HAMMOND, IN, November 21— “If issues like racist police killings and the deportations bother you, we need you to stand up and join this rally!” Over 20 members of various student groups at Purdue University Northwest rallied against racist police terror and deportations. The goal was to show multi-racial unity in the face of injustices faced by students and their families. Progressive Labor Party (PLP) comrades in attendance took an active role in planning and sharpening the event’s multi-racial politics.
Anti-Racist Students Take Initiative
The Black Student Union, the Spanish Club, and the Social Justice Club represent the bulk of anti-racist, anti-sexist fightback at the university. The organizations came together to build unity on campus and fight racism at the time of rising fascism under President Donald Trump and growing global instability. They coordinated their efforts more collectively to draw more students, faculty, and campus workers into the struggle.
The female leaders of the groups kicked off the rally with a megaphone, shouting, “Black Lives Matter!” and “Together, United, We’ll Never Be Defeated!” The protesters grabbed the attention of students socializing nearby. The students made a quick but spirited march across campus before returning indoors to give speeches.
One leader of the Spanish Club gave an impassioned speech about the termination of DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) and the deadly increase in racist mass deportations in recent years. She stressed that no human being is illegal. DACA is not enough; we must fight for our working-class brothers and sisters and smash the racist borders that divide us.
A leader from the Social Justice Club connected the racist deportations to racist police murders, calling out the capitalist system as their source and multi-racial, pro-working-class unity as the alternative.
Another leader, from the Black Student Union, called on all those in the rally to link arms as a sign of solidarity against racist and sexist attacks. He noticed that some students in the student area did not link arms and said that those who cannot turn to their neighbor and link together with them in solidarity must examine their position in the fightback.
By the end of the rally, at least twice as many people had joined in to lock arms in support of the action.
More Fightback Needed
During a potluck/open mic that took place at the university dorms after the rally, a PL’er pushed future struggle. “So, how are we going to use the momentum of this event to continue being a thorn in the side of this racist, sexist, elitist university administration?”
Although Purdue Northwest is located in a majority working-class region, an area long punished by de-industrialization and environmental racism, the university can hardly claim to serve working-class students. Administrators and trustees have annually increased tuition costs and pushed outrageous fees, while using the increased cash flow to give the campus a cosmetic overhaul and pay themselves handsome salaries.
All the while, this same racist administration marginalizes non-traditional and international students by gutting support services that might otherwise help them integrate academically and socially.
The PL’er brought up previous multi-racial student struggles at Purdue in 2012 against racist and sexist professor Maurice Eisenstein, a despicable Zionist who the “pro-free speech” administration continues to defend. Eisenstein has spewed racism against Muslim students and students with disabilities. Then, as now, the only way that the university will be forced to take action against Eisenstein is if a significant portion of the campus students, faculty, and workers organize a protracted and militant struggle against the racist, sexist, and imperialist ideas promoted by both Eisenstein and all universities under capitalism in general.
The university bosses are quick to promote and defend racist and sexist speech because their capitalist masters use these ideas to divide working people. A revolutionary communist educational system will smash all the bosses’ non-scientific and divisive misinformation, and instead promote lifelong learning as a liberating weapon to advance the needs of the working masses.
Fight On
In the Party, we like to say “Fight to learn, learn to fight.” The fight against capitalism and for communist revolution is one that the university bosses will never teach, but remains the most important lesson that the international working-class can learn. PLP salutes these anti-racist, anti-sexist fighters at Purdue for their efforts to organize multi-racial unity in the face of fascist attacks. Obreros unidos, ¡jamás serán vencidos!
BAY AREA, November 15—Over 300 students at Stanford protested anti-Muslim racist Robert Spencer. Spencer didn’t learn his lesson from the first three times he was protested at college campuses this year. He founded the uber-racist journal Jihad Watch and founded the equally anti-Muslim racist and Zionist organization Stop Islamization of America. He is also a two-time bestseller at the liberal imperialist mouthpiece the New York Times.
Students lined up early to pack the room, and the antiracists filled all the seats except the ones reserved for the Stanford college Republicans and their friends.
Part way through the talk, we all stood up and walked out. Spencer and his cronies taunted the antiracists, calling them “fragile leftwing fascists.” After the walkout, students who participated and more antiracists who couldn’t get into the event rallied outside.
One member and one friend of PLP encouraged students to overcome fear of administrative retaliation. The antiracist actions revealed the university bosses’ racist nature by supporting the Stanford Republicans and bullying antiracist students. See full analysis next issue.
