scaling Hills to Deliver CHALLENGE

    "This paper seems to be written by prophets," said a worker in El Salvador referring to the analyses in CHALLENGE the last several years about the war for oil profits in the Mid-East. The confidence workers here have in our newspaper is more evident every day.

    A "young" comrade of 73 walks through the hills as much as two kilometers taking the paper to other comrades. She said, "I do it because the revolution needs it." She added that during the past war she lost four children, "but I have others to continue the struggle."

    "I’m donating $5 for CHALLENGE," said another worker, "because I know it’s needed to move forward." He’s paid poverty wages but understands the need to contribute financially to CHALLENGE and to fight for communist revolution.

    Comrade from El Salvador

    Living In A Society Without Money

    For about ten years, we lived without money. I’m a farm worker, born in Morazan, El Salvador, like working with PLP and support the Party’s ideas and activities. I can’t read or write, but still help distribute CHALLENGE.

    During the armed conflict in the 1980’s, I was 13 and had to leave the country for El Refugio, Colomoncagua, Honduras. I participated in the work with the other women — 7,000 of us — in the Guerrillas’ camps. Some of us made tortillas for the old people, children and fighters wounded in battle.

    The men who were able stayed in El Salvador fighting with the armed wing of the FMLN. We now know the leaders weren’t fighting for the goals we thought they were.

    Everyone in our community shared what we produced. There were neither rich nor poor. I cared for children. Others were involved in making shoes, clothes, and tools, in carpentry, ceramics, and in taking care of chickens and pigs. There were also children’s centers, but when we were old enough and conditions were right, we joined the armed struggle.

    We learned to live collectively; to share our food and distribute medicine, housing, clothing and all the basic necessities.

    We never used money all those years in exile working together. Without money, the working class will live better. One can live very well without money. We didn’t own private property, just our hands. Our idea was to work for those most in need.

    Now after the "peace accords," after they’ve given each farm worker a small plot, life’s become much harder. In the best of cases, we only have enough to eat once a day. Prices rise constantly. This is the desperate reality of our lives. We must fight together along with PLP to build a society based again on sharing and living without money.

    Salvadoran Farm Worker

    (Editor’s comment: Thanks for your letter, showing that workers like yourself have been, are, and can be motivated by political rather than material incentives.)

    Thanks-For-Fighting- Racism Feast

    Lots of food, people and political discussion marked late November’s Thanks-For-Fighting Racism Feast in Maryland. For over fifteen years workers and students come together to see old friends, make new ones and renew their activist spirit. We raised $200 for the defense of Ines Weiner (CHALLENGE, 12/5). While enjoying the delicious food, the group also was very focused on the anti-racist politics.

    A mother spoke poignantly about the brutal murder of her son by the Prince Georges’ County police. He was shot 14 times while sitting cuffed in the front seat of a police cruiser wearing nothing but cut-off shorts and shoes. She was a founder of the Prince Georges County People’s Coalition for Police Accountability, which is currently leading the effort to get cop Charles Ramseur indicted for the shooting of Desmond Ray in the back and paralyzing him last year. (Ramseur was not indicted last week by a Grand Jury, but the struggle continues.)

    High school students related their anti-war activities, featuring a forum packed with students and teachers who brought their classes. On the day the war started, they organized a picket line and a walkout.

    A Howard Univ. graduate student urged the crowd not to give up on friends and co-workers who might be pulling back from the struggle, advising them to maintain ties — "they will return."

    Activists fresh from the American Public Health Association meetings in San Francisco recounted two successful endeavors — to refuse to collaborate with Homeland Security and the police (not turning in undocumented workers who come in as patients) and refusing to participate in a smallpox vaccine campaign aimed at building war fever. (See CHALLENGE, 1/8/04)

    The final speaker, a Metro bus driver, spoke about the U.S. ruling class aim to stay in Iraq to maintain control of oil routes. He explained that workers’ futures lie in getting rid of capitalism, the system responsible for more racism, imperialist wars, joblessness, and inadequate health care. He said communism is the only solution that can stop this madness, where workers’ power will rule led by the Progressive Labor Party.

    Workers left satisfied in both body and spirit, Renewed and refreshed, ready to intensify the struggle against racism.

    D.C. Anti-Racist

    Willie Nelson Song: Oil Causes War

    Willie Nelson just came out with an anti-war song titled, "Whatever Happened to Peace on Earth." He endorses Kucinich, the most anti-war of the Democratic Party candidates. Willie’s politics, of course, are limited by liberalism. But what’s interesting about him, as well as the Dixie Chicks, is how popular they remain even after they sharply opposed the war. It indicates the tremendous depth of anti-war sentiment among the working class, including sections we tend to think of as conservative.

    The first stanza of Nelson’s song, while liberal, cites oil as the reason the Bush Administration went to war. Later he clearly refers to Bush as a "damn liar." Many of the most popular books, as indicated by the N.Y. Times non-fiction best-sellers list, are liberal attacks on things we say are endemic to capitalism — war, poverty, tremendous inequality — but which they say are the result of conservative policies. Al Franken’s and Michael Moore’s books are #3 and 4, respectively, on the Times’ list at this writing. (Moore’s is the better of the two; he at least attacks Clinton’s policies.)

    Several people I know — family members and co-workers — have read these books, praise them and want to talk about them, which I’m very happy to do. These authors make many good points, which we can agree with, although we need to constructively point out the limitations of their analysis. We should also, myself included, be writing reviews of liberal protest culture for CHALLENGE.

    An anti-war and anti-capitalist reader

    Archives Expose Anti-Stalin Lies

    All the "revelations" in Soviet government and Communist Party files, secret of course during the Soviet era, DISprove all the anti-Stalin stuff. Stalin comes across as not only a good leader but, as a person, one of the very best imaginable! A few specifics:

    • There is NO evidence Stalin was anti-Semitic. A few books claiming this all lie, often in very obvious ways. For example, Stalin opposed the "Doctor’s Plot" arrests in 1952. He never murdered Solomon Mikhoels, and the "Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee" was certainly involved in Zionist organizing, for which it was disbanded. The trial transcripts have been published and confessed in some detail to this.

    • Many of Khrushchev’s specific statements about Stalin made in his ‘secret speech’ in 1956 and again in ’61 have been proven to be lies. Probably they all are. But Khrushchev had his agents go through many archives, taking materials out and destroying them. They left notes — "X pages removed" — so Russian historians today know this happened. They don’t know what was taken out, but presumably stuff that contradicted Khrushchev’s anti-Stalin stories.

    • Many interrogations — pre-trial, investigative stuff — of the major defendants in the three big "Moscow Show Trials" of 1936 to ’38 have been published (many more haven’t been). They show conclusively that these guys were all guilty; they admit it in detail and accuse each other.

    • They also involve Trotsky. There are a few INDEPENDENT pieces of documentary evidence of Trotsky’s involvement with the Japanese fascists. Nothing so far about his involvement with the Germans, except:

    • The confessions of Tukhachevsky and some of the other top-level generals who were accused of plotting to overthrow the government in collaboration with the Germans and Japanese in 1937 have been published in part. All of them directly implicate Trotsky, as do the interrogations of the defendants in the "show" trials.

    • General Pavlov was executed in 1941 for opening the Ukrainian Front to the Nazi invaders. The trial transcript has been published. Parts have been quoted in a number of Russian-language books and articles. Pavlov was convinced the Nazis were unbeatable — they had just whipped every power in Europe in record time — and so he wanted to make himself useful to them. He refused to pass along commands from the General Staff about getting his armies into battle formation on June 18, four days before the invasion. He had also discussed doing favors for Hitler with another general, Meretskov (who wasn’t executed), in 1940. This one general’s betrayal cost the USSR millions of deaths and captives, and Pavlov admitted this!

    • The Soviets did all they could to help Loyalist Spain during the Spanish Civil War. They did not execute "traitors," as they have been widely accused of doing, and in fact supplied to Spain more arms than even the Spanish gold could pay for.

    • Beria turns out to have been a very good guy also, probably Stalin’s right-hand man. Khrushchev & Co. murdered him, probably because he wanted to "democratize" the USSR by getting full-time Party functionaries out of power. These are the people who took over under Khrushchev & Co.

    Stalin, with all his faults, mostly only evident now in hindsight, was a great communist leader. Our Party is founded on that insight — that the errors of the USSR were political errors, not caused by "crazy, corrupt, murderous" leaders.

    Red Historian

    Challenging Challenge

    Within the letter, "Look Forward to Challenge" (12/17/03), the author asks: "Do we need a greater variety of articles so the paper touches more aspects of people’s lives?" I admit I’m not a careful reader of every article, but the titles are a good indication of the content — i.e., analysis of the economic and political consequences of U.S. foreign policy, Medicare, education, war, etc.

    While such analyses may help foster an understanding of capitalism, what is lacking are articles which give due attention to other human issues — i.e., love; a father-son relationship; dealing with the feelings from the loss of a loved one; the loss suffered from a fragmented childhood; or a beautiful sunset. Maybe these issues have been discussed, but how often are they explored, not analyzed, on a personal or human level?

    In fact, here’s an idea: When such an issue as Medicare is analyzed from a Marxist perspective, more vitality can be contributed to the article with a personal interview. Instead of accepting or refuting statements from bourgeois pundits with a counter analysis, ask the elderly what are their opinions of the new bill.

    Our current reality is capitalism, but still there are positive experiences between people which lend hope and optimism. There’s also some good in the world; despite hardship, people still have options to improve their personal lives via meditation, an AA meeting, a better diet or a good dosage of stand-up comedy In the least, the constant dispensing of the ills of capitalism within CHALLENGE probably do not have a good overall psychological impact on the mind. If I’ve had a bad day at work or am in a bad mood, I feel better reading something from the Twelve Steps tradition.

    Despite my spirituality, I’d like nothing more than the elimination of the ruling class. But I think it’s in this paper’s interest to lighten up a bit on the overemphasis of capitalism’s failures. Facts alone will not inspire the working-class to overthrow capitalism.

    A casual reader

    a name="Class Line Exposes ‘Red Scarf’ Lies"></">Cl"ss Line Exposes ‘Red Scarf’ Lies

    I’m a high school teacher required to teach the memoir "Red Scarf Girl," part of the new National Center for Education and the Economy (NCEE) "Ramp Up" curriculum. New York City recently adopted the NCEE program as part of its city-wide literacy initiative.

    This memoir is a bourgeois young girl’s perspective growing up during the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution in China. This anti-communist book was chosen for purely political reasons, an example how the system teaches politics through literature. The literary quality is very poor; students really don’t find it interesting.

    I taught this book by spending a week discussing communism, reading Chinese poetry, putting daily quotes from Mao’s "Red Book" on the board for analysis, and reading excerpts from "Fanshen" by William Hinton [about the commune movement in China]. In retrospect, I should have taught some of Mao’s poetry as well as Li Po’s, Tu Fu’s and Wang Wei’s. I also discussed the principles of an egalitarian society, asking students to write their idea of the perfect society. Their descriptions were all parts of communism.

    This opened up a lively discussion on why communism "failed" and why they were taught communism was such a bad thing. I explained that at one time a billion people lived under socialism, and that socialism was reversed after having been established by workers.

    I discussed class differences, enabling my students to then determine that Ji Li, the book’s protagonist, was bourgeois. They picked out the class differences between Ji Li and her classmates and realized that by having a larger apartment, more money and a housekeeper, she had greater advantages than her classmates and had a great deal to lose to the Red Guards. They understood how socialism was — and always will be — reversed, that a direct fight for communism is needed.

    After finishing the book’s first two chapters, my students hated it. I then switched to another text, stating this one was far superior to "Red Scarf Girl." The principal agreed to the change, leading another teacher to follow suit. Now none of the NCEE English teachers in my school are planning to teach "Red Scarf Girl.

    A great teacher’s aid would be a pamphlet on the Red Guards, a collection of Mao’s poetry, some proletarian memoirs portraying the working class’s experience under the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, and the advancements made in Socialist China. Other help on teaching "Red Scarf Girl" would be greatly appreciated. (Anybody with information on the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, please submit same to the CHALLENGE office.

    A Red Teacher

    RED EYE ON THE NEWS

    BELOW ARE EXCERPTS FROM MAINSTREAM NEWSPAPERS THAT CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION:Abbreviations: NYT=New York Times, GW=Guardian Weekly (UK)

    Saddam was ally vs. Iran

    Saddam Hussein "ranked with the world’s most vicious dictators." Let us not forget that the United States took advantage of this man’s talents in the 1980’s to further its own foreign policy goals.

    I wonder how much evidence that demonstrates our previous collusion with this monster will be deemed "top secret" during a future war crimes trial. (Letter to NYT, 12/16)

    Draft Board: Help wanted

    President Bush and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld won’t go near the subject — at least not on the record. But in November the Pentagon placed a notice on its Web site seeking "men and women in the community who might be willing to serve as members of a local draft board."

    Hmm. Why have draft boards if a draft is out of the question?

    After the notice set off alarms, it was hastily pulled from the Web site without explanation.

    The explanation is easy to figure out. It is well documented that morale has been plummeting among troops being asked to serve long tours in Afghanistan and Iraq….

    In a recent poll in Stars and Stripes, a respected newspaper for the military, roughly half of the soldiers surveyed indicated they would not re-enlist when their tours ended. (Hearst Newspapers, 12/4)

    NY 9/11 detainees beaten

    Videos recorded inside a New York jail show Arab and Asian detainees, who were picked up in a sweep of immigrants in the wake of the September 11 attacks, being slammed and bounced off the prison walls by guards, according to an official US government report….

    Across the country, more than 1,200 people, mostly Arabs and Asians, were detained on immigration violations after the 2001 explosions and held while they were investigated for possible links with terrorist groups. None was ever charged with terrorist-related crimes. (GW, 12/31)

    Call it Mother of Oil Wars?

    A drum roll, please: It’s time to announce the results of the Name That War Contest….

    Some people suggested that instead of Operation Iraqi Freedom, this is "Operation Iraqi Liberation." I thought they were hawks until I recognized the acronym: OIL. Also on the petroleum front, Peter Wilson of Pennsylvania offered "Mother of Oil Wars…." And movie buffs urged Operation Kick the Dog," "The Empire Strikes Out," "Apocalypse Right Now…."

    Scholarly readers…suggested "Pre-emptive War I," leaving room…to continue the series if [moving] on to Tehran and Pyongyang." (NYT News Service, 12/1)

    Profit system = mad cow

    At least 150,000 downer cattle — those who because of injury or illness cannot walk — were sold annually…. Selling damaged cows for human consumption never sat well with Mr. Behling, who in 2001 briefly had in his feed lot the Holstein cow identified last month as the downer with mad cow disease.

    "It’s an absurd practice," Mr. Behling said….caused by maybe a certain amount of greed…."

    In the 1990’s, meatpackers bought machines that were able to strip a few extra pounds off carcasses while saving millions in labor costs….The extra meat was sometimes laced with nerve tissues, where mad cow disease can incubate. But…getting rid of the machines would mean a loss to the industry of more than $130 million a year….

    For years, the industry had a simple strategy: Fight proposals that would crimp its ability to squeeze as much revenue as possible from each cow….

    The United States Department of Agriculture is by no means the first body to be captured by industry groups. In Europe and Japan the spread of the disease was facilitated by the repeated failure of government ministries to act on behalf of consumers. (NYT, 1/5)

    Racist Thurmond raped ‘family slave’

    There may not have been a more lowly and vulnerable position in Edgefield, S.C., in 1925 than that of a teenage black maid.

    But that was how Essie Mae Washington-Williams’s mother, Carrie Butler, was employed when she and a young Strom Thurmond, the scion of a powerful white family, had what Mrs. Williams described as "an affair…."

    But…the word "affair" makes it too simple — …intimidation was organic to that time and place….

    "White men were king," said Valinda Littlefield, a professor of African-American history at the University of South Carolina. "She was basically a child. He can do with her what he wants. She’s more or less the family’s slave." (NYT, 12/21)

    Terrorists at US workplace

    Workers decapitated on assembly lines, shredded in machinery, burned beyond recognition, electrocuted, buried alive — all of them killed, investigators concluded, because their employers willfully violated workplace safety laws….

    They were not accidents. They happened because a boss removed a safety device to speed up production, or because a company ignored explicit safety warnings, or because a worker was denied proper protective gear.

    And for years…senior officials at the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration….have repeatedly pledged to press…for criminal charges against those responsible.

    These promises have not been kept….

    OSHA’s reluctance…persisted even when employers had been cited before for the very same safety violations. It persisted even when the violations caused multiple deaths….

    There have been repeated efforts to make it a felony to cause a worker’s death. But strong opposition from Republicans and many Democrats doomed every effort.

    (NYT, 12/22)

    Information
    Print

    CHALLENGE, January 7, 2004

    Information
    07 January 2004 432 hits
    This is a three-week issue of CHALLENGE. We will resume a bi-weekly schedule in 2004. We hope all our readers, friends and comrades have a revolutionary NEW YEAR!

    The CIA Got Their Former Agent, But War Rages On
    Saddam Was a Paid Agent of the U.S. Intelligence Services
    Communist Wins Big Political Victory in D.C. Metro Vote
    Nationalism Another Bosses’ Tool Used vs. Workers
    Fight Racism and Nationalism
    How PLP Broke with All Forms of Nationalism
    Nationalism Helped Destroy Old Communist Movement
    Boeing’s New Jet A Trojan Horse To Screw Workers
    A Boss Is a Boss Is a Boss
    No Secret Negotiations, Just ‘Informal Discussions’
    Only Revolutionary Politics Will Do
    Boeing’s CEO Crashes; Pentagon Reined In
    Fight Militarization of Health Care At APHA Convention
    Teaching Anti-racism and Class Consciousness
    California Grocery Strike: Class Struggle Sharpens Political Debate
    California Comrade
    Immigrants’ Anti-Racist March Challenges Nationalists’ ‘Patriotic’ Strategy
    Workers Fight Layoffs, Take Over Baltimore School Board
    Will Bring Anti-Imperialist Stand to MLA Convention
    Who are the Main Murderers?
    Communist Leadership Crucial to Mass Movements
    PLP Leaflet in Italy Attacks Government-Boss Gang-up
    Against the Attack by the Government and Bosses’ Federation
    Increasing Military Spending To Control Oil
    Colombia’s Oil Workers Fight Boss / Union Traitor Privatizing Plan
    LETTERS
    Joblessness a Mass Killer
    Use CHALLENGE to ‘Connect the Dots’
    ‘Over’ vs ‘More’ Consumption
    $1 More Won’t Put Dent in Poverty
    RED EYE ON THE NEWS
    Israel trains US vs. Iraq
    Scratch a liberal, find Bush
    Wal-Mart exploits Mexicans
    Need medicine? Bring money!
    Bosses muddy the Red label
    An empire has no morality


    The CIA Got Their Former Agent, But War Rages On

    The capture of Saddam Hussein is being touted as a “major victory” for the Bush-Blair-Rumsfeld gang. But, like previous “victories” in Iraq, it could easily turn into its opposite. Right after the murder of Saddam’s two sons, we heard the same “victory” song from the White House. The British daily The Guardian (12/15), says this won’t end the attacks on the U.S. forces, quoting Toby Dodge, an Iraqi specialist at Warwick Univ. and the International Institute of Strategic Studies: “I think [the capture] will mean increases in attacks of U.S. forces over the next few weeks to show they are independent of Saddam.”
    The fighting will continue because Saddam’s capture can’t resolve the growing contradictions sharpened by the U.S-UK invasion and occupation of Iraq.
    While Bush and the liberals continue to wrangle over the tactics of extending the U.S. empire there, the U.S. military is conducting a vicious reign of anti-civilian violence. Unable to stop the expanding guerrilla attacks against its soldiers, the military has resorted to a version of a plan that already backfired in Vietnam and is now backfiring in Gaza and the West Bank.
    The plan consists of “wrapping entire villages in barbed wire,” “imprisoning the relatives of suspected guerrillas” and “destroying buildings where suspected guerrillas are suspected of planning or mounting attacks” (New York Times, 12/7).
    This “plan,” which amounts to nothing less than terrorism against whole populations, has been used for years against Palestinian workers by the fascist Israeli army. The Israelis in turn got it from the U.S. “Strategic Hamlet” scheme in Vietnam, which herded entire villages into concentration-camp conditions.
    Empire-building has always contained a large element of indiscriminate violence against civilians. Two thousand years ago, one historian wrote of the Romans in Britain: “They create a wasteland and call it peace.”
    However, neither the U.S. nor the Israeli military is bringing peace to the areas they terrorize. Both groups of bosses are creating the conditions for anti-imperialist “people’s war” against them. The key missing ingredient is a revolutionary communist party in Iraq and the Middle East capable of directing mass hatred of the imperialists into a long-range struggle for state power. The political disarray of Palestinian and Iraqi workers is due in large measure to the collapse of the old communist movement and the rise of dead-end religious fervor and nationalism as organizing strategies.
    But slowly and, perhaps, more quickly as time goes by, the imperialists’ atrocities are paving the way for the rise of a new communist movement. The U.S. military’s racist contempt for Iraqi workers is as disgusting as it is blatant. The New York Times (12/7) quotes a U.S. company commander as saying: “You have to understand the Arab mind. The only thing they understand is force — force, pride, and saving face.” This fascist oaf obviously doesn’t know enough history to realize that 1,000 years ago, some Arab countries had public lighting and sewage infrastructure while European countries were still in the Dark Ages.
    For all their firepower, economic clout and political influence, U.S. rulers seem to have learned nothing. One of the more grotesque events during the Vietnam War was a comment made by a U.S. officer after his company had devastated a village and massacred most of its inhabitants: “We had to destroy the village in order to save it.” Now we get the 2003 version of this cynical absurdity, from the brilliant mind of U.S. Colonel Nathan Sassaman: “With a heavy dose of fear and violence and a lot of money for projects, I think we can convince [the Iraqis] that we are here to help them” (NYT, Dec. 7).
    Terror and bribery remain the imperialists’ only two methods of relating to the populations over whom they would rule. They don’t have enough money to bribe everybody, and the more people they kill, the more they will have to keep on killing. The number of U.S. soldiers now in Iraq is a drop in the bucket compared to the number the bosses will eventually send to conquer and hold Persian Gulf oil, not only in Iraq but also in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere. One hundred thirty thousand U.S. military personnel are now in Iraq, but only 56,000 of them are combat troops. As Le Monde Diplomatique points out (Dec. 2003), New York City alone has 39,000 cops. The present ratio of U.S. troops to Iraqi workers doesn’t exactly favor the U.S. Therein lies the “dirty little” secret explaining why liberals like Hillary Clinton and the New York Times now clamor for a deal with French, German, and Russian bosses that will spread the occupation burden around.
    In the last analysis, the U.S. will keep sending troops to Iraq and other Persian Gulf countries. The U.S. no longer has real allies, only rivals with whom it can strike occasional tactical deals. The main outlook is for war, war and more war, regardless of the party in the White House.
    Imperialism breeds war and terror. A new communist movement must be built so that our class can take the offensive in the face of mounting imperialist terror and eventually launch a peoples’ war for state power. The imperialists are sure to do their job by continuing to spread mayhem. We must do ours by helping the PLP grow wherever it can.

    Saddam Was a Paid Agent of the U.S. Intelligence Services

    The U.S. government began building up Saddam 44 years ago, trained him, helped install him in power, armed him, supplied him with the ingredients for bio-terror weapons and gave him military assistance during the Iran-Iraq war. From 1959, when Saddam was 22, until 1963 when he was part of a CIA-inspired coup approved by President John F. Kennedy, Saddam was a paid CIA agent in Baghdad, Beirut, Cairo and then back in Baghdad where he “presided over mass killings” of communists and became “head of...the secret intelligence apparatus of the Baath Party.” (UPI, 4/11/03)
    • 1979: “Saddam seizes power with U.S. approval, moves allegiance from Soviets to USA in Cold War.” (GregPalast.com; Palast is author of N. Y. Times bestseller, “The Best Democracy Money Can Buy.”)
    • 1980: Saddam “invades Iran [now ruled by anti-U.S. Ayatollah Khomeini] with U.S. encouragement and arms.” (Palast)
    • 1980’s: President Reagan removes Saddam’s regime from official U.S. list of state sponsors of terrorism, establishes full diplomatic relations with Iraq and sends Donald Rumsfeld twice as special envoy to Saddam to negotiate for U.S. corporate suppliers.
    • 1984: U.S. Commerce Dept. issues export licenses for chemical and biological agents that can be used as weapons of mass destruction. Firms doing business with Saddam include AT&T, Bechtel, Caterpillar, Dow Chemical, Dupont, Kodak, Hewlett-Packard, IBM. (1994 report by Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs)
    • During Iran-Iraq war, “CIA regularly sent a team to Saddam to deliver battlefield intelligence...to aid...Iraq’s armed forces.” (UPI)
    • 1987-1988: “U.S. warships destroy Iranian oil platforms in Gulf and break Iranian blockade of Iraq shipping lanes.” (Palast)
    • 1988: “The CIA...provided military assistance to Saddam’s ferocious February...assault on Iranian positions...by blinding Iranian radar for three days.” (UPI)
    • “Nearly 15 years ago [was]...a period in which American presidents...treated him [Saddam] as a valuable ally.” (N. Y. Times editorial, 12/16)
    Without the U.S. butchers — every U.S. president from Kennedy to Reagan to Bush, Sr. — Saddam Hussein could never have been transformed into the mass murderer he became.
    For more info on Saddam/U.S. connection visit our website at www.plp.org

    Communist Wins Big Political Victory in D.C. Metro Vote

    WASHINGTON, D.C., Dec. 4 — In the shadow of the White House, in the midst of imperialist war and the fascist build-up of Homeland Security, PLP member Mike Golash received 1,200 votes for president of 4,100 cast in the 7,500-member Amalgamated Transportation Workers Union (ATU) Local 689. This may have been the most union votes for a real, OPEN communist in 50 years, in the heart of the capital of the imperialist world, in the face of heavy red-baiting.
    His campaign linked the economic crisis at home to the imperialist war in Iraq, and advanced the long-term communist objective of workers’ revolution against the entire system of bosses. The campaign encouraged workers to read and distribute CHALLENGE and get involved in the PLP’s revolutionary activities.
    The campaign’s main victory saw several workers become more involved with PLP, and a solid group of mainly black workers understand the severity of the crisis of capitalism and prepared to defend and give communist leadership. Mike received the votes of probably a thousand black workers in this 80% black local, showing that workers will reject nationalism when they see a revolutionary alternative that represents their class interests. In fact, it was the unity of black and white workers in the 1966 NYC transit strike that helped change PLP from a party supporting “progressive nationalism” to one opposing all nationalism as a bosses’ ideology.
    Mike has been a bus operator and union activist for 28 years. He served as shop steward and executive board member for many years and three years ago was elected Financial Secretary of 689, the Local’s #2 position. He organized a core of five other workers to conduct a campaign for the union presidency involving over 50 drivers, station attendants, cleaners and mechanics in the city’s Metro bus and rail system. They focused on the need to fight the bosses on several fronts: maintain health insurance and pension viability; reduce racist pay differentials between older and younger union members; and resist the increased harassment, contracting out and other management attacks.
    Mike won 28% of the vote, demonstrating mass confidence in militant, communist and anti-racist leadership that workers have come to know and trust over decades of struggle, day in and day out.
    Those Metro workers who do not yet fully appreciate the gravity of the current economic and political crises may find out soon. Many have been lulled by receiving a 4% raise while keeping their health insurance and pension benefits largely intact over the last three years. However, the coming contract negotiations threaten more serious consequences.
    Metro is already crying about operating deficits. The last contract cost Metro $40 million in increased labor costs; increased pension contributions over the next three years may exceed $100 million, with 12% increases in health costs as well. While some smoke-and-mirrors accounting tricks may reduce the pension liability, it will be virtually impossible for the union to improve, or even maintain the current contract without a major battle.
    These immediate economic concerns reflect endless imperialist war, worldwide economic crises, and intensifying fascist repression at home. They show that capitalism cannot meet the needs of our class and point to the inevitable failure of reform movements.
    Our coming task is to consolidate the key members of the campaign committee into a committed party organization that raises the consciousness of the workers through the circulation and discussion of CHALLENGE. This will lead more workers to understand the critical need to apply our revolutionary strategy to this spring’s contract negotiations, and provide a militant alternative to the sellout union leadership.
    We can bring a bold line to all Metro workers by recruiting a number of workers in this vital basic industry, increasing the circulation of CHALLENGE and building deeper ties with key workers. More could have been accomplished had the local Party organization taken a more aggressive and collective approach to the campaign, assisting the Metro workers. While we have weaknesses to overcome, the future is bright for the communist movement at Metro!

    Nationalism Another Bosses’ Tool
    Used vs. Workers

    The first article in CHALLENGE’s series on the general line of the PLP dealt with the need for a revolutionary communist party to lead the international working class in the historic struggle for the dictatorship of the proletariat. The next two exposed racist super-exploitation and racist ideology as key components of bosses’ state power. Now we turn to racism’s deadly twin, nationalism.
    Ideological and practical concessions to capitalism eventually killed the old communist movement, not superior economies or imperialist armies. Nationalism was a cancer lying at the root of all the right opportunist concessions that doomed the old movement.
    Like racism, nationalism was born with capitalism. This completely bourgeois concept offers nothing positive to workers and oppressed people. It has no place in a revolutionary communist movement. Smashing it will require a long and difficult uphill battle but is necessary and can be won.
    Nationalism means unity with the bosses. Capitalists, workers, farmers, students and intellectuals are urged to unite around the “national interest,” which usually means securing the bosses’ profits. In the U.S. today, workers are bombarded with the lie that “foreign workers are stealing our jobs,” like the nationalist “Stand Up for [U.S.] Steel” campaign pushed by the United Steel Workers union, or “Buy American.” These nationalist ideas pit workers of different nations against each other, which ultimately lead to more fascism and war. Nationalism ties workers to their exploiters and is the essence of the capitalist value system and the opposite of an internationalist working-class outlook.
    Take the U.S. After 9/11, Bush & Co. tried to drown us in an orgy of flag-waving nationalism. They invaded Afghanistan and then Iraq. But as CHALLENGE constantly shows, the rulers’ “national interest” in Iraq is the control of Persian Gulf oil, to use as a political and economic weapon to dominate the world for the foreseeable future.
    Hundreds of millions of people worldwide may see that the nationalism of U.S. rulers, the world’s biggest oppressors, is bad. However, many still cling to the illusion that the nationalism of oppressed people can be “progressive” and lead to liberation. History exposes this as a terrible mistake.

    Fight Racism and
    Nationalism

    Consider the fight against racism in the U.S. The old communist movement believed that nationalism had two aspects. The “bad” nationalists, for example, were racist fascists in the KKK and the bosses who backed them. The “good” nationalists supported carving out a “Black Nation” in five southern states, the so-called Black Belt.
    The Communist Party USA led the fight against racism and segregation, organized integrated unions and generally followed Marx’s dictum that white workers could never be free as long as black workers were in chains. At the same time, it was weak on nationalism, claimed to be the “real” U.S. patriots, and supported the “Black Belt Nation.” Had this republic ever been born, its class structure would have mirrored the boss-worker model of existing U.S. society.
    The old communist movement didn’t believe that workers could be won to fight for communism, so they had to settle for less. They viewed racism as “the Black question” rather than an attack on all workers. By embracing “good” nationalism, they fostered the illusion that black workers had something to gain by changing a white boss for a black one.
    The black republic never emerged, but the rulers found ways to exploit this opening the old movement had given them. In the 1950s, ’60s and ’70s, tremendous class battles rocked the U.S. — sit-ins for civil rights, strikes, ghetto rebellions and increasingly violent protests against U.S. imperialism’s Vietnam genocide. The militancy of black workers was the key and most dangerous from the bosses’ point of view.
    Nationalism rode to the rulers’ rescue. Workers’ anger and revolutionary aspirations were misled into demands for more black cops, black politicians, black corporate executives, and black voter registration. The CPUSA and other fake leftists in the mass movements sang “Amen.”

    How PLP Broke with All Forms of Nationalism

    In this period, our Party made a number of ideological breakthroughs, including that all forms of nationalism had to go. We attempted to sharpen the struggle against racism from a revolutionary communist perspective. We later concluded that socialism, in which we had believed until 1982, was another opportunist error, which inevitably reversed the titanic accomplishments of the Soviet and Chinese revolutions. We made many mistakes, but we fought hard for our new line and achieved some success.
    Every nationalist “demand” mentioned above has been achieved. All major U.S. police forces are now integrated. As PLP predicted at the time, black cops now have a blank check to terrorize and murder black, Hispanic, Asian and white workers and youth. Black politicians are mayors, governors, in Congress and hold cabinet posts. They helped the liberal Clinton implement “Workfare,” the most racist economic attack against workers in years. Giant corporations from Maytag to Time-Warner/AOL and American Express have had black CEOs in recent years. Colin Powell and Condi Rice serve as key lieutenants for Bush’s murderous foreign policy. Black people on the whole can vote almost anywhere in the U.S. (except Florida, where Bush’s brother Jeb helped the Republicans steal the 2000 presidential election by using the racist state police to prevent black workers from voting for Gore).
    With all these nationalist “reforms,” racist unemployment remains double for blacks what it is for whites, and the wage gap between black and white workers continues to grow. Over two million are in prison, about two-thirds of them young black and Latin men. Forty-five million Americans have no health insurance, public education is a farce and nearly 90% of U.S. workers have no union benefits. And Afghanistan and Iraq are just the opening shots in a series of wars the rulers are planning over coming decades. Black and Latin workers will suffer very high casualty rates in these imperialist adventures.

    Nationalism Helped Destroy Old Communist Movement

    In 1969, PLP published an article entitled “Revolutionaries Must Fight Nationalism.” At the time, we severely underestimated the consequences of the old Communist movement’s defeat. We have only recently come to see the magnitude of this historic setback. Lenin, Stalin, Mao and others achieved many heroic feats paving the road to communism. Yet none of them ever made the decisive break from nationalism.
    Socialism in the Soviet Union maintained the wage system. New Democracy, as Mao called it in China, promoted an alliance among workers, peasants, and the “progressive” section of Chinese bosses. The communist movement supported “workers’ control” of capitalist factories in the former Yugoslavia and any number of land reform schemes in Asia, Africa and Latin America.
    Nationalism contributed mightily to this defeat and still misleads billions in the U.S. and around the world. We shouldn’t wring our hands in despair any more than we should deny reality. Revolutionary communists must still fight nationalism. This fight will be long and very hard, but we can win.μ
    (In future articles: How nationalism destroys workers’ lives today from Baghdad to Beijing and how the world’s workers and communists must dig in to fight it over the long haul struggling against all forms of bourgeois ideologies, including the so-called “left-wing” nationalism.)

    Boeing’s New Jet A Trojan Horse To Screw Workers

    Workers have no horse to back in the battle over “corporate governance” being waged in the Boeing boardroom. But you can bet your bottom dollar the ruling class is disciplining its rogue elements as a prelude to coming after us. Boeing’s new CEO Harry Stonecipher and commercial chief Mulally are recommending Everett, Wash. as the site for Boeing’s new 7E7 assembly plant. But there are strings attached. According to the Seattle Times (12/7), “Worker support for a new production strategy is a key factor.”

    A Boss Is a Boss
    Is a Boss

    The press seemed surprised by Stonecipher’s commitment to the 7E7 commercial jet. He was supposed to be a ruthless cost cutter, interested only in war production, unlike the ousted and “more congenial” Phil Condit. “I’m [described as] more aggressive,” Stonecipher said. “I’ll shoot you and ask your name later. Phil will ask your name and then shoot you.”
    Having a viable commercial industry is vital to maintaining military aerospace supremacy. This year, for the first time, European Airbus will deliver more planes than Boeing, and could continue to dominate for years. Since January, Airbus orders represent $29.5 billion in revenues, more than double Boeing’s $13.5 billion. Airbus’ backlog of civil orders worth $142 billion handily beats Boeing’s $90 billion. Boeing, with only two competitive jet lines remaining, must launch the new plane if it wants to stay in the commercial business.
    Recommending the Everett assembly site “is linked to a broader transformation of Puget Sound production lines for at least two other planes, the 777 and the 767.” (Seattle Times, 12/7) The 767 line will soon end its commercial life and be used solely for Air Force aerial tankers. This “transformation” mirrors the strategy advocated by the Industrial College of the Armed Forces, a government agency charged with planning the wartime mobilization of U.S. industry.

    No Secret Negotiations, Just ‘Informal Discussions’

    This same article reports Boeing has been in secret “talks with [its] union for the past few months.” The company wants all workforce changes — including more “flexible” work rules and a “super-efficient, just-in-time parts supply system” (read: outsourcing) — in place by 2007. Stonecipher and Mulally are afraid that the union, let alone a furious rank-and-file, won’t buy into these changes if they locate the plant out of state. The 7E7 masks the company’s plan for transformation into what it calls a “global lean enterprise.”
    Boeing workers who questioned Machinist’s union District President Mark Blondin about these talks were told they were only “informal discussions.” The last “informal discussions” ended up with our union campaigning for taxpayer bribes to get the new assembly plant, including a $3.2 billion Boeing tax break for the new assembly plant, workers’ compensation curtailments and huge, racist cuts in unemployment insurance. Blondin’s call for a “new partnership” with Stonecipher didn’t do anything to calm our fears.

    Only Revolutionary Politics Will Do

    The unions, with their trade union politics of “don’t bite the hand that feeds you,” are not up to the task of defending our class in the face of “war transformation.” As we intensify our struggle within the union, we must keep our eye on the ball.
    Corporate scandals, war profiteering and workforce transformation to better suit the bosses’ imperialist ambitions are hitting home for many industrial workers. There’s a widespread feeling that something is fundamentally wrong, not only with our jobs, but with the whole society.
    “For the first time, I’m really afraid,” said a friend who’s not particularly close politically. “I just don’t see how we can survive as a society.” Workers can’t, if we allow capitalism to hold sway. Our most important job remains to expand our base of revolutionary-minded workers and the readership of our revolutionary communist press in the plants.
    Preparing for Constant War:
    ‘Coporate Governance’ = Disciplining the Ruling Class
    The U.S. ruling class can no longer afford to allow each company to go for the fast buck at the expense of imperialism’s long-range interests. This helps to explain the big shake-up in U.S. corporate leadership.
    In early December, 14 U.S. chief executives lost their jobs, says the Chicago outplacement firm Challenger Gray & Christmas. Thirty-nine percent of CEOs leaving their positions last year were fired or forced to retire, up from 25% in 2001, according to the consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton. This year’s number will be higher. The sudden changes at Delta Airlines, the top-level tussle at Disney over the future of CEO Michael Eisner and the forced retirement of Boeing CEO Phil Condit are three recent examples.
    Has U.S. capitalism suddenly developed a conscience regarding “corporate governance.” Do pigs fly? Although each case has its particular scandal, the general thrust is the ruling class’ need to discipline loose cannons. Conditions demand it.
    The laws of capitalism force each company to maximize its rate of return — grab the biggest profit possible. But maintaining U.S. imperialism’s worldwide dominance requires looking beyond an individual company’s bottom line. The Iraq war shows that the armed force necessary to control strategic Mid-East oil requires huge expenditures of economic and political capital. Meanwhile, competing imperialists are not standing still, requiring even more outlays. The current hoopla over “corporate governance” reflects this struggle between short and long-range interests — a contradiction permeating every pore of society.

    Boeing’s CEO Crashes;
    Pentagon Reined In

    The clash between short-term profits and U.S. imperialism’s strategic interests is particularly sharp among war producers. Boeing’s ouster of CEO Condit on December 1, on the heels of the Air Force tanker-lease scandal, is a particularly clear example. Former Hewlett-Packard CEO Lewis Platt will replace him as chairperson. Boeing’s Harry Stonecipher was brought out of retirement to fill in as CEO after first choice 3M CEO W. James McNerney, Jr. declined — for now.
    The tanker scandal also claimed the jobs of Boeing’s CFO Michael Sears and the head of the company’s missile program, Darleen Druyun. Ironically, Condit had fired them both the week before because Sears had offered Druyun a job while she was in charge of the tanker deal at the Pentagon.
    The failed tanker deal sealed Condit’s fate, even more than his womanizing and extravagant tastes. And the Pentagon couldn’t sign the deal because the foreign policy establishment, centered in the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR), disapproved. The Washington Post and the New York Times, two key mouthpieces of that establishment, killed the deal with constant exposés revealing every sordid detail of this shady deal. The Los Angeles Times called for “a bipartisan coalition in Congress to hold real hearings — with subpoena power — on how to re-institute accountability at the Pentagon.” Senator and CFR member John McCain (R-Ariz.) led the charge in Congress.
    Condit, under pressure from Europe’s Airbus and a general crisis of overproduction in aerospace, had opted for the fast buck with this “Enronesque” leasing deal. The CFR feared that the sight of greedy corporate pigs at the public trough would only further undermine support for the bosses’ already expensive imperialist plans. The Pentagon and their corporate partners had to be reined in.
    The Boeing board got the message. Boeing Board members Rozanne Ridgeway, Kenneth Duberstein and Senior Boeing V.P. Thomas R. Pickering are all CFR members. Duberstein and Pickering sit on its Board of Directors. The Boeing board commissioned another CFR director, former Sen. Warren Rudman, to investigate the tanker affair.
    The CFR, which mainly emerged after World War II with grants from the Carnegie, Ford and Rockefeller foundations, continues to guide U.S. imperialism in the interests of the country’s biggest bosses — Chase, Citigroup, ExxonMobil, etc. Platt and Stonecipher are connected to this group through interlocking directorates and ruling class foundations. Workers aren’t in this mix; it’s just about discipline amongst our enemies.
    “Oh, what a wicked web they weave,” said an inspector when presented with these facts. “We need a radical change in direction.” He’s not the only one beginning to question the assumptions of capitalism.

    Fight Militarization of Health Care At
    APHA Convention

    SAN FRANCISCO, CA. November 20 — About 10,000 delegates attended the American Public Health Association (APHA) annual meeting. They met against a backdrop of war, a growing crisis of healthcare cutbacks, 43 million uninsured, and attempts to re-tool public health into an arm of the military focused on bio-terrorism.
    The “liberal” APHA leadership wants to collaborate with U.S. imperialism, trading traditional public health work, like childhood immunizations, for military work, like smallpox vaccinations. In contrast, people cheered wildly when a South African AIDS activist said the greatest threat to world health was the Bush administration.
    PLP delegates sold CHALLENGE and distributed a leaflet opposing the imperialist war in Iraq, the fascist Homeland Security police-state, racist health cuts and exposed how electing Democrats is jumping from the frying pan into the fire. We participated in building a demonstration against the new Medicare prescription/privatization law, sponsored by local groups we work in, and were warmly received for distributing a leaflet protesting the appearance of Tommy Thompson, notorious for kicking millions off welfare as Wisconsin Governor.
    We helped pass a resolution opposing subordinating public health to Homeland Security, and we’re starting to push specific implementations, including actions at next year’s meeting in Washington, D.C. We are also becoming more active in APHA Sections.
    A core issue in APHA, as well as in groups representing patients, health workers and unions, is the demand for universal, single-payer healthcare. Our challenge is to expose how the liberal politicians’ healthcare “reforms” are mainly meant to serve U.S. imperialism.
    Insurance companies want a “universal” healthcare system of government vouchers and stripped-down benefits for the uninsured, which would later become the norm for employer-paid health benefits. Private employers want to shed the costs of workers’ healthcare, to cut wages and benefits and increase profits, allowing them to keep pace with their imperialist rivals worldwide.
    In this period of open-ended war and worldwide productive over-capacity, the capitalists will use their government to severely ration health care. They only want us healthy enough to work long hours for low pay, and to fight their wars.
    Our challenge in the fight for equal and quality healthcare is to expose the role of the ruling class, build a mass base for PLP and fight for political leadership of the masses.

    Teaching Anti-racism and Class Consciousness

    I use M&M candies with my high school students to show that racism is the cutting edge of the attack on all workers and that in discussing “race” we must discuss class, and vice versa.
    We start by quoting George Bush, Sr. who, like all U.S. Presidents, refused to collect class-based government statistics. “We will not,” he declared, “be divided by class!”
    Then I hand out cards. Green ones are marked “79%,” blue ones “73%” and red ones “38%.” The students sign each card and then put them in a bag. A drawing determines a winner for each color and each winner gets their percentage points of M&M’s.
    For the green card winner, I pull out a clear plastic bottle measuring 1 cup that is 79% full of M&M’s. It’s almost three handfuls. The blue one (with 73%) is only a shade smaller. But with the red ones, the class goes wild.
    It’s 38% full of M&M’s alright, but it’s a half-gallon-size bottle! There are more M&M’s in this bottle than the other two put together, leading to my first point: when comparing percentages, we always must ask, “a percentage of what — what quantity or volume?” If we don’t ask that question, we can get manipulated.
    Then I show a bar-graph from a textbook called “Teaching Economics as if People Mattered,” published by a pro-union group, United for a Fair Economy. The graph shows the “Percentage of Families whose savings would run out in three months or less” — 79% of African-American families find themselves living on the edge, 73% of Latinos and 38% of white families are in the same situation.
    I ask the students to reproduce the graph and answer questions about it. Which race has the most poverty-threatened families? Which has the fewest? How does this make you feel? Can you tell how many families are threatened? Can you think of a strategy to change the situation?
    Next I display a bar-graph using the same design as the union one. It shows, “Families whose savings would run out in three months or less.” It deals in actual numbers. There are 30 million white (38% of the total white family population), 9 million African-American (79% of the total black population), and 6.5 million Latino families (73% of total Latinos) living in or near poverty.
    Again I ask the students to reproduce the graph and answer the same questions. Almost always a few students have difficulty with this. It seems to contradict everything they’ve been told about “race” and poverty. It seems to contradict the first bar-graph.
    In fact, both graphs are accurate and both are needed to show the complete picture. Showing one without the other distorts the picture. Whites are encouraged to think that poverty is not a major issue for them, while black and Latino families wonder what hope there is in a situation so overwhelmingly an issue of “race.” Unwittingly, the liberal “Teaching Economics as if People Mattered” reproduces Bush’s dictum — “We will not be divided by class.”
    At this point, I can introduce the category of class in our analysis of racism and society. Other lessons build up a clearer picture of class but in this one I demonstrate how powerful we feel when we begin to see our size, and picture our potential unity.
    In fact, including the 4 million Asian, Pacific Ocean and Native American families living in or near poverty, the total becomes some 50 million families. That’s a massive chunk of humanity. And with size comes the possibility of power — a possibility that the liberal view hides by exclusively emphasizing the difference between blacks and whites. A class analysis showing the effects of racism on all workers at the same time, puts the size and potential strength of our class fair and square in front of our nose.

    California Grocery Strike: Class Struggle Sharpens Political Debate

    My church’s Peace and Justice Committee visited a nearby supermarket picket line. Several dozen of us brought refreshments for the 50 strikers and held a short rally. Contradictions soon emerged.
    The minister gave a mini-sermon about the strikers being the “salt of the earth.” He passed a microphone around for church people to tell why they had come. People said things like, “I support your struggle for health care,” and, “I want you to know that other people care.” Then someone said, “I’m here because when workers like you organize as a class, you’re the only ones with the power to bring peace and justice to the world.” Immediately the minister took the microphone back to say that “the real power is God.”
    That’s how liberal religious leaders sabotage class struggle while pretending to support it. Instead of strikers and supporters learning lessons about workers’ power, they are led to seek peace and reconciliation with the bosses in the name of “God.”
    Only a couple of us were discussing how the war economy relates to unionized workers’ struggle to retain health benefits. Our church group marched all last winter against the Iraq war, often with signs saying “Health Care Not Warfare.” Self-critically, I underestimated the depths of liberal opportunism, and assumed that the committee leaders would raise anti-war politics on a picket line.
    On the positive side, some of my church friends were joining workers for the first time. One guy brought his guitar to lead social-justice hymns. He responded to requests from Latino/a strikers and sang Spanish-language songs of struggle, including one with the chorus, “No basta rezar” (“Praying isn’t enough”). A woman from our group was inspired to start singing the Internationale. Very few people (strikers or church people) knew this communist anthem, but our guitarist now wants to learn it.
    Class struggle can truly be a school for communism. The liberal clergy are building support for “low-wage” workers (janitors, farmworkers, hotel employees). They didn’t support the transit mechanics strike because the workers “made too much”! Their goal of a so-called “living wage” is really supporting a subsistence wage, capitalism’s hallmark.
    The main goal of these clergy is to convince the most exploited to trust capitalism and liberal reform, and support this racist warmaking system. My pacifist minister didn’t utter a peep against the war at the picket line. We need to be active in this movement to advance the opposite ideas among people in our churches and to the workers we are mobilized to support.

    California Comrade

    Immigrants’ Anti-Racist March Challenges Nationalists’ ‘Patriotic’ Strategy

    LOS ANGELES, CA., Dec. 12 — About 500 workers from the garment, construction, and other industries joined with black, white and Latino high school and college students in a militant march in downtown LA, protesting racism and exploitation.
    They were answering the racism of California’s Democratic and Republican politicians’ revoking SB60, the law giving drivers’ licenses to undocumented workers. The march went further than the nationalist organizations’ call for a one-day “Latino boycott”, publicized by some Spanish-language TV and radio stations.
    The majority of immigrant rights organizations, unions, TV stations and churches opposed the work-stoppage/boycott, and especially a march. But thousands of workers didn’t go to work. Hundreds participated in the march, organized by garment workers. Many high school students also organized walkouts and marches at their schools. PLP participated in these activities, distributing thousands of leaflets and hundreds of CHALLENGES, linking racist attacks on all workers to the war in Iraq.
    Last week, thousands of workers confronted garment bosses, demanding the day off for the stoppage/boycott. They organized committees and lists of potential backers of the stoppage while bosses called shop meetings to block support for it. Some bosses threatened to fire those not coming to work. Some small garment shops closed for the day.
    As the day approached, dozens of workers, mostly women, took leaflets written by co-workers to their factories. Others requested leaflet distributions at their shops. Some workers boldly reproduced leaflets right inside their bosses’ offices. In the fever of class struggle, workers develop many forms of struggle.
    These days reflected the potential to create many new CHALLENGE networks to build a mass base with deep ties and communist ideas, and to convert these battles into sharper political confrontations between workers and bosses. This can produce the strength that will eventually eliminate the bosses and their fascist system. Although many of the factory fights were for immediate reforms, they also reflected hatred of exploitation and racism in general. The struggle within the Party was sharpened, aimed at advancing our communist ideas amid the mass push for these reforms.
    Meanwhile, the bosses are debating what to do about the country’s 7 to 11 million undocumented workers. One section — which profits directly from this exploitation and don’t have interests abroad — wants to keep undocumented immigrants legally marginalized, super-exploited and deportable. Other bosses, state-wide and nationally, advocate a long-range policy legalizing the majority. This section is concerned with maintaining the entire U.S. imperialist system, not just with immediate profits. These liberal bosses are the most dangerous because they pose as “friends and defenders” of the workers. They’re also racist super-exploiters, but with a twist.
    Since 9/11, U.S. rulers are conducting permanent war. For them a stable, passive and loyal workforce is crucial. Immigrants are vital to many industries in California and elsewhere.
    Permanent war also means maintaining an enormous military force worldwide. U.S. bosses see the 11 million undocumented workers, plus their millions of children and legalized relatives, as a huge source of military recruitment and exploitation. They need these workers and their children to defend imperialism, such as the current war to control Iraq’s oil.
    To achieve these goals, the bosses use their politicians like Gil Cedillo and the other Democrats, as well as organizations like Hermandad Mexicana Nacional and broadcast announcers, to pressure the politicians for small changes helping the exploited masses, but “within the limits of the system.” For example, Cedillo and the Democrats agreed with Schwarzenegger to vote against SB60 if he would accept a new law granting licenses to immigrants with certain Republican changes (full police background checks). Passage of such legislation is probable.
    The bosses’ plans mean destruction and death for millions of our class worldwide. But last week’s activities demonstrate great potential to change this. Our unity, organization and determination are indispensable to organizing a communist revolution that will destroy this murderous, racist system with its exploitation and wars. Our fight is for a new communist world without racism, borders, passports, money and a privileged few bosses, one that produces to meet the needs of our working class.

    Workers Fight Layoffs, Take Over Baltimore School Board

    BALTIMORE, Dec. 10 — “Lay off the Board! Lay off the Board!” chanted clapping, stomping protestors as they took over the nine seats reserved for Baltimore City School Board members and filled the large room where the Board had scheduled its public meeting. Facing 700 announced layoffs — and more to come —hundreds of angry teachers, other school workers, students and community activists were blocked by aggressive police from entering the supposedly “public” session. Cops violently grabbed some of those already inside, shoving them out of the building. Many protestors picketed and chanted outside, banging on the Board room windows.
    Board members were prevented for an hour from starting their public hearing. Protest sponsors included the Baltimore Teachers Union, AFSCME Local 44 (custodians and cafeteria workers), the City Union of Baltimore (secretaries) and the community-based organization ACORN.
    The layoffs are being blamed on “mismanagement, ” causing a $70 million “deficit.” But under capitalism, the bosses control every aspect of society, including education. The entire genocidal decline of the city’s school system, now overwhelmingly black, was planned by Baltimore’s ruling class. The City Schools CEO is Bonnie Copeland, formerly the education director for the Greater Baltimore Committee (GBC), composed of the area’s 100 largest businesses, the elite of finance and industry. The other powerful force is Johns Hopkins, the local health industry giant and Baltimore’s largest employer. CEO Copeland hired an outside financial “expert” from Hopkins, Robert Neall, who was given leave by Hopkins to come in and orchestrate the layoffs.
    School employees are angry that it’s our heads rolling, not those of Board members and officials who mismanaged school system funds, causing the deficit. But the ruling class itself is responsible for this, not merely these officials, the same way they were responsible years back for gutting our retirement system.
    That earlier cutback can be traced to a think tank — the Metropolitan Center for Planning and Research — jointly sponsored by the GBC and Johns Hopkins.The Metro Center Task Force at that time “recommended” three goals for Maryland: (1) lowering wages; (2) lowering pollution standards for industry; and (3) lowering the state’s budget for public services.
    The bosses then backed Democrat Harry Hughes for Governor who pledged to implement these “proposals.” Hughes was elected and his first act was to slash teachers’ pensions. The bosses say jump; their politicians ask how high?.
    The educational genocide in Baltimore’s schools began over 30 years ago, and fits neatly into the bosses’ need for a large pool of semi-skilled and unskilled workers competing for low-wage jobs. In 1968, the majority of the city’s students were white. Its schools were the fourth highest of Maryland’s 24 districts in money per student. Following the assassination of Martin Luther King and ensuing rebellions that year, Baltimore’s real estate moguls scared white families into selling their homes at rock-bottom prices and leaving town.
    By 1974 the majority of students were African American and the city was now fourth from the bottom in per-pupil spending for education. This racism hurt the 10% remaining white students as well — the highest dropout rates have been in poor white neighborhoods. Overall, 9th-graders in the zone schools in recent years have had average reading skills at the 5th-grade level, meaning half the students read below that!
    This, of course, supplies Baltimore’s bosses with workers for the 65% of area jobs that are unskilled. Their plan is working. They’re ensuring today’s class structure for the next generation. The rulers’ schools help control the working class, especially African American families through this institutional racism.
    Similar plans exist in other major cities, St. Louis for one, where a private educational company has been given the school system, to run it for the bosses.
    Maryland’s Thornton Commission has said that Baltimore City schools need $250 million more annually to begin helping students achieve on state tests a level equivalent to those in richer counties. Just four years of such racist short-changing adds up to robbery of a billion dollars. Despite legislation and court orders to add $2,600 per student, little has happened.
    Meanwhile, these racist layoffs ravage the lives of school workers as well. At a “job fair” for the laid-off workers, “not many positions are available for longtime educators who have dedicated much of their lives to the Baltimore public schools.” (Baltimore Sun, 12/10) This is capitalism’s “reward” for lifetime service.
    The previous school CEO, Carmen Russo, said that last year she had wanted to eliminate many more people than she actually did, but stopped — after laying off about 300 low-paid custodians — because of widespread outrage.
    Although we must keep fighting, reform struggle cannot solve our problems. We must turn such struggles into schools for communsm Then we can understand that a system which spends tens of billions on imperialist wars and ravages our children’s education must be destroyed and replaced by a society that meets the needs of workers and their families — communism.
    Capitalist elections, lobbying and reform struggles won’t cut it. They can’t remove the Greater Baltimore Committee and Hopkins from power. Out of the continuing fight against today’s layoffs, we must join and build the Progressive Labor Party.

    Will Bring Anti-Imperialist Stand to MLA Convention

    The Modern Language Association — the professional organization of college and university-level teachers and scholars of literature and writing — will hold its annual convention from December 27 to 30 in San Diego. This year the MLA confronts various crises stemming from the war-mongering capitalist class’s increasing attacks on the working class in the sphere of higher education. The Radical Caucus (RC) in the MLA aims to provide leadership to anti-racist, internationalist and left-leaning academics who want to oppose the rulers’ drive to make universities centers of reaction, elitism and support for U.S. imperialism.
    The RC will raise four resolutions and one motion before the Delegate Assembly:
    • One addresses the government’s jingoistic use of “war talk” — especially the term “terrorism” — to rationalize its attacks on any people or nation whom it wishes to portray as “enemies.”
    •Another calls for the repeal of the Patriot Act, which enables the government to harass and spy on teachers and students, particularly those of foreign birth, dark skin and/or Islamic faith, as well as those who protest repressive and militaristic government policies.
    •A third links massive cutbacks in funding for public higher education with the $87 billion (and counting) war budget — and immense tax cuts for the wealthy — recently passed by Congress. It also calls for immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Iraq.
    •An emergency resolution opposing Congressional efforts to create an International Education Advisory Board that would oversee Area Studies — especially Middle East Studies — to guarantee that curriculum conforms to Homeland Security needs and to guarantee a steady conduit for Foreign Service and CIA cadre from U.S. colleges and universities
    A motion calls for the MLA to play an advocacy role on behalf of super-exploited teaching assistants and adjuncts, who teach nearly 60% of all college-level literature and writing classes, often at sub-minimum-wage levels, without benefits.
    Over the past decade the RC has provided strategies for progressive academics in the MLA — and a home base of kindred spirits — for leftist activism. Within the last year the RC has also played a leading role in organizing the new Alliance of Radical Academic and Intellectual Organizations (Radical Alliance, for short), which seeks to coordinate the activities of anti-capitalist academic caucuses — and the resources of various leftist academic journals — so that unified initiatives can be taken against the current racist, repressive and imperialist U.S. policies, domestic and international.
    A communist analysis of both world politics and the role played by institutions of higher education is essential to the successful work of both the MLA Radical Caucus and the Radical Alliance. While left-inclined academics are receptive to a broadly anti-capitalist view of current trends, many conceive of “the university” as a place beyond politics. The current critique of the “corporatization” of higher education is often based on denying the role colleges and universities have always performed on behalf of the capitalist class that rules society. There is no “golden age.”
    Moreover, the “left” ideas that shape the activism of many anti-capitalist academics incorporate, without criticism, the old communist movement’s outlook that socialism, and then communism, could be attained only by moving through a series of necessary “stages.” This views reformist activities, such as participating in electoral politics, as being vital to developing a revolutionary movement.
    Finally, it is communists who stress the central role of racism in current U.S. ruling-class actions, including the vicious cutbacks in access to public higher education and the prosecution of foreign policy. The fight against racism, both domestically and internationally, is crucial to a communist strategy for organizing among progressive academics in the coming period. (A report on the results of the convention itself will be forthcoming.)

    Who are the Main Murderers?

    The discovery of three bodies of teenage boys in the basement of an apartment in a supposedly “run-down” part of Hammond, Indiana has shocked Northwest Indiana and the nation. The first response of many people is to rely on pro-capitalist explanations of this tragedy, rather than looking deeper into both this situation and other mass killings in our society. Because this case is so sensational and “in your face”, and because so many people get their understanding of society from television cop shows, movies, and fear-mongering in the news media, many people focus on the killer. Is he “evil” or “sick” or a combination of both? But if we want to stop the killings of innocent people, we have to look deeper into just what is happening in our society.
    A major aspect of racist, anti-working class actions by the cops is how they harass, brutalize, and sometimes kill innocent people. Another aspect is how they often do not do the kind of work to actually protect working class people from killings like this, although television would have us believe that the cops are great protectors of the working class. The alleged killer was convicted of killing one child in 1974 while he was in the Army in Germany, and served over ten years in jail for killing a second teenager in Chicago in the 1980’s. He was a suspect in another teenage murder. He also was out on bail for drinking with a couple of teenagers a few months ago, including one of the teenagers found murdered. A friend of one of the victims even told the police that there was something strange about the relationship between the accused killer and one of the victims.
    The first teenager disappeared from that neighborhood last spring. The other two were killed several months later. In a society where the police and the FBI are spending hundreds of millions of dollars spying on anti-war activists and arresting Muslims, they were unable to put the pieces together. Can you imagine what would have happened if the first two people he had killed were cops----or even the children of rich people! Not that we want the government to keep more files on everyone, of course. They will just use those files against communists and other pro-working class activists. But it is important to understand that the cops really DON’T provide protection for working class people from most crimes! That is like believing that Bush invaded Iraqi to “protect the Iraqi people” instead of the real reason: to control the huge Iraqi oil reserves (see editorial in this issue of Challenge). That’s point one.
    Point two is that the alleged killer was an abuser of drugs and alcohol, and his own mind was twisted by the psychological stresses of capitalist-created family problems. Capitalism stresses children and parents and their parents. It does this through economic stress and through a culture that says that people can be used and abused like toys. Some people take this further and become major abusers and even killers. And the lack of serious treatment for so many people with mental disorders creates a situation where they are either in jail or back on the streets, with no support system to help overcome their disorders. The increased pro-war spending will mean further cutbacks in these kinds of social services.
    But there is another, more fundamental point to all this. Capitalism also kills many millions more in polite, legal ways. For example, the youth were killed just a short distance from three major steel mills, the execution chamber for dozens of steelworkers killed, and thousands more who died early from diseases, as a result of capitalism’s drive for profits and carelessness with workers’ lives. It is near a power plant, which drops poisonous mercury and cancerous smoke throughout that area, and near the oil refinery as well as numerous toxic dumps which have given cancer to thousands more over the years. And that’s just in Northwest Indiana—we could write more about the tens of millions that capitalism, and the respectable businessmen who live in nice neighborhoods, kill all over the world. They are the biggest “serial killers”!
    Our schools, news media, and entertainment media exist to cloud the picture, to make us fear other working class people and to ignore the real causes of our oppression. A Marxist analysis, a communist analysis understands how anti-working class exploitation and oppression lie at the roots of our problems, and communists organize to build working class unity against all forms of capitalist oppression, from the obvious exploitation on the job, to the more hidden ways that they create the conditions for other crimes against the working class. Challenge-Desafio is an important tool to help combat the lies of the capitalist media. Help distribute bundles of Challenge-Desafio to family, friends, and co-workers! Help destroy the lies and the racist, anti-working class system of death which is capitalism!

    Communist Leadership Crucial to Mass Movements

    Recently over 200 workers, youth and professionals participated in a Peace and Justice symposium in our city. It’s theme was “War, Resources and Empire in the 21st Century.” PLP members and friends helped organize and lead the symposium.
    Why is communist leadership important in these events. Communists highlight the difference between capitalist and communist ideas and welcome debate. We make as objective an analysis as possible about what people think based on our shared personal and political ties with them. We stimulate and lead “actions” while emphasizing that the roots of the class struggle lie in the capitalist system itself. We organize for communist revolution within the mass organizations and the mass movement, measuring our success by the growing number of CHALLENGE readers and the growing number of new PLP members who can in turn give leadership. The quality of our leadership depends on the depth of our political consciousness, how well we understand complexity in situations, long-term practice and experience and our ability to be self-critical.
    “To change the world we must understand it, not just in its appearance but also in its essence,” said a comrade at the opening sessions. Throughout the event, many ideas and questions were expressed and debated. Are we simply seeking a better or more humane U.S. “foreign policy” or are the roots of the war in Iraq in the imperialist system itself? Understanding empire and conquest in a general sense not the same as understanding what is modern imperialism. It isn’t just an evil empire that causes endless wars, but inter-imperialist rivalry on a global scale.
    Most oppose global exploitation of the working class and the widening gap between the super-rich and the poor. But what’s the solution? Do we accept lessening the “inevitable gap” and leading personal lives of “sacrifice and service” while leaving the capitalist system intact? Or do we organize for revolution and prepare for workers’ power and the construction of communist society? Can “withdrawing consent” and “practicing active non-violence” end the violence of capitalism against the working class, oppressed people, women, children and the elderly?
    Many campaign for resolutions calling on city governments to refuse to “enforce” the Patriot Act and defend the “Bill of Rights.” Communists participate in these campaigns, and in struggles against attacks on immigrants. But from history we also learn the main features of fascism and how it was violently defeated, mainly by the Red Army and millions of workers who gave their lives in the Soviet Union.
    “Is the U.S. the 4th Reich?” asked a comrade in his talk. Communists point out that nationalism, national liberation and self-determination failed to free the working class from poverty, war and racist repression, whether in Africa, South America or anywhere else.
    Some aspects of communist ideas were raised in the main session, in workshops, in conversations between friends or one on one, depending on the circumstances.
    Communists can never give in to liberalism blind hope based on illusion. “We must learn well from history that this leaves us open to manipulation and ultimately to fascist demagoguery,” said a comrade in her session.
    Communist seek to really know the masses. In organizing for the symposium we listened to many rank-and-file people in community groups and churches, who last year thought the war in Iraq could be justified. Now they’re appalled as events unfold. They read letters from loved ones in the U.S. military in Iraq in which soldiers questioned the “morality” and “reasons” for their mission. As we get to know people more deeply, we learn to rely on their thinking and efforts. Our personal ties cement friendship even as we have intense political disagreements.
    The symposium endorsed several “actions”: participation in a protest to close down the School of the Americas (which trains Latin American death squads), a Martin Luther King Day protest to demand: “Jobs, yes. Occupations, no; Racist repression has got to go”; a protest at the local Senator’s office against the 24-hours-work-for-12-hours-pay slave labor of home attendants, mostly women immigrants; and an April action to commemorate the Warsaw Ghetto Rebellion. Communist leadership will prove vital in motivating more people to come into the street, to overcome fears and passivity and to give vigorous leadership at these protests.
    As PLP members continue to work in the grassroots coalition we must be self-critical. It is imperative that we develop and rely on youth leadership, fight negativity in ourselves and rely more on our friends. We cannot accept a lack of growth in CHALLENGE readership and the Party’s base because we’re timid or lack plans. Over 300,000 workers and youth poured into London’s streets to protest Bush’s visit there, thousands of workers too part in insurrection in Bolivia, millions in Italy struck against pension “reform” and thousands marched against globalization in Miami. Clearly we can see an outcry against capitalist war, inequality, poverty and racism. With all its ups and downs the revolutionary process is in motion. Let’s seize this moment in history.

    PLP Leaflet in Italy Attacks
    Government-Boss Gang-up

    [In the first weekend of December, over one million workers in Italy protested the right-wing Berlusconi government’s plan to raise workers’ retirement age. This is the same government that sent troops to help the U.S. occupation of Iraq. The following are translated excerpts of a leaflet distributed by PLP friends in Italy.]
    **************************************

    Against the Attack by the Government and Bosses’ Federation

    The Berlusconi government is sharply attacking our working conditions and standard of living, in the name of competitiveness and balancing the country’s budget, to guarantee corporate profits.
    Over the past 25 years, in the name of competitiveness we have seen: cancellation of automatic cost-of-living increases; increased workloads and speed-up; an explosion in contracting and subcontracting work (thanks to the “center-left” governments); and reduced job security. We’re told it’s “necessary to accept sacrifices” to compete with U.S. and German products. But we’ve seen workers in other countries subjected to the same prescription and same excuse.
    To save one’s own standard of living by leaving matters to the competitiveness of the company or the “national system,” means throwing ourselves into an endless whirlpool of reductions, along with other workers here and worldwide. Capitalists need workers, but want them at the lowest cost in order to exploit them even more. The attack on pensions, schools, health, the national contract, the rights of immigrant workers, and on Article 18 (defining firing for just cause) are all part of the capitalists’ offensive against workers of all colors and nations.
    With the abolition of Article 18, the bosses are demanding the freedom to fire, making us all less secure. This blackmail reduces our ability to organize and struggle, to defend and improve our conditions. The Confederation of Industrial Bosses wants a more pliant, non-union workforce, without collective organization and therefore is constantly trying to eliminate state control of the workplace [Current laws protect most European workers from being fired at will by private employers.
    The “left” government of Schroeder [Germany] wants to raise the retirement age and the governments of France and Switzerland are making similar plans. Even the “left” government of Lula in Brazil, dictated by the International Monetary Fund, is ready to enact pension “reform” against the workers’ interest, despite the fact that it was the working class of Brazil that put Lula into power.

    Increasing Military Spending To Control Oil

    There’s no difference between “left” and “center-right” governments in wanting to make workers pay for military re-armament and future wars. The first meeting to construct a Europe-wide imperialist army occurred under the D’Alema government (Democratic-Socialist Party), between D’Alema (then President of the European Council) and Tony Blair in London. The political economy of the Berlusconi government — and of the European states and the USA — creates war that all workers will pay for, both in economic terms and in blood.
    We must direct the anger of the working class against the ruling class, instead of allowing it to be diverted into the dead-end of voting for the parties and governments of the “center-left,” as occurred in 1994 when the general strikes led to the fall of the then Berlusconi government. When L. Dini [author of the pension reform law] switched from Berlusconi’s government to the “center-left,” he then launched a milder pension reform , backed by the unions and the Democratic-Socialist Party. This was the main reason workers struck.
    We must rebuild a revolutionary communist party for our class, a Communist International as the alternative to the capitalist future of barbarism, war, lack of job security and poverty. Fight for Communism!
    Progressive Labor Party (Italy)

    Colombia’s Oil Workers Fight Boss / Union Traitor Privatizing Plan

    Colombia’s oil workers are locked in a life-and-death struggle for their jobs with ECOPETROL, the state-owned oil company, while fighting their traitorous union leaders.
    A year ago, a mass meeting of ECOPETROL workers adopted a resolution rejecting the bosses’ demands that would lead to privatizing the company and force workers into arbitration. They also demanded the rehiring of fired workers and were ready to fight on these issues. But last August, the new union leadership argued for “flexibility” in negotiations with the bosses and the government, and disavowed the position taken at last year’s mass meeting. The hacks spread a lot of illusions about the bosses; after all, Colombia is in the center of the growing trend of war, inter-imperialist rivalry and fascism spawned by world capitalism.
    But the company’s idea of “flexibility,” is using contractors, downsizing and ending job security for all workers. They are also attacking the pension plan, demanding workers pay for their health insurance and refusing to re-hire fired workers. The anti-worker Arbitration Board is expected to rule against the workers, and for the first time, the USO (the ECOPETROL workers’ union) has agreed to accept its decision.
    While this sellout has paralyzed the usually militant USO membership, the company is speeding up the privatization process. Army patrols are flooding the company’s installations, harassing and threatening workers. Some rank-and-file workers are seeking the solidarity of other workers and students, but the treachery of the union leadership has made it very difficult.
    The ECOPETROL workers’ struggle reflects what workers face throughout Colombia and worldwide. President Uribe’s fascist government, fully backed by the Bush administration, is forcing workers to pay for the crisis of capitalism. The union hacks are handcuffing the workers, who lack a revolutionary leadership capable of confronting these attacks.
    But this is a temporary situation. Every dark night has its end. Angry workers will eventually finish off this capitalist nightmare as revolutionary communists in PLP give bold leadership, step up our political work and our distribution of CHALLENGE-DESAFIO as an ideological weapon of the workers.

    LETTERS

    Joblessness a Mass Killer

    In early December, Chilean papers reported the Pope had denounced communism for mass murder during the 20th Century. He again repeats the anti-communist Big Lie, as perfected by Hitler’s Propaganda czar, Goebbels — the bigger the lie, the more people will swallow it. This particular lie is used to cover the crimes of history’s biggest mass murderer: capitalism.
    Capitalism kills in many ways. Here in Chile, 10% of the labor force is relatively well-paid, earning an average of several thousands dollars a month, but 60% of the labor force earns less than 350,000 pesos ($500) a month. The official unemployment rate reported by President Lagos’ “Socialist” government is 8.6%. If the average minimum wage of 105,000 pesos a month was paid to the unemployed by taking it from the well-off 10%, it still wouldn’t solve the unemployment problem because even the minimum wage is nearly like being jobless. One can barely survive, much less improve one’s life. But unemployment can never be solved under capitalism because it’s intrinsic to the system.
    How does this relate to mass murder? Capitalism kills workers fast and slow. Being poor kills us slowly. The bosses exploit workers till they drop dead because of lack of decent health care, poor nutrition, inadeaquate wages, stress, injuries on the job, etc. They kill us on the altar of maximum profits, for a few bosses and their lackeys.
    Another capitalist killer is fascism. Chile had one of the most murderous fascist regimes in recent history. Under Pinochet — blessed by the Vatican and Nixon/Henry Kissinger — thousands were jailed, tortured and murdered. And the Catholic Church is one of the biggest mass murderer of all — the Crusades, Inquisition, slavery and genocide against African and Native Americans, etc.
    The best thing the Pope could do would be to shut up — or, better yet, leave the world of the living already.
    A Comrade in Chile

    Use CHALLENGE to ‘Connect the Dots’

    Rereading the letter “Looking Forward to Challenge” (12/17), I see differences between today and the Watergate era when, as you said, people seemed to be more “eagerly awaiting the next issue.” Similarly, visions of “soldiers grabbing Iskra . . .craving communist analyses of the war” do not appear today. Instead we see: (1) qualitative demise of the international communist movement; (2) resulting cynicism that penetrates our own ranks; and, (3) equally important, subtle but deliberate anti-communist news. Even internet “exposés” are written in such a way as to keep our friends AND US passive, frightened and blind to the dialectics of history.
    CHALLENGE has noted the confusion spread by Russia (before 1989) and China calling themselves communist (after they had long abandoned it). The daily papers emphasize the effect of the trade deficit between “us” and China and the blocking of Russia’s share of Iraqi “reconstruction” profits. Every day people hear that “communism equals imperialism.”
    Our own cynicism is not immune to this international scene. In addition, our involvement in larger, sellout-led organizations can sap our confidence to advance the idea of a corruption-free society. We have the backbreaking job of dispelling the illusion that unions are the answer WHILE simultaneously fighting side by side with our co-workers for pennies.
    Challenge can be the lever that helps us.For example, the Wal-Mart article (12/17, p. 3) exposes the New York Times’ advocacy of workers hovering around the poverty line rather than below it. This can provoke much discussion about unions, the liberal news media and capitalism generally. We do our homework and pore through every issue, noting those articles that connect the dots, and check those headlines that might interest specific friends. Frequently, even if people read no further, they will pay attention to the feature you’ve taken the trouble to pinpoint for them.
    In discussing this letter with two new comrades, they said the Wal-Mart article and the “facts” box contrasting the Medicare drug rip-off and health care under communism were helpful. They felt it was important to be specific as often as possible about differences between life under capitalism and communism. However, they said the culture articles on that issue’s back page presumed the reader was already a communist, and that kind of assumption wasn’t useful.
    They said they wanted to participate in a future discussion of how the paper is written. Meanwhile, we agreed to discuss several articles in every issue, even reading CHALLENGE on-line if we don’t have an actual copy. The world may be smaller today, and the international working class more than ever is demonstrating in the streets, but the pervasive bombs of the media pound our class every moment, making our job more complex, and our presenting of CHALLENGE must therefore become more attentive.
    Red Nurse

    ‘Over’ vs ‘More’ Consumption

    In the “Over-consumption vs. More Consumption?” letter to CHALLENGE (12/17), I think the comrade fails to see it is not the use of bourgeois sources that is being criticized but the idealistic portrayal of environmental tactics, “greater efficiency and less waste” as a reason why “consumption levels will increase for all workers.” Communism will vastly increase individual consumption for workers worldwide, primarily because we will work collectively to build a society where sharing is based on need and everyone will share society’s benefits and burdens.
    The comrade correctly says the transition from feudalism to capitalism decreased the amount of labor in products but fails to note that the majority of workers worldwide could not afford them. Environmental concerns, though important in a planned communist society, will have to take a back seat to the life-and-death concerns of the majority of the working class, as clearly explained in the original criticism (CHALLENGE, 11/19).
    Avid Reader

    $1 More Won’t Put Dent in Poverty

    On Dec. 8, a demonstration by the “$5.15 Is Not Enough Coalition” demanded the New York State Legislature and Governor Pataki increase the NY State minimum wage to $6.75/hr. Half a million workers state-wide could benefit, including 10% of NYC’s workforce. Cheng-Wha Hong of the NY Immigration Coalition said: “70% of immigrant families have very low incomes. A higher minimum wage is essential to get immigrant families out of poverty.”
    The demonstrators argued against the bosses’ lie that a higher minimum wage will eliminate jobs. They accused Pataki and Republican Joseph Bruno, head of the State Senate, of blocking legislation for a higher minimum wage.
    Workers deserve as much as we can take from the bosses, but a dollar increase in the minimum wage wouldn’t put a dent in poverty. A family of four needs at least $15-$20 an hour to stay just above the poverty line. Neither Democrats nor Republicans will grant workers that demand, since both parties serve the bosses.
    No amount of higher minimum wages will end poverty and racist exploitation. Several decades ago the minimum wage was half what it is now, but there are more workers in poverty today than before, particularly black and immigrant workers. Capitalism is based on reaping profits from the workers’ labor. If bosses are forced to pay higher wages, they must increase their profits by other means: layoffs and speed-up, higher taxes and higher prices, etc. That’s why we fight for communism, to abolish wage slavery, bosses and wages, where production serves the needs of the working class.
    ‘Any Wage Is Not Enough’

    RED EYE ON THE NEWS

    BELOW ARE EXCERPTS FROM MAINSTREAM NEWSPAPERS THAT CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION:Abbreviations: NYT=New York Times, GW=Guardian Weekly (UK)

    Israel trains US vs. Iraq

    Israeli advisors are helping train American special forces in aggressive counter-insurgency operations in Iraq, including the use of assassination squads....A former senior US intelligence official ...added that he feared the new tactics would inflame a volatile situation in the Middle East....We’re already being compared to Sharon in the Arab world, and we’ve just confirmed it by bringing in the Israelis and setting up assassination teams. (GW, 12/17)

    Scratch a liberal, find Bush

    Dr. Dean’s candidacy has been defined by his opposition to the war in Iraq, the position that most energizes his supporters. But more quietly, he is formulating a worldview that has surprising intersections with Mr. Bush’s. The critical difference...is often-times one of style more than substance.
    “It’s all about nuance,” he said. (NYT, 12/14)

    Wal-Mart exploits Mexicans

    MEXICO CITY, Dec. 5 — The company that ate America is now swallowing Mexico.
    Wal-Mart, the biggest corporation in the United States, is already the biggest private employer in Mexico, with 110,164 workers on its payroll....
    Wal-Mart’s power is changing Mexico...with the same formula: cut prices relentlessly, pump up productivity, pay low wages, ban unions....
    In Mexico, for a newly-hired Wal-Mart cashier, the pay stub read about $1.50 an hour. (NYT, 12/6)

    Need medicine? Bring money!

    Medicare beneficiaries will not be allowed to buy insurance to cover their share of prescription drug costs under the new Medicare bill....
    Congress...wanted to be sure that beneficiaries would bear some of the cost. (NYT, 12/7)
    Can’t defend terror charge
    A team of military lawyers recruited to defend alleged terrorists held by the US at Guantanamo Bay was dismissed by the Pentagon after some of its members rebelled against the unfair way the trials have been designed....
    “The first day, when they were being briefed on the dos and don’ts, at least a couple said: ‘You can’t impose these restrictions on us because we can’t properly represent our clients.’
    “When the group decided they weren’t going to go along, they were relieved. They reported in the morning and got fired that afternoon.” (GW, 12/17)

    Bosses muddy the Red label

    Twelve years after the collapse of the Soviet one-party state, big business has become by far the most influential force in Russia’s elections....
    Leonid S. Mayevsky, a Communist member of the current Parliament, publicly criticized the party at a news conference last month, saying that 28 percent of its candidates were millionaires.
    “Is this the party of the people or of the millionaires?” he asked.
    He was promptly expelled from the party. (NYT, 12/2)

    An empire has no morality

    The White House is not a branch of Amnesty International....When it is better served by supporting dictatorships like Uzbekistan’s, expansionist governments like Ariel Sharon’s and organizations that torture and murder, like those in Colombia, it will do so.
    It funded Saddam when it needed to; it knocked him down when it needed to. In neither case did it act because it cared about the people of his country....
    All empires work according to the rules of practical advantage, rather than those of kindness and moral decency. (GW, 12/10)
    Information
    Print

    CHALLENGE, December 17, 2003

    Information
    17 December 2003 474 hits

    Medicare Ripoff Is Windfall For Drug And Insurance Bosses

    • The Fine Print: How the Drug Benefit Works
    • A Communist Alternative Plan

    a href="#Liberal Rulers’ Reform Plan: Education For War">"iberal Rulers’ Reform Plan: Education For War

    a href="#‘The Story Behind the Story’">‘T"e Story Behind the Story’

    Mexico: Angry Workers Must Fight All Bosses

    a href="#Grocery Strike: It’s Not Just Wal-Mart — It’s Capitalism!">Groc"ry Strike: It’s Not Just Wal-Mart — It’s Capitalism!

    Free Trade Meeting Flops; Cops Riot

    a href="#Cincinnati’s Killer Kops Kill Again">"incinnati’s Killer Kops Kill Again

    a href="#Hawk Hillary Criticizes ‘Bushites’: Not Enough Troops">Ha"k Hillary Criticizes ‘Bushites’: Not Enough Troops

    New Communist International Movement Must Bury Dark Ages

    • Emerging from the Dark Ages

    a href="#California Fire Destruction One More Cost of Bosses’ War">"alifornia Fire Destruction One More Cost of Bosses’ War

    Chicago Dinner Marks CHALLENGE Role in Building PLP

    Reform over Revolution Alive and Well in the Matrix Trilogy

    LETTERS

    a href="#‘Nickled and Dimed’ Bets on Legislation, Not Workers’ Power">‘Nic"led and Dimed’ Bets on Legislation, Not Workers’ Power

    Fare Hike, Pay Cut Gives CEO Bonus

    a href="#‘Over-consumption’ vs. ‘More Consumption’?">‘Over-"onsumption’ vs. ‘More Consumption’?

    Interfaith Meeting Discusses War, Racism

    Winning $upport For CHALLENGE

    • CHALLENGE COMMENT

    Look Forward to CHALLENGE

    Communist Ideas Answer Fascism

    a href="#Church Group Hears Need To Win GI’s">"hurch Group Hears Need To Win GI’s

    Red Eye On The News


    Medicare Ripoff Is Windfall For Drug And Insurance Bosses

    The battle over Medicare reflects an age-old conflict in capitalism. Individual companies seek short-term profits higher than their rivals’. International competition, however, drives the ruling classes of different nations to fight for long-term survival. Short- and long-term outlooks clashed in Congress last week when the U.S. Senate passed the Medicare prescription drug "benefit," and handed drug and insurance companies a windfall by creating a new, largely privatized Medicare prescription plan. While it won’t meet the needs of most workers, it will add an estimated $13 billion to the drug companies’ current $192 billion yearly sales. Insurance companies will manage much of the program.

    But as Merck’s and Aetna’s bosses rejoiced that their industries’ record $139-million lobbying had paid off, liberals like Teddy Kennedy and Jay Rockefeller bitterly denounced the vote. For the drug and insurance companies, the U.S. health care system is an inexhaustible profit source, replenished with $1.7 trillion in expenditures every year. But Kennedy and Rockefeller serve capitalists who look beyond individual industries’ bottom line toward maintaining U.S. worldwide dominance by armed force. To the imperialists, health care is first and foremost an instrument of social control, one that is becoming more important as their war-making intensifies.

    Also, they see that medical costs for current workers and millions of retired and soon-to-be retiring workers are a tremendous drain on profits, especially in basic industry. They favor a more "universal" health care plan that will shift the burden from private employers to the government, paid for by workers’ taxes, and make the auto, steel and aerospace bosses more competitive with their European and Asian rivals. Their opposition to Bush has much more to do with strengthening U.S. imperialism than offering some crumbs to the working class.

    The Industrial College of the Armed Forces (ICAF), a government agency charged with planning the wartime mobilization of U.S. industry, says health care profoundly affects workers in the kinds of work they can do, in their fitness for military service, and in their general quality of life. But it warns, "…the U.S. does not presently have a carefully formulated and executable national health care strategy. Ensuring national security requires devising and implementing such a strategy.... Since the federal government is the single largest payer in the industry, the Department of Health & Human Services is the appropriate executive agent..." (ICAF Industry Survey, 2002). So the liberal war makers basically want two things: a health system more directly run by the federal government and, consequently, a working class more directly dependent on the feds for its health care.

    The liberals’ chief complaint about the Medicare scheme is that much of it will be out of government hands. That’s what Rockefeller and Kennedy mean when they criticize the drug and insurance profiteers. "The AARP [a big backer of the bill] is a business," said Rockefeller, "they have a product to sell." Kennedy shed crocodile tears for the elderly, "Let us not turn our backs on our senior citizens so insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies can charge senior citizens even higher prices."

    The Hart-Rudman Commission, which outlined the present agenda of increasing fascism and war, raised the same objection in its January 2001 report (eight months before 9-11). "The medical community has critical roles to play in homeland security. Catastrophic acts of terrorism or violence could cause casualties far beyond any imagined heretofore. Most of the American medical system is privately owned and now operates at close to capacity. An incident involving WMD will quickly overwhelm the capacities of local hospitals and emergency management professionals."

    The Medicare vote is a temporary setback for the liberal imperialists. In response they will only increase their efforts to control society. However, workers shouldn’t be fooled by their call for "universal care." This is not "socialized medicine," it is a fascist plan to increase proftis for basic industries and make workers more able to fight the bosses’ wars. The fight for communism to abolish the profit system and wage slavery will create the conditions to make the health of workers — who produce all value in society — a priority. Then preventive care will help alleviate and eventually end many of the diseases caused by capitalism — AIDS, malnutrition, stress — not to mention the myriad of illnesses spread by imperialism: Agent Orange, Gulf War Syndrome, the malnutrition and consequent death of half a million Iraqi children, cancer-causing depleted uranium and all the mental illnesses visited on soldiers on all sides of the bosses’ wars.

    The Fine Print: How the Drug Benefit Works

    Until 2006, seniors just get a discount card that might save them 15% on drugs. Then, when the "real" benefit kicks in, it works like this for each year:

    First $250: you pay 100%;

    Next $2,000: you pay 25%, Medicare pays 75%;

    Next $2,850: you pay 100%;

    After that (above total yearly drug costs of $5,100) you pay 5%, Medicare pays 95%.

    A Communist Alternative Plan

    Since workers make, package, transport, maintain and distribute all the medicines, how about this benefit plan:

    • We all get 100% of what we need and it’s all free.

    a name="Liberal Rulers’ Reform Plan: Education For War">">"iberal Rulers’ Reform Plan: Education For War

    The dominant liberal wing of U.S. rulers has a serious labor dilemma. On one hand, U.S. companies are laying off millions of workers in the current economic downturn while relocating millions of jobs overseas. On the other, the major capitalists will — eventually and inevitably — require millions of highly-skilled, loyal workers to man their war machine against an enemy the size of China, Europe or Russia. The Industrial College of the Armed Forces (ICAF), a secretive branch of the Defense Department responsible for planning the wartime mobilization of U.S. industry, warns of massive shortfalls in skilled labor over the next two decades resulting from downsizing in fields ranging from biotechnology to shipbuilding. Thus, even as they destroy vast numbers of jobs, the rulers’ war needs are driving them to create a large workforce well-trained in math and science. The ICAF identifies improving "math and science curricula for grades K-12" as a top priority.

    School systems nationwide are aiding the liberal imperialists by "raising standards" in these areas, though the effort and results are very uneven. Because racism infects everything the capitalists do, many urban schools today, with mostly black and Latin students, barely see a dime’s worth of improvement in math and science training. At the same time, suburban schools are implementing a flood of curriculum initiatives funded by the feds and establishment corporations and foundations. But at the time when the rulers need to mobilize for world war, they will undertake advanced technical training for many in the working class. Make no mistake. The math and science reform movement is fascism in sheep’s clothing. It serves the capitalists’ interests, not the students’.

    The math-science push forms an important part of the Hart-Rudman Commission reports, which stand as the clearest public expression of the rulers’ 25-year strategy for worldwide dominance. Hart-Rudman’s goal is to put the nation on a war footing for regional conflicts in the near term and world war down the road. Along with using terrorist attacks on U.S. soil to stir up patriotism, the Commission’s plans extend to refocusing schools and universities. Referring to math and science, Hart-Rudman’s 2000 report reads, "the inadequacies of our systems of research and education pose a greater threat to U.S. national security over the next quarter century than any potential conventional war that we might imagine. American national leadership must understand these deficiencies as threats to national security. If we do not invest heavily and wisely in rebuilding these two core strengths, America will be incapable of maintaining its global position."

    As an example, the ICAF, in its latest industry survey, cites semiconductors, which are essential to modern manufacturing and weapons: "U.S. chipmakers will require over 15,000 new electrical engineers (EE) in the early years of this century, yet EE graduates declined by 49% from 1988 to 1998, along with decreases in other important disciplines such as math and physics." In 2002, the ICAF visited Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Intel and other heavyweights in the military-industrial sphere. It found the woeful state of education in the U.S. hampering the merchants of death. "Given the recession, none noted any shortage of applicants. However, almost without exception they were frustrated by applicants’ lack of specific skills required for their industry. Most stated that applicants lacked the mechanical aptitude, knowledge, and technical background in basic math and sciences to propel their company in this highly competitive globalized economy."

    Liberal representative Rush Holt (D-NJ) is spearheading the Committee for Economic Development’s (CED) new campaign, Learning for the Future: Changing the Culture of Math and Science Education to Ensure a Competitive Workforce. It calls for the creation of business-school partnerships to make math and science more attractive to students. Executives from Exxon Mobil and Chevron Texaco sit on the CED’s board.

    A California-based organization called the Math-Science Network (MSN) advertises a seemingly praiseworthy aim, "to nurture girls’ interest in science and math courses and to encourage them to consider science and math-based career options." But MSN’s sponsors include such pillars of U.S. imperialism as JP Morgan Chase and Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, which helps develop the bosses’ murderous nuclear arsenal. The National Security Agency, which furnishes military intelligence to the Pentagon, runs summer programs in the mathematical sciences for high school and middle school teachers and students.

    Mathematical and scientific knowledge has a class character. Capitalists use it to exploit and make war on workers. Workers, on the other hand, must understand math and science in order to serve their own class. A working-class party cannot hope to grow or seize power without offering workable, technical solutions to a host of miseries caused or worsened by capitalism. The Soviet and Chinese Red Armies were able to make revolution and transform society in large measure because they educated the masses and themselves politically and technically to a degree unimagined by the capitalists. No one should confuse the kind of training the rulers want with the knowledge workers need.

    a name="‘The Story Behind the Story’"></">‘T"e Story Behind the Story’

    We are fond of saying "you got to be in it, to win it," in relation to the bosses’ mass organizations. An incident at work reminded me that "being in it" could also apply to mass sales of CHALLENGE.

    A friend I hadn’t seen for nearly 20 years recently transferred into my shop. I honestly couldn’t remember what kind of political relationship we had had. He was friendly now so I hesitantly gave him copies of our paper. He’s been a "casual" reader for the last few months.

    Last week, he buttonholed me as I was arriving at work. "What’s this all about," he asked, pointing to the headlines about the firing of Boeing’s CFO and a vice-president of the missile program. He was clear; he wanted to know the "story behind the story."

    I gave him a quick explanation about the bosses’ need to win us to sacrifice "blood and treasure" to support their continuous wars for imperialist dominance. I referred him to an article in a prior CHALLENGE that went into more detail. He went back to his machine and read (or re-read) it. He made a point of telling me it was "a really good article." He had gotten his "story behind the story."

    My friend hasn’t been in the shop long enough to be involved in any sharp class struggle with us. I sell a good number of papers, so I can’t have long, in-depth discussions with every reader, all the time. My friend was one of those co-workers with whom I’ve had only limited political discussions — and limited social relations to boot. Of course, I want to correct this over time.

    Given all these weaknesses, why would my friend seek me out to find the meaning of these headlines? After all, he had other friends—even closer friends — in the shop. I can only conclude that even his "casual" reading of our paper sent him in our direction.

    When we keep our eye on the ball, we are able to increase CHALLENGE circulation during sharp struggle, like contract negotiations, strikes and demonstrations. Unfortunately, we sometimes let our CHALLENGE networks wither when things quiet down. (I’m as guilty as anybody.) We mistakenly doubt the value of such "casual" readers.

    This little incident is a reminder that numbers—of readers—may not be everything, but they do count. CHALLENGE must be in the hands of large numbers of our co-workers if we want the working class to look to communist analysis to explain the increasing attacks on us. You got to circulate it (CHALLENGE), to win it — a significant base for revolutionary ideas.

    A Shop Comrade

    Mexico: Angry Workers Must Fight All Bosses

    MEXICO CITY, Nov. 27 — Over 150,000 workers, students and others — 100,000 in Mexico City and the rest in other cities — participated in a "megamarch" against the government’s plan to raise taxes on food and medicine. The protests also attacked the closing of government institutions and privatization of the energy industry, which will eliminate thousands of jobs. Politicians like M. Bartlet and C. Cárdenas, who represent the bosses who want to maintain state ownership of the energy industry, are using this mass anger for electoral purposes.

    In this era of growing imperialist rivalry over markets, capitalist crisis and war, the Mexican ruling class hasn’t done so well. Mexico has dropped to 30th place among the world’s exporters. China has replaced it as the leading provider of manufactured goods to the U.S. market. In 1997, China had 7.5% of the U.S. domestic market; Mexico had 10%. Today, these figures are reversed. Mexico has also lost foreign investments. China is now receiving $56 billion a year in direct investments, equal to all of Latin America.

    President Fox and COPARMEX (the bosses’ association) want to get out of this hole by taxing poor people even more, opening the energy industry to investors, slashing labor rights to increase productivity (á la the USA) and increasing exploitation.

    Slim, the richest boss in Mexico, CANACINTRA (another bosses’ association), Mexico City’s municipal bosses, some opposition politicians and union hacks from the Electrical Workers’ Union and National Workers’ Union (UNT) want to keep control of the energy industry and use it as the basis to reactivate the domestic market. Neither side is interested in the well-being of the working class. They all want to control the lion’s share of the wealth produced by workers, the fees paid by utility customers, etc. The nature of all bosses is to make profits exploiting workers.

    During the march, Rosendo Flores, head of the electrical workers’ union, and H. Juarez, of the telephone workers’ union, called for a nation-wide general strike if the Fox government doesn’t back down from the tax hikes and privatization plan. These union hacks want to become the "workers’ voice," replacing the old CTM labor federation hacks.

    PLP members have been organizing in neighborhoods and factories to give communist leadership to the growing anger of workers and youth. We’re supporting the struggles against layoffs and fascist working conditions, and to maintain basic services while exposing the union hacks and politicians as enemies of the workers.

    The distribution of CHALLENGE has grown. Many in the communities have sought our political guidance. Our political slogans in these struggles against the growing bosses’ attacks have been, "Abolish wage slavery" and "Fight local and foreign capitalists." This is a modest example of using our communist politics to build a mass base. Some of us participated in the Nov. 27 mega march, but we must increase our political work, strengthen our base-building and increase CHALLENGE distribution. This can puncture the political hold the fascist and liberal bosses and union sellouts have on the masses.

    a name="Grocery Strike: It’s Not Just Wal-Mart — It’s Capitalism!"></a>"rocery Strike: It’s Not Just Wal-Mart — It’s Capitalism!

    Los Angeles, Dec. 2 — The strike of 70,000 grocery workers in Southern California is entering its 8th week. The strikers face a 50% increase in healthcare costs, a two-tier wage system and an hourly wage-cap for new employees of $14.90 (after six years). Most are part-time and currently earn an average of $1,300 monthly. Many strikers are young black, Latin and Asian workers.

    On Oct. 11th, workers struck Vons and Pavilions. The owners of Ralph’s and Albertson’s immediately locked out their workers, swelling the total out to 70,000. Then, about two weeks into the strike, the unions announced it was alright to shop at Ralph’s, even though Ralph’s workers were locked out and the store was being run with scabs! (Pickets at other stores even carried signs saying "Shop at Ralph’s.") The strike was mainly run as a secondary boycott, asking customers not to shop at the markets.

    Many other workers, students and teachers have joined the picket lines and organized rallies supporting the strikers. Many shoppers have refused to cross the lines. Then on Nov. 25, the strike’s seventh week, Teamster truck drivers began refusing to carry goods from warehouses to the stores.

    The supermarket owners claim they must lower workers’ wages and heath care because Wal-Mart is coming to California with "Superstores" which will sell groceries and most everything else. Wal-Mart is non union and pays workers about $9 an hour with no health benefits. The New York Times has editorialized (11/15) in favor of the union and against Wal-Mart. They state grocery workers earn roughly $18,000 a year and lament that Wal-Mart workers earn only $14,000, "below the $15,060 poverty line for a family of three." They call for unionizing Wal-Mart and support the princely sum of $18,000 annually.

    The LA Times has run a three-part exposé of Wal-Mart for paying low wages not only to its own employees but also some of the lowest wages in the world to workers in Bangladesh, China and Honduras who make the low-cost products Wal-Mart sells. Many U.S. bosses view China as a serious long-term threat to U.S. imperialist world domination. An increasing amount of Wal-Mart’s products comes from China.

    Why all this concern about workers’ wages and health benefits from the bosses’ mouthpieces? One essay in the book "United We Serve" worried that immigrant workers need to be brought into the social fabric of this country, and that the unions are the best vehicle to win immigrants to trusting the system. The New York Times is not advocating decent wages and health care for all, only that workers receive the bare minimum needed to live, rather than under the minimum, and that this be sanctified by a union.

    The fact is U.S. imperialism is spending half a trillion dollars a year on wars and paying for them with workers’ taxes, forcing states like California into multi-billion dollar deficits. Then Schwarzenegger follows suit by cutting social services to reduce the deficit. All this leaves nothing to cover workers’ health care, and the profit-driven bosses certainly don’t want to pay for it.

    For their own reasons, the rulers are attacking Wal-Mart as the source of low wages and benefits. But the source is not just Wal-Mart. It’s capitalism that forces workers worldwide into poverty and war in its constant competition for maximum profit. It’s capitalism that must be destroyed to secure a decent future for workers’ families.

    PLP members and friends have taken CHALLENGE and leaflets to the picket lines. We need to consistently go to the pickets at our local stores, developing ties with these workers that can continue long after the strike is over. Strikes usually represent more intense class struggle and offer opportunities to win workers to more advanced, communist ideas which explain the problems caused by capitalism. While calling for support for the strikers, we’ve also pointed out that a system based on competition for maximum profits is less and less able to provide the basic necessities for workers. That’s why the long-term solution to low wages, lack of health care and a war economy is to fight for a communist society based not on profits but on meeting workers’ needs.

    Free Trade Meeting Flops; Cops Riot

    MIAMI, Nov. 21 — The Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) meeting here was a flop for Bush’s administration plans to expand a U.S.-controlled NAFTA to the entire continent. The growing capitalist-imperialist rivalry over markets and low-paid workers caused it to fail before it even began. The biggest bosses of South American (Brazil, Venezuela and Argentina) want a bigger share of the exploitation, while the Bush gang basically wants it all. The former are working with U.S. imperialist rivals in Europe who oppose the U.S. excluding them from a free trade agreement. (Germany is the main investor in Brazil.)

    Miami cops rioted against demonstrators who were protesting the FTAA meeting. The protesters were mainly from peace groups, student and anti-war organizations, as well as unions like the United Steelworkers Union. They were ordered to disperse and then surrounded, beaten, shot with rubber bullets, arrested, and held on phony charges of "assaulting" the cops.

    The police riot was planned and financed with $8,000,000 according to the new rules of the fascist Homeland Security. Specific features of this cop attack include:

    • "Embedding" the media (as in Iraq) — placing them under direct control of the cops and military;

    • Some "embedded" reporters attacked the demonstrators alongside the cops. Independent reporters, not "embedded," were attacked as though they were demonstrators.

    • Plainclothes cops dressed in black, like the anarchist "black bloc," to infiltrate and attack groups of demonstrators.

    Part of the explanation for this cop violence is no doubt due to conditions specific to Florida. Jeb Bush, the President’s brother, is governor and fascist Cuban exile groups are very strong in Miami. The gusano leaders don’t allow any "freedom of speech" or unionizing activity in order to keep Miami a low-wage haven and one of the poorest urban areas in the U.S.

    Cops are parasites, not workers. Their job is to protect the bosses’ profits. But on the whole, police repression is a sign of weakness, not strength. The ruling class is less tolerant of dissent, and more open to brute force, an aspect of fascism. The fact that union officials were present, protested and attacked is a sign of the polarization within the ruling class over the war, as well as over NAFTA/FTAA.

    Sweeney and the AFL-CIO made a deal with the cops to protect themselves from police attack. They’re agents of that section of the ruling class that wants to use the unions to build deadly nationalism in gaining U.S. domination of Latin America. Sweeney and the AFL-CIO may oppose NAFTA/FTAA, but they support U.S. domination of Latin America.

    The function of liberal candidates like Kucinich and Dean is to suck dissent back into the Democratic Party and the electoral process, like McCarthy and McGovern did in ’68 and ’72 during the Vietnam War.

    When mainstream Democrats like the Al Gores and Jimmy Carters attack Homeland Security for "violating human rights," they’re really attacking the Bush gang for acting in a way that doesn’t win the masses to collaborate in their own repression. After all, the Democratic Party voted overwhelmingly for the Patriot Act.

    PLP has dealt with fascist-like police in the past, from fighting the armed attack by racist ROAR in Boston in 1975, to May Day demonstrations in L.A. and New York in the ’90s, when demonstrations were banned and we had to rely on special tactics, secure planning, and discipline among demonstrators. Undisciplined, mass groups of demonstrators, no matter how well-intentioned, are sitting ducks for police and provocateur attacks like those in Miami or Milan.

    The mis-leadership of the Miami demonstrations is responsible for many of the casualties. Most of the liberals, anarchists and fake leftists who oppose the war or FTAA also actively oppose discipline. They spread the anti-communist lie that proletarian discipline — acting in unity — "stifles the individual."

    Casualties are never completely avoidable. But they’re maximized by encouraging large groups of demonstrators to mass and protest as a leaderless crowd, and minimized by a planned, disciplined response. Masses of people can be won to the latter.

    The positive aspect of such demonstrations is that more and more people — including workers — see the need to protest. An example: when police were harassing young protestors in Guzman Park, a group of steel workers surrounded the cops and stopped their attack. With PLP’s active participation, police violence, however effective in the short run, can help people shed their illusions, and their anti-communism too. We should be working with these honest forces, to win them to revolutionary communist conclusions.

    a name="Cincinnati’s Killer Kops Kill Again">">"incinnati’s Killer Kops Kill Again

    CINCINNATI, OH, Dec. 1 — Cincinnati’s killer cops have struck again. Last night cops Baron Osterman and James Pike beat 41-year old Nathaniel Jones to death. After clubbing him unconscious with their night sticks, they and four other cops stood around and watched him die while waiting for an ambulance to arrive. The beating was videotaped by a camera running in their police car. Racist Mayor Luken and police chief Streicher are defending their paid assassins. Although the coroner has since ruled it a homicide, don’t hold your breath waiting for any racist cop to be convicted.

    Early Sunday morning, prior to the cop beating, a worker at a fast food restaurant had called for emergency medical help after seeing Jones passed out on the grass outside. By the time the EMT’s first arrived, Jones was awake, and they reported that he was "becoming a nuisance," so they left and the police were called. By the time the cops were done with him, he was finally in an ambulance, and died upon arriving at the hospital.

    The Cincinnati cops are a band of racist terrorists with a history. After a string of racist killings, a rebellion erupted in April 2001. PLP made several trips there, and CHALLENGE and our comrades were warmly received by the rebels. As we go to press, we’re contacting our friends and planning to show the red flag there again.

    Imperialist war and fascist Homeland Security, mass poverty, unemployment and racist police terror is how the "world’s only superpower" has ushered in the 21st century. The sooner we destroy them, the more lives we’ll save.

    a name="Hawk Hillary Criticizes ‘Bushites’: Not Enough Troops"></">Ha"k Hillary Criticizes ‘Bushites’: Not Enough Troops

    Bush’s Thanksgiving visit to Baghdad airport has backfired, as has much of what his government has done in Iraq. Most Iraqis — and millions worldwide — saw it as a cheap stunt like his Top Gun landing on an aircraft carrier back in May, declaring the war over. No sooner had Bush left the airport, Spanish intelligence agents, Japanese diplomats and Korean contract workers were killed by Iraqi insurgents. Then came the Nov. 30 all-day Samarra battle which U.S. forces claim killed 54 insurgents, but Iraqis said was basically a massacre of civilians. U.S. troops have orders to shoot anything that moves if they’re attacked. So now 80% of the Iraqi population — which Bush said he would "free" from Saddam Hussein — want U.S. troops out.

    Bush’s Iraqi visit was followed by Hillary Clinton’s, who wanted to prove she’s as much of a Hawk (warmaker) as the Bushites. Hillary had come from Afghanistan where the Taliban and its allies have taken the offensive, and the U.S. puppet Karzai government only controls its heavily defended Kabul compound. Hillary stayed longer than Bush in Iraq, although spending the night safely in Kuwait. She "criticized" the Bushites for not dispatching more troops to assure U.S. control of Iraqi oil.

    The liberal Hawks, like the N.Y. Times, are very worried about the Bush gang’s screw-up in Iraq. The paper proposes to divide Iraq into three regions: Kurdish, Shiite and Sunni. Only the Kurds and Shiites have oil fields, which, of course, the U.S. will control. This "divide and conquer" strategy will be accompanied by ethnic cleansing, similar to the former Yugoslavia after the collapse of the old Soviet Union when Germany and the U.S. carved it up into several smaller countries run by their local lackeys.

    The Iraqi working class has a long history of supporting communist politics. The old Iraqi Communist Party (ICP) was the leading political force there, with a leadership and membership reflecting Iraq’s different ethnic groups of Iraq — Kurds, Shiites, Sunnis, Christians and Jews. On May 1, 1959, over one million workers and others marched with Red Flags under communist leadership. But following the old communist movement, the ICP pursued the line of national liberation, uniting with "lesser evil" bosses. Instead of leading workers and their allies to power, the old ICP allied itself with nationalist politicians and generals (even with Hussein for a while), before these "progressive" bosses murdered tens of thousands of communists and others. Today, the old ICP even supports the pro-U.S. Governing Council of Iraq.

    But there are still many workers and their allies who oppose the U.S.-UK occupation forces, and understand that the old Baath loyalists and Jihad (fundamentalist) fighters are not the answer. The need to build a new revolutionary communist movement is the key task facing workers in Iraq, the entire Middle East and the world. That’s what we in PLP fight for.

    New Communist International Movement Must Bury Dark Ages

    Our last issue explained how the 1917 communist-led Russian Revolution, which freed 1/6 of the world’s surface from capitalism, was the single most important event of the 20th Century. It was followed by the Red Army’s defeat of the Nazi war machine, freeing humanity from becoming one huge concentration camp. However, the third most important event of the 20th century for the world’s working class was the collapse of the old communist movement, marked by the rise of state capitalism and later free market capitalism in the former Soviet Union and in China.

    Stalin said the destruction of the USSR and the International Communist Movement (ICM) would bring humanity back to the dark ages. History has proven him right:

    The former Soviet republics and socialist camp have been turned into a hell for workers. While a few became multi-millionaires, stealing the wealth built by workers in the former socialist bloc, the norm for the majority of people is mass unemployment, gut-wrenching poverty, war, prostitution, drug trafficking and chaos. The latest example is the power struggle over the billions to be reaped from pipelines in the former Soviet republic of Georgia.

    While during the Cultural Revolution, left-wing forces in China tried to prevent the return to capitalism, this gigantic fight against revisionism (capitalist forces masquerading as communists) was defeated by the vacillations of the pro-Mao forces. Now China has become the world’s largest manufacturing center, based on tens of millions of workers being paid dirt wages. The return of capitalism has left hundreds of millions unemployed, with no social safety net.

    The few countries that still consider themselves socialist, like Vietnam and Cuba, are basically building capitalism. To top it off, a U.S. navy frigate visited Vietnam last month for the first time since U.S. imperialist forces were kicked out of that country after murdering over three million Vietnamese.

    The defeat of the old ICM also has affected workers in the rest of the capitalist world. In Western Europe and the U.S., workers have suffered wage-cuts, union-busting and a decline in their standard of living as a direct consequence of the lack of an ICM strong enough to fight capitalism. The union hacks in these countries have sold out even more to capitalism since the defeat of the ICM.

    Now unions represent less than 10% of the workforce in France and figures in the U.S. and other countries are approaching that. Germany’s powerful IG Metall Union’s strikes ended earlier this year without winning even small crumbs, something not seen in many decades. Workers have paid for the anti-communism of the union leaders — or reformism of the so-called "leftist" union leaders in Italy and France — in massive job losses and wage-cuts. The racism of many union leaders, especially in the U.S., has been deadly for workers.

    Emerging from the Dark Ages

    While this era of wars, fascist terror, mass joblessness, diseases like AIDS killing millions in Africa and other areas, is upon us, every dark night has its end. PLP is a product of both the old ICM and the struggle against its revisionism. We are daily fighting to learn from its great battles and achievements and also from the deadly errors that led to its collapse, mainly that reformism, racism and all forms of concessions to capitalism only lead workers to defeat. Give a boss one centimeter and he/she will grab a mile.

    CHALLENGE reflects that struggle, which must go on constantly since we live in a capitalist society which bribes a few to help oppress billions. Our job as communists is to bring our revolutionary politics to workers, not to create illusions that capitalism can be reformed. A mass base of readers and sellers of CHALLENGE can be the ideological tool to help turn workers’ struggles into schools for communism. But we cannot do this from the outside. We must be involved in every class struggle workers are waging, from the LA transit and Southern California grocery strikes to the recent violent mass strikes in the Dominican Republic and Bolivia; from the international anti-war movement to the fight against globalization (imperialism); from the fight against racist police brutality to the struggles against sexist exploitation of women workers in the world’s maquiladoras — but always with the outlook that the only way out of the Dark Ages is to rebuild the ICM and fight for a society without bosses: communism.

    a name="California Fire Destruction One More Cost of Bosses’ War">">"alifornia Fire Destruction One More Cost of Bosses’ War

    The fires are out in Southern California, but the damage is enormous: 16 dead, 3,400 homes destroyed and hundreds of thousands of acres burned. Smoke and ash covered most of the county. School was canceled for a week because it was dangerous to breathe outdoors. One of the fires in San Diego County was the biggest in California history, destroying whole communities.

    Given the severe drought and high winds, brush fires were inevitable. But the fires’ size and the damage done was not inevitable and would have been far less if San Diego County actually had a fire department. The city of San Diego has, but with far less equipment than needed, and what it has is ancient. In the County’s eastern part, where the fires started and most of the deaths occurred, many areas have no fire coverage at all. Local fire districts have so little taxing authority (since Proposition 13 passed) that they must run bake sales and raffles to buy equipment.

    The devastation was no surprise. In a report drafted in 2002 but made public only now, San Diego officials predicted a fire of "biblical" proportions exactly where the Cedar fire actually occurred, and a probability of successful containment of under 10%.

    Experienced firefighters claim they could have saved many more structures if they had had enough equipment. They also assert that projects to clear brush and provide safety zones around houses have been grossly under-funded and delayed for years — in some cases for decades — by red tape.

    Preventing fire deaths and loss of homes isn’t rocket science; it’s simply way down the priority list for U. S. bosses, who are spending our taxes to grab Iraqi oil, trying to maintain their "top dog" status among imperialists. The U.S. empire’s growing crisis has led to increasingly fascist policies that reach down to the local level, resulting in deep financial crisis for state and local governments nation-wide., slashing basic services and infrastructure. Bush, Governor Davis and Governor-elect Schwarzenegger briefly visited the fire zone and cynically praised the heroism of the firefighters (one of whom died), but do nothing to change the basic situation.

    The firefighters were denied the tools for this fire, and won’t get them for next fire, given California’s projected $10 billion deficit next year. The devastation of these fires is one more item on the bill U.S. bosses are making us pay to cover the cost of their drive for world domination.

    San Diego Red

    Chicago Dinner Marks CHALLENGE Role in Building PLP

    CHICAGO, IL Nov. 22— Tonight more than 50 workers and young people participated in our CHALLENGE dinner, raising over $500 for our paper. The evening was hosted by a black woman Cook County Hospital worker who recently joined PLP. The previous night, about three dozen college and high school students and teachers held a similar event.

    The black, Latin and white workers were treated to good food, entertainment from a PLP high school student rapper and a wonderful singing group of students and teachers. Another County worker, a black woman whose son is stationed in Iraq, read two revolutionary poems.

    A Latin comrade who recently participated in the Immigrant Workers Freedom Ride explained how the liberal politicians and union hacks staged the event to build support among immigrants for U.S. imperialism and fascist Homeland Security, even as they face increased fascist attacks. She said there was no "freedom" in this ride, but there were plenty of opportunities to build a mass base for PLP and communist revolution. She was speaking from experience. Just two days earlier, a dozen young riders and their friends had attended a PLP study group.

    The PLP keynote speaker described the crisis facing US imperialism in Iraq, and how it faces a possible strategic defeat in the Middle East that would dwarf the one in Vietnam. He pointed out how the liberal media and Democratic presidential candidates were even more committed than Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld to staying in Iraq for the long haul, and that the liberal union leaders, clergy and all the mass organizations would pull out all the stops in the coming year to get these killers elected.

    Mainly he stressed that the two most important ingredients in building PLP is confidence in the Party and confidence in the workers; they can be won and will come through. The principal aspect is having confidence that workers can and will be won to communist ideas if we struggle with them. He gave examples from 30 years of personal experience how CHALLENGE played a role in winning workers to support, defend and join PLP. He asked those at the dinner to drop their "bosses’ flags" — dollars — into the bucket so we can turn them into more red flags — CHALLENGE. They gave generously.

    This talk was followed by a skit written and performed by Cook County Hospital workers about winning their co-workers to read and distribute CHALLENGE. After more songs and a "Fight-Back" rap, the evening concluded with everyone singing the Internationale.

    Reform over Revolution Alive and Well in the Matrix Trilogy

    "The Matrix," the first of the movie trilogy, depicted a science fiction allegory of class antagonisms in society. On the one hand was the energy-exploiting class of machines; on the other hand, the humans who are used for their energy to produce the machines’ power. The Matrix represented the illusionary world that humans believed they lived in (representing false consciousness) to mask the horrific existence of the world. The main characters Morpheus, Neo and Trinity are the leaders of the humans in Zion, the underground world where humans are living independently from the machines and preparing for a revolt against them.

    The main protagonist is a messiah-type named "Neo," slated to lead the machine-enslaved people to "freedom." He uses his special forces to disable the machines. This has always been a significant weakness of the Matrix movies — they rely on the miracle savior, not the masses, to save humanity.

    The machines enslave people’s minds and suck their energy in order to build their war machines, and live like parasites (an allegorical reference to the capitalist bosses) off the entire mass of humanity. Throughout these movies, Neo is pursued by Agent Smith who was sent to destroy the rebellion. In this final installment of the trilogy, Agent Smith has broken through the boundaries of the Matrix and infinitely duplicates himself to become a loose cannon force that the machines can no longer control.

    "Revolutions" — the last of the trilogy — betrays the idea that the humans must defeat their greatest enemy, the machines, and sinks into petty reformism. Since the Agent Smiths have broken into the world of Zion, Neo believes he is a greater threat than the machines. The reactionary messiah Neo uses his "spiritual" sense to negotiate a deal with the machines to destroy Agent Smith.

    The entire battle strength of the human revolution was wasted defending Zion, instead of attacking the machines in their own yard where the human forces would have certainly won. The combined might of the humans and Neo could have overwhelmed and destroyed the parasitic machines. Instead, we have an uneasy truce negotiated by the sellout Neo.

    The movie ends with the "Architect" saying every human trapped in the Matrix would have a "choice" of whether or not to leave the Matrix. Freedom for the human race would have required the people of Zion to destroy the Architect, since he created that world.

    Many left-wing people were drawn into some "progressive" elements of the Matrix movies — the multi-racial character of the people of Zion, men and women fighting together against the machines, and special effects (technology) never depicted before.

    In this movie, communists can see the dangers of allying with "lesser-evil" bosses against "greater-evil" bosses. All bosses are part of the parasitic machine of capitalism — the machine that is fueled by the blood and sweat of the workers and serves the bosses’ class interests. The communist PLP leading the working class aims to destroy the machine of capitalism. We won’t ally with "lesser-evil bosses," nor follow ideologically reactionary leaders, nor lying religious and union leaders, because we want to smash the Machine, not reform or "balance" it.

    LETTERS

    a name="‘Nickled and Dimed’ Bets on Legislation, Not Workers’ Power"></a>"Nickled and Dimed’ Bets on Legislation, Not Workers’ Power

    I was just "Nickled and Dimed" out of $22 and I’m not happy about it. "Nickled and Dimed" is a new play costing $22 admission. I saw it with a great group of people, many of whom, unfortunately, thought well of it.

    It’s based on Barbara Ehrenreich’s book of the same name and shines a light on some of the difficulties that confront workers in poverty-wage jobs. Ehrenreich investigated by going "underground" and waitressing in a Denny’s, cleaning rooms in a motel and as a Wal-Mart sales clerk.

    A nationally-published writer herself, she comes somewhere from the upper middle of the middle class and discovers during the course of the play the social distance between herself and her new-found co-workers.

    Yet despite all her traveling, she goes nowhere. In key ways she merely reproduces the same assumptions about class that she thinks she is critiquing.

    Lenin saw intellectuals as the social force that introduced communist ideas to a working class capable of organizing a revolution for workers’ power. Ehrenreich, the intellectual, surveys a working class that panics at the thought of militancy, remains ignorant or dis-believing of its own exploitation and lacks any class consciousness as it greedily shops at Wal-Mart.

    The intellectual is stripped of any revolutionary role among workers because workers themselves are nothing but passive consumers of their own exploitation. That is a world view hardly differing from any other capitalist ideologue.

    In short, "Nickled and Dimed" is anti-communist, presenting a world view where revolution is completely impractical. Unspoken in the play is the need for Uncle Sam to wrap his protective arm around the working class with liberal legislation. Legislation, not revolution — that’s the theme of her play.

    A Comrade

    Fare Hike, Pay Cut Gives CEO Bonus

    San Francisco’s Director of Transportation Michael Burns received a 28% pay increase to $280,000 (up from $220,000). Drivers were upset because their pay was CUT 7.5% while bus fares were increased, all in the name of balancing the city’s budget.

    The bosses rewarded Burns for overseeing the fare hike and pay cut without any fight-back.

    Corporations frequently give their CEO’s big raises after saving millions of dollars — and increasing profits — by laying off workers. Burns’ $60,000 salary increase is small potatoes compared to what the bosses netted from the 7.5% wage-cut and fare hike.

    It’s our responsibility to expose how, under capitalism, "you get what you pay for" — the bosses reward their henchmen well. When workers run the state, there will be no bosses and everyone will be provided with a quality standard of living.

    Red Bus Rider

    a name="‘Over-consumption’ vs. ‘More Consumption’?"></a>‘O"er-consumption’ vs. ‘More Consumption’?

    Concerning the letter (CHALLENGE, 11/19) criticizing the article, "Enviromentalism: A Communist Perspective, A Capitalist Nightmare." The reader’s main criticisms were : (1) The article’s sources are "mainstream" bourgeois sources and are therefore bad; (2) The article says the problem is "over-consumption," a typical bourgeois Green argument that blames consumers for environmental damage and suggests individual, voluntary strategies for change. I disagree.

    (1) Communists often mine bourgeois sources for vital facts with which to build their own arguments. This has been true from Marx to Lenin to PLP. The fact is that research on environmental issues is done overwhelmingly by bourgeois intellectuals. Criticizing the article merely for using bourgeois sources is just unreasonable.

    (2) Nowhere does the article blame individual consumers as the source of environmental damage or suggest that individual choice is the basis for change. In fact, the first part of this series criticizes Green groups for doing just these things. Yes, the article does stress the existence of relatively high consumption rates among the imperialist nations, but mainly to show that consumption patterns are racist. It also stresses that capitalist production and "consumerism" create much unnecessary waste due to packaging brand competition, built-in premature product obsolescence, advertising costs and a lack of concern for recycling and waste management.

    Because of greater efficiency and less waste in a planned communist economy, individual consumption levels will increase for all workers, while the volume of material and labor that goes into each product or service will decrease, just as it did in the transition from feudalism to capitalism. Though misleadingly worded and inadequately explained, I think this is what is meant by the phrase, "As goods and services are socialized, individual consumption levels will decrease."

    For instance, socialized housing, entertainment and transportation will simultaneously meet more needs for more people while decreasing the amount of raw material and labor needed to service each person. This material and labor then can be freed up for building recycling plants and many other necessary components of a sustainable communist economy. This isn’t "barracks room communism." It’s just plain communist sense.

    A Red-thumbed comrade

    Interfaith Meeting Discusses War, Racism

    Recently our interfaith Justice & Peace Coalition held its third annual weekend conference. There were many strengths: (1) It was planned and attended by Catholic, Protestant and Jewish people who understand the need to link the struggle against racist oppression of working people directly to the bosses’ imperialist wars and fascist repression; (2) there was significant participation by black working and professional people and a few Hispanic workers; (3) more comrades boldly attempted to raise and explain important aspects of the Party’s line, such as U.S. conquests are not due to an "ultra right" political element bent on "Empire" but derive from the imperialism which both liberal and right-wing politicians must serve to stay in the game as ruling class back-up; (4) Although there were fewer people than last year (having had the illusion we could have prevented the invasion of Iraq, given the nature of the current anti-war movement), the discussions were even more serious and focused on actions. We will have two community-based demonstrations — "JOBS, NOT OCCUPATIONS" — and concerts, vigils and seminars on justice and peace themes. Most important, 20 people signed up for committees to expand this work.

    A student reporter from a university near our churches attended and shared the positive assessment but suggested there were not enough young people involved (we agreed and suggested he help to organize youth!). He also said one comrade who spoke against nationalism and for equality had equated the regimes of Mandela and DeKlerk in South Africa. With discussion, he better understood our criticisms of national liberation vs. communist revolution. He and the two chief comrade/organizers also agreed we had not focused enough on building a movement against the racist expansion of the university into our community.

    We will have ample opportunity to correct this failing and will meet many new people to share experiences with and struggle to recruit in the coming months.

    Gnawing At Imperialism,

    Red Churchmouse

    Winning $upport For CHALLENGE

    I distribute over 200 copies of CHALLENGE each issue by staying in touch with people who like the paper. Each year I start the school term discussing the future. I observe who speaks up and give them CHALLENGE. Towards the end of the school year, I ask them if they would like to continue getting the paper in the summer.

    I also offer the paper to adults at the school who express leftist ideas and to people I’ve known a long time. I’ve also been active in the teachers union and distribute it there as well.

    Periodically I check if the regular readers want to start distributing it to others. Thirteen regular readers now take extra papers.

    I leave 70 copies at various cafes and neighborhood centers where other groups leave their literature. Sometimes the people working there are also interested in the paper.

    I feel it’s better to distribute the paper to many people than to sell it to a few. However, I try to have serious discussions with the regular readers about their thoughts on CHALLENGE and revolution, and ask them to support the paper financially. Presently eight people contribute. I’m sure others would donate if I made the time for such discussions.

    Red Teacher

    CHALLENGE COMMENT: It’s good "Red Teacher" spreads the paper so widely. However, perhaps he/she should ask for a donation after someone has received a few issues, rather than waiting an entire school year, and suggest this idea to those 13 now taking extra papers. Paying for the paper does indicate a certain level of commitment, a realization that CHALLENGE has no big boss advertisers but is dependent on the working class for its ability to publish. Circulation of CHALLENGE should not depend on pitting some limited free distribution against asking for regular donations. And we heartily agree that the writer should make time for more "serious discussions with regular readers" to win them to support the paper financially.

    Look Forward to CHALLENGE

    The recent article on the history of CHALLENGE-DESAFIO (CD) was important. I remember a movie depicting Russian soldiers at the front during World War I. They were eagerly grabbing "Iskra" or some other communist newspaper. They craved communist analyses of the war and other social events.

    I can recall, along with friends and comrades, eagerly awaiting the next issue of C-D. What was Watergate all about? What were the strengths and weakness of the recent mass march? What about that movie everyone’s been seeing? And currently, what’s really happening in Iraq and the Middle East?

    We may not be in the same pressure-packed, pre-revolutionary situation as Russian soldiers in 1917, but a lot is going on in the world. I feel today, there’s not the same craving for C-D’s information and perspectives, not the same looking forward to the next issue. Some of our friends just don’t see the paper as providing information and insights that are vital to their lives.

    Is this impression correct? Is it true for many members and friends or just some? Is it a problem just for younger people? If there’s some truth to this, then we have a problem. If Party members and friends don’t look forward to the paper and see it as an important part of their lives, they are unlikely to be go-getters in distributing the paper.

    I suggest Party leaders, members and readers of the paper weigh in on this issue. Is it that people just don’t read any papers these days? Should we consider other media and forms of communication? I doubt that’s all there is to it, but it’s worth considering. Do we need a greater variety of articles so the paper touches more aspects of people’s lives? Do articles need to be shorter, clearer?

    What can we do to ensure that in this period, Party members, friends and co-workers really look forward to the next issue of C-D?

    Mid West Comrade

    Communist Ideas Answer Fascism

    In early November, I attended a conference in the Chicago area on the war and healthcare. I was invited by a friend who reads and subscribes to the ideas in CHALLENGE. He helped organize the conference.

    I was delighted to see a multi-racial audience that was heavily working-class. It was so crowded I had to stand.

    When the first speaker denounced the war on Iraq, I got carried away but then asked myself why he didn't mention the working class taking state power.

    There was a speaker explaining the horrific effects of depleted uranium ammunition the capitalist bosses used in Iraq (including the first Persian Gulf War). A Michigan war vet also gave a great talk on a soldier's view of the war and there was a discussion of the pros and cons of using electoral tactics to oppose the war. I also saw a leaflet from PLP.

    Later in the evening, my friend hosted a delicious spaghetti dinner attended by many from the conference. In this relaxed atmosphere, communist ideas were more forcefully discussed.

    The last two years some of us have become pessimistic because fascism has become more oppressive, but CHALLENGE has persistently opposed this. There seems to be a small break in the support for fascism.

    This event should encourage us to emulate it in advancing the cause of communism.

    A red pharmacist

    a name="Church Group Hears Need To Win GI’s">">"hurch Group Hears Need To Win GI’s

    I'm a member of a church group involved in many struggles. Recently they've launched a campaign against ROTC and military recruiters on school campuses. Unfortunately the group sees our working-class brothers and sisters in the military as enemies. But the vast majority of youth join the military because of economic, occupational or educational necessity, not because they want to sacrifice their lives to defend U.S. imperialism.

    U.S. rulers are impelled to launch their wars to guarantee their control of oil profits. As long as they hold power, they'll find a way to fill their armies with working-class youth and spill barrels of blood to ensure they control the oil.

    The U.S. war against Vietnam showed there's always a debate and struggle within the military. Some GI's were won to a racist outlook and participated in massacres of civilians. But others saw the officers as their real class enemy and participated in rebellions and fraggings [killing officers with fragmentary grenades]. This struggle occurs in the military now. Soldiers are asking themselves who is the real enemy, Iraqi workers or the capitalist bosses? We must put forward our answer to that question.

    Many young people in the church can understand the role soldiers have played in revolutionary movements. Both in Russia and China, soldiers were crucial to the triumph of the revolutions. Will our working-class youth in the military be won to a fascist outlook in which they murder other workers for bosses' profits or will they be won to an internationalist, communist outlook to join the long-term struggle to liberate the working class from capitalist domination? Dealing with these questions with our friends forms the basis for bigger struggles.

    Being involved in a church group is difficult but important. Without us, the bosses' ideas have more chance of taking hold of our working-class youth and repressing a revolutionary outlook. Reformism and an anti-working class outlook prepare the groundwork for fascism. We must see these church groups as "schools for communism" and confront the bosses' ideas and fascist plans. The role of soldiers in imperialist wars and in communist revolutionary movements is crucial. We need to be in that struggle to win it.

    A Red in the mass movement

    Red Eye On The News

    BELOW ARE EXCERPTS FROM MAINSTREAM NEWSPAPERS THAT CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION:Abbreviations: NYT=New York Times, GW=Guardian Weekly (UK)

    Capitalists murder the most

    Most credible estimates confirm that, in the aggregate, white collar and corporate crimes cost the U.S. hundreds of billions of dollars annually — far more than conventional categories of crime such as burglary and robbery….

    But corporate crime isn’t just about the money. It’s also about people’s lives. The national murder rate has hovered around 16,000 a year in recent years…. But a respected group of occupational health and safety investigations, led by J. Paul Leigh, a University of California Davis School of Medicine professor, has estimated that in 1992 alone there were 66,971 deaths resulted from job-related injuries and occupational diseases. These numbers do not include the thousands of annual deaths caused by cancers linked to corporate pollution, deaths from defective products, tainted foods and other corporate-related causes. Los Angeles Times, 11/5)

    Dems would keep Iraq grab

    Invading Iraq…cost so far…400 American lives and (one study suggests) at least 11,000 Iraqi lives….

    Democrats are having a field day pointing out the problems, but their suggestions for what to do next are pretty unhelpful….

    I’ve asked two Democratic presidential candidates, Richard Gephardt and another who spoke off the record, if it’s really credible to offer the UN and NATO as a solution to Iraq. They harrumph a bit in a way that I interpret to mean: "Maybe not, but it works in front of the cameras." (NYT, 11/19)

    Afghan botch, omen for Iraq

    The talk of what to do next is sounding rather like Afghanistan. And that’s alarming, because we have flubbed the peace in Afghanistan even more egregiously than in Iraq….

    In at least three districts in the southeast, there is no central government representation, and the Taliban had de facto control. In Paktika and Zabul, not only have most schools closed, but the conservative madrasas are regaining strength.

    "We’ve operated in Afghanistan for about 15 years," said Nancy Lindborg of Mercy Corps, the American aid group, "and we’ve never had the insecurity that we have now." (NYT, 11/15)

    Afghan women still suffer

    I have just read the 47-page Amnesty International report on the status of Afghan women, issued in October. And I still wouldn’t want to be a woman in Afghanistan.

    Amnesty found physical violence against women in the home. Underage and forced marriage. Trading of women and girls to pay off debts, Rape and abduction by armed groups. Fear and shame hindering access to desperately needed medical, legal and social assistance. Courts colluding with families to imprison rebellious teenagers.

    In parts of Afghanistan, Amnesty reported, women claim that the insecurity and the risk of sexual violence they face make their lives worse than before.

    One woman said, "During the Taliban era if a woman sent to market and showed off an inch of flesh, she would have been flogged, now she’s raped." (San Antonio Express-News)

    Regime-change goal: help biz

    Dwight D. Eisenhower became president in 1953.

    On Aug. 19, 1953, Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh of Iran became the first victim of a C.I.A. coup. Ten months later, on June 27, 1954, President Jacobo Arbenz of Guatemala became the second….

    Several dozen scholars, including leading experts on Iran and Guatemala, gathered in Chicago this month….All agreed that both coups the first that the C.I.A. carried out — had terrible long-term effects,

    "It’s quite clear that the 1953 coup cut short a move toward democracy in Iran."

    …."The C.I.A. intervention began a ghastly cycle of violence, assassination and torture in Guatemala….It really set the precedent for later intervention in Cuba, British Guiana, Brazil and Chile. (NYT, 11/30)

    $ystem = hunger amid food

    According to a report released Tuesday by the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization….Between 1999 and 2001,…more than 840 million people, or one in seven, went hungry [worldwide]….The number of malnourished people …grew by an average of 4.5 million a year….

    The rise in hunger came even though the world produced ample food…. (NYT, 11/26)

    Blue collars hung out to dry

    Almost one in six manufacturing jobs has disappeared. The number of industrial workers in America has fallen from 17.3 million to 14.6 million. Unlike previous recessions, when factories downsized and then rehired, many now are closing their doors for good, either going bust or moving production to the developing world where costs are far lower. Economists agree it will be difficult to slow the decline, let alone reverse it.

    The social costs are enormous. Unemployment in Buffalo, a once proud steelmaking city and trading post with Canada, is 10.2%, well above the national average. The city is bankrupt and in the hands of a control board. Schools are closing and Main Street is a forlorn picture of boarded up shops….

    Ford is in the process of cutting 12,000 jobs in North America….Levi’s, an American icon, will no longer produce clothing in the U.S. Motorola…has already cut thousands of jobs. ( British Guardian Weekly, 12/3)

    Brass: Smash Iraq to save it

    American efforts to prevent attacks continued Tuesday, when American fighter jets bombed suspected guerilla positions near Tikrit, in central Iraq. Commanders called in AC-130 gunships, A-10 attack planes and Apache helicopter gunships, as well as Air Force F-16 and F-15E fighter-bombers with 500-pound bombs, the military said, in the largest bombardment in the area since President Bush declared the end of major combat on May 1….

    General Swannack said…we are not going to fight this one with one hand tied behind our backs." Echoing a historical quote from the British military, the general said the Army was going to "use a sledgehammer to smash a walnut." (NYT, 11/19)

    1. CHALLENGE, December 3, 2003
    2. CHALLENGE, November 19, 2003
    3. CHALLENGE, November 5, 2003
    4. CHALLENGE, October 22, 2003

    Page 780 of 804

    • 775
    • 776
    • 777
    • 778
    • 779
    • 780
    • 781
    • 782
    • 783
    • 784

    Creative Commons License   This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

    • Contact Us for Help
    Back to Top
    Progressive Labor Party
    Close slide pane
    • Home
    • Our Fight
    • Challenge
    • Key Documents
    • LiteratureToggle dropdown
      • Books
      • Pamphlets & Leaflets
    • New MagazinesToggle dropdown
      • PL Magazines
      • The Communist
    • Join Us
    • Search
    • Donate