- Information
Annual Dinner Feeds Working-Class Unity, Counters Anti-Muslim Racism
- Information
- 24 November 2017 68 hits
NEW YORK CITY, November 22—Following the attack on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, Muslim workers around the country were targets of racist violence. Thousands were rounded up, jailed, and tortured by the government. In response, a local church began a yearly tradition of holding a “Children of Abraham dinner” in which Muslims, Christians, Jews, atheists, and others share dinner and vow to unite across religious lines. Every year, the dinner seems to get larger and we greet each other as old friends. As people entered the hall this year, they were welcomed, as they are every year, with delicious medjool dates, cheese and crackers and hummus on every table. The meal was halal in honor of our Muslim sisters and brothers.
Racist Violence in Yemen
One speaker was a member of the communist Progressive Labor Party (PLP) who works for an immigrant rights organization. She described the racist situation in Yemen, where Saudi Arabia and its allies have conducted daily bombing raids and imposed a blockade of ports that prevent food and medicine from reaching people who desperately need both. Tens of thousands of the working class have died, millions face famine, and over 900,000 suffer from cholera.
And none of this would be happening were it not for the billions of dollars of weapons sold by the U.S. government to Saudi Arabia. Both the Obama and Trump administrations are responsible for this anti-worker catastrophe. The speaker said her Yemeni friends had told her about the desperate conditions in their country. The room was silent. Then, money was collected to help relief efforts in Yemen and tentative plans made to have a rally at the Saudi consulate.
Working-Class Unity
The evening began with blessings, one from the sheikh of the local mosque and the other from a church minister. Dinner was served and working people from different faiths sat, ate, and talked together. After dinner a popular folk singer regaled us with two wonderful songs of unity and caring. Then a number of people spoke about different aspects of the struggle for unity in country whose political leadership pushes division and suspicion.
A speaker from a sister church in California talked about their efforts to offer sanctuary to undocumented immigrants. A leader of a local mosque spoke of how these dinners gave his community the courage to begin inviting people from other faith traditions to a yearly Iftar at the mosque. An Iftar is the evening meal to break the fast of the month of Ramadan. Many people from local synagogues and churches have attended this Iftar, including several of our church members. Another speaker talked of his joy at having his grandson at the dinner, and how he taught his grandson how important it is to give leadership and continuity to the struggle for multiracial unity.
The speeches were a mix of religious and political. Both emphasized the need for solidarity in a world where people often feel alone and helpless, dealing with the many problems that capitalism creates. And we’re not alone. In addition to the woman who talked about Yemen, another speaker told of how the entire Middle East is being turned upside down—with civil wars, aerial bombings, homelessness, hunger and disease—because the masters of wealth only care about controlling oil supplies, and couldn’t care less about the people there.
Our dinner demonstrated the opposite: solidarity among people and organizing for a better world. We distribute CHALLENGE to a number of the people who attended the dinner and helped organize church events opposing racism, mass incarceration and attacks on immigrants.
NEW YORK CITY, November 11—The ability of youth to provide leadership was on display as teachers, students and workers gathered today for PLP’s annual College Conference. Although capitalism bombards us with the message that youth are lazy, irresponsible, violent and selfish, PLP places trust in them and today a multiracial group of young people led a conference with the theme of “Smashing Borders.” More than 50 attendees brainstormed how to combat the borders designed by the bosses to separate and weaken our class.
The opening speech highlighted how capitalists use borders economically and politically. By drawing borders where they want, bosses control resources, markets and workers. Historically, borders were drawn to give the victorious bosses control over the resources of the defeated power. When the Ottoman Empire was defeated at the end of World War I, the Middle East was carved up into countries controlled by European powers. The countries of Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Palestine and Transjordan were created by French and British imperialists in order to control the region and to own the newly discovered oil there. Once bosses draw their borders, the workers there are trapped, unable to leave without approval from the state. Meanwhile, their profits, stolen from those workers, move freely and easily across borders, to be invested wherever the rate of profit is highest.
The speaker also pointed out that borders have a political purpose under capitalism—to divide and weaken the working class. Along with racism and sexism, there is nationalism—the notion that workers of a particular country have more in common with, and should have political allegiance to the bosses and politicians of that country. The capitalists want us to believe that workers are different because of their “race,” ethnicity, gender, and nationality, hoping to prevent the unity of workers necessary to take back the value stolen from our labor.
Panel: From Bolshevik Revolution to the Caribbean to Today
After the opening speech, the struggle to smash borders was discussed by a panel of four speakers who described how communists have successfully fought to overcome borders over the years. The first speaker told of how a hundred years ago the Bolsheviks had made a revolution that liberated more than one-sixth of the world’s population and brought equality to the various oppressed nations that had made up the former Russian Empire. The next speaker gave a brief history of the struggles of communists in the Caribbean from the 1930s on, describing how their national fights are often linked to struggles in other countries, such as the campaign to free the “Scottsboro Boys.” The third speaker discussed how working in an immigrants’ rights group exposed the inhumanity of borders while also providing a good lesson in how we must always struggle to blast capitalist ideas wherever they appear.
Finally, the last speaker spoke of borders that became apparent when she began working at a community college as an adjunct professor. In addition to the racism, nationalism and sexism that divide us, she discovered there are also borders between full-time and part-time professors, between professors and staff and between professors and students. All of which weaken our struggle. She swiftly learned no place is free from stratification and exploitation under capitalism. Despite her delicate position as an adjunct, our comrade fearlessly promoted revolutionary politics and fought to improve conditions for students and their teachers. Over the past year, she worked with antiracist students, professors and staff to organize a conference on immigration and mass incarceration that attracted 500 students, and more recently to raise money for relief aid for Puerto Rico.
Learning to Fight
After the panelists spoke, we broke up into workshops, where we discussed how borders affect us on our own campuses and what to do about it. Students from one West Coast university told us how they were organizing mass opposition to an upcoming campus speech by a notorious anti-Islamic bigot, Robert Spencer. Islamophobia constructs borders between Muslim and non-Muslim people and is used to justify brutal U.S. wars of occupation that kill and oppress people in countries like Iraq and Afghanistan. The workshops discussed the idea that if we really are to eliminate all the borders imposed on us, we have to reach out not only to other students and faculty but also to other workers on campus and on our jobs.
At the wrap-up, students and teachers feel emboldened to return to campus and sharpen the fight against borders. We left energized to educate, and organize with other workers on campus. More than anything, we left the conference confident that the future is one of a borderless, international working class.
- Information
Untenured Teacher Pushes Back Against Principal’s Mistreatment
- Information
- 24 November 2017 69 hits
NEW YORK CITY, November 21—One of the Progressive Labor Party’s chants says, “What do we do when under attack? Stand up, fight back!” At a New York City high school where students and teachers are constantly harassed by the administration, a young, untenured teacher did just that. She also struck a blow against sexism.
When the principal observed this teacher, she had a lesson with PowerPoint slides and had to open her lesson plan on her laptop. The principle was upset that she didn’t have a printed copy of her lesson plan, and he put a letter in her file chastising her. This violates the union contract, which states that administrators may only criticize the lesson, not the format of the lesson plan. Even the Chancellor’s weekly newsletter to principals warns them not to use a school handbook to amend the contract. Attacking little things like the format of a lesson plan is one way the administration keeps new teachers intimidated and prevents them from speaking up against bad practices at the school.
Here, as at many NYC schools, students and teachers face many problems. Too many administrators have never taught, almost all the classes are overcrowded, and we have a principal who pick on untenured teachers over nonsense.
Veteran and
New Teachers, Unite
The attacks are constant, but many teachers have fought back. Unfortunately, it’s mostly been the veteran teachers, who have tenure (job protection). Untenured teachers are told they have no rights and can be fired at any time, for any reason. As a result, it’s mainly veteran teachers who stand up to the administration, while those without tenure are advised to keep their heads down and be “team players”.
When this woman teacher began asking co-workers for help, she received conflicting advice. Some men, who historically fought back in the school, said to do nothing and be a “team player” because that’s what the principal likes. This reflected a degree of sexism – that a woman shouldn’t stand up to mistreatment from a male principal. However, some female teachers and one male teacher, known for being a member of Progressive Labor Party, encouraged her to fight and not quietly accept the disciplinary letter.
Despite being untenured, she wrote a short rebuttal accompanied by evidence about the principal’s wrongdoing. These daily fights over lesson plans and the general harassment by bosses at work are important because they are part of the steeling of the working class that’s necessary for struggles that lay ahead. In particular, this struggle was a small blow against intimidation and sexist ideas at work.
There are many more struggles occurring in this school that are all geared toward fighting back against an administration that pays lip service to wanting to help the students while attacking teachers and our ability to teach them. The dedication of teachers toward their students has motivated them to attend PTA meetings and build closer ties with parents. This act of defiance is an example of building fightback on the job and forging the unity of men and women necessary to fight capitalism